Is GenMark Diagnostics, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:GNMK) CEO Pay Fair?

    Hany Massarany has been the CEO of GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. (NASDAQ:GNMK) since 2011. First, this article will compare CEO compensation with compensation at similar sized companies. Next, we'll consider growth that the business demonstrates. And finally we will reflect on how common stockholders have fared in the last few years, as a secondary measure of performance. The aim of all this is to consider the appropriateness of CEO pay levels.

    See our latest analysis for GenMark Diagnostics

    Advertisement

    How Does Hany Massarany's Compensation Compare With Similar Sized Companies?

    According to our data, GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. has a market capitalization of US$327m, and pays its CEO total annual compensation worth US$3.3m. (This figure is for the year to December 2018). While this analysis focuses on total compensation, it's worth noting the salary is lower, valued at US$512k. We looked at a group of companies with market capitalizations from US$200m to US$800m, and the median CEO total compensation was US$1.9m.

    As you can see, Hany Massarany is paid more than the median CEO pay at companies of a similar size, in the same market. However, this does not necessarily mean GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. is paying too much. We can get a better idea of how generous the pay is by looking at the performance of the underlying business.

    The graphic below shows how CEO compensation at GenMark Diagnostics has changed from year to year.

    NasdaqGM:GNMK CEO Compensation, August 6th 2019
    NasdaqGM:GNMK CEO Compensation, August 6th 2019

    Is GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. Growing?

    On average over the last three years, GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. has grown earnings per share (EPS) by 5.3% each year (using a line of best fit). It achieved revenue growth of 18% over the last year.

    I would argue that the modest growth in revenue is a notable positive. And, while modest, the earnings per share growth is noticeable. So while performance isn't amazing, we think it really does seem quite respectable.

    Has GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. Been A Good Investment?

    With a three year total loss of 40%, GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. would certainly have some dissatisfied shareholders. It therefore might be upsetting for shareholders if the CEO were paid generously.

    In Summary...

    We compared total CEO remuneration at GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. with the amount paid at companies with a similar market capitalization. Our data suggests that it pays above the median CEO pay within that group.

    The growth in the business has been uninspiring, but the shareholder returns have arguably been worse, over the last three years. Shareholders may wish to consider further research. Although we don't think the CEO pay is too high, it is probably more on the generous side of things. CEO compensation is one thing, but it is also interesting to check if the CEO is buying or selling GenMark Diagnostics (free visualization of insider trades).

    Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

    We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

    If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.

    M
    mitchell_lawler
    mitchell_lawler

    Everyone's watching the oil price. The harder problem is the gas that can't take a detour.

    Everyone's watching the oil price. The harder problem is the gas that can't take a detour. cover
    88
    R
    Rob_Curious

    What I've learnt in the last six months is