Is Greenlane Holdings (NASDAQ:GNLN) Using Debt In A Risky Way?

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital. So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. As with many other companies Greenlane Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:GNLN) makes use of debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

Advertisement

When Is Debt A Problem?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

Check out our latest analysis for Greenlane Holdings

What Is Greenlane Holdings's Net Debt?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Greenlane Holdings had debt of US$8.23m at the end of September 2019, a reduction from US$8.74m over a year. But it also has US$52.5m in cash to offset that, meaning it has US$44.3m net cash.

NasdaqGM:GNLN Historical Debt, November 25th 2019
NasdaqGM:GNLN Historical Debt, November 25th 2019

A Look At Greenlane Holdings's Liabilities

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Greenlane Holdings had liabilities of US$22.2m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$12.4m due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$52.5m as well as receivables valued at US$7.59m due within 12 months. So it can boast US$25.5m more liquid assets than total liabilities.

This excess liquidity suggests that Greenlane Holdings is taking a careful approach to debt. Given it has easily adequate short term liquidity, we don't think it will have any issues with its lenders. Simply put, the fact that Greenlane Holdings has more cash than debt is arguably a good indication that it can manage its debt safely. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Greenlane Holdings can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

In the last year Greenlane Holdings wasn't profitable at an EBIT level, but managed to grow its revenue by26%, to US$199m. Shareholders probably have their fingers crossed that it can grow its way to profits.

So How Risky Is Greenlane Holdings?

Statistically speaking companies that lose money are riskier than those that make money. And in the last year Greenlane Holdings had negative earnings before interest and tax (EBIT), truth be told. Indeed, in that time it burnt through US$54m of cash and made a loss of US$15m. With only US$44.3m on the balance sheet, it would appear that its going to need to raise capital again soon. With very solid revenue growth in the last year, Greenlane Holdings may be on a path to profitability. Pre-profit companies are often risky, but they can also offer great rewards. For riskier companies like Greenlane Holdings I always like to keep an eye on whether insiders are buying or selling. So click here if you want to find out for yourself.

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Thank you for reading.

M
mitchell_lawler
mitchell_lawler

A lot of companies don't have a moat, they have customers too busy to switch. AI agents could change that.

56
Andrew Legget

Are social media stocks the new Big Tobacco?

Are social media stocks the new Big Tobacco? cover
Greater regulatory scrutiny is catching up with digital platforms, posing a rising risk for social media stocks. But as Big Tobacco discovered, that's not always a bad outcome for shareholders.
14

About NasdaqCM:GNLN

Greenlane Holdings

Focuses on the acquisition, staking, validator participation, and strategic deployment of digital assets.

Moderate risk with adequate balance sheet.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

CE
Ceazar
SPAI logo
Ceazar on Sparc AI ·

When GPS fails: this small cap is fixing a $54B drone problem

Fair Value:CA$5.2541.1% undervalued
195 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
29 users have liked this narrative
CO
composite32
Emerging Author
AROC logo
composite32 on Archrock ·

AI Needs Power. Power Needs Gas. Gas Needs Compression: The Archrock Investment Thesis

Fair Value:US$44.8831.9% undervalued
8 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
1 users have liked this narrative
JO
John_Eric
Emerging Author
AEIS logo
John_Eric on Advanced Energy Industries ·

AEIS Is Firing on Every Cylinder. My Problem Is the Safety Factor.

Fair Value:US$567.8655.9% undervalued
6 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
7 users have liked this narrative
IS
LRCX logo
isidrohg on Lam Research ·

The Memory Shortage Is Lam's Order Book — Whether It Persists Or Resolves

Fair Value:US$423.8536.1% undervalued
6 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
4 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

EV
CHG logo
evadav on Chemring Group ·

Chemring remains a strong long term defence holding

Fair Value:UK£6.3515.8% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
LU
LunaRodas
TCOM logo
LunaRodas on Trip.com Group ·

TCOM | Trip.com Group Limited: What They Said vs. What They Did

Fair Value:US$46.8316.2% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
RO
Robbo
INTU logo
Robbo on Intuit ·

Intuit: Is AI Really the Threat the Market Thinks It Is?

Fair Value:US$37412.0% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

AN
AnalystConsensusTarget
NVDA logo
AnalystConsensusTarget on NVIDIA ·

NVDA: Expanding AI Demand Will Drive Major Data Center Investments Through 2026

Fair Value:US$302.8329.9% undervalued
1452 users have followed this narrative
8 users have commented on this narrative
35 users have liked this narrative
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget
GOOGL logo
AnalystConsensusTarget on Alphabet ·

GOOGL: AI Platform Expansion And Cloud Demand Will Support Durable Performance Amid Competitive Pressures

Fair Value:US$427.8919.4% undervalued
1628 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
19 users have liked this narrative
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget
AMZN logo
AnalystConsensusTarget on Amazon.com ·

AMZN: Acceleration In Cloud And AI Will Drive Margin Expansion Ahead

Fair Value:US$32724.0% undervalued
1644 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

AN
TPG0 logo
anthony_x0j2w on Platform Group SE KGaA ·

Hello,(I am a shareholder).I spent the summer investigating in whatever I was able to find in the press, the trustee, or legal, and comparing it to FS Benner's declaration/transcripts:press: MM has a tendancy to use facts, modify them and turn them the way they want: 100% of their claims against TPG0 is traçable factually, 80% is flawed and interpreted. Example are numerous: 11M loans banks to be paid seems right, but it has not been an issue at all, it has been paid in full. (and it happens all the time in every business...); the previous HR becoming a financial director in the article herself being attacked by TPG on the legal side; the wrong address of curator (if truly announced by TPG).Trustee: according to my research (which can be incomplete) no communication to the Nordic trustee (hereby, bond holders) has been done on a, indebtedness (late payment) > 1M€, which is their obligation by contract (clause 14.d - https://corporate.the-platform-group.com/bond/) => this is a sign of a huge lie and fraud, or the sign that there is no indebtedness > 1M€ over the whole TPG group.Legal: still awaiting for an answer, probable that I won't get it.VALUATIONYou can spent hours working the fundamentals, if they're flawed...the thesis falls.Anyway, I always substracts the badwill (that I consider non-current - you have it in the CFS) & non-controlling interests from my valuation:Earnings ~22MFCF ~40M€The financial statements are not the issue here, we are more on an cheap option on the sincerity of the accounts that a real valuation. Unfortunately, these are unverifiable elements, hence the low price./!\ Careful:the accounts are consolidated and skip the subsidiaries issues...Careful with the business model: TPG0 is a financial holding that acquire subsidiaries, hold the debt, and has no operations. 100% of the Cash Flow comes from subs' dividends => it is a risk here, more a plumber risk than an operational one, but nevertheless...The auditor is too small, and managed by the same firm than before, with 140K€/year commission => it's too low, nobody external really reviewed what Benner and his team are doing internallycapital increase do not go through the CFS, but through change in equity AND equity in the BSIf the equity stays low too long, the WACC increase will be unbearable (I have a 30% global, with a 118% on equity): diluting is expensive => TPG machine can stay broken for a while.Most of the people I talk with never saw this, while this is ESSENTIAL to Benner's business model.SEVERAL EVENTS THAT COULD CHANGE:AEP is being audited by KPMG: if Benner plays the "we will propose KPMG to our shareholders BEOY", this can increase the trust in him significantly/KPMG (or other) to validate the 2026 IFRS accounts & having a word on HGB's: though still consolidated, at least we'll know...AEP being eventually acquired: while it carries a high integration risk due to its size, they talked about it so many times, that trust goes with it.Without this combination of event, the equity is doomed to stay at this level, IMO.Do not forget to also follow the bond: with TPG's announced safe harbor plan for buyback (25% of daily exchange), it is also interesting to check this illiquid and retail market: https://live.deutsche-boerse.com/bond/no0013256834-the-platform-group-ag-8-875-24-28?mic=XFRA

1
|
0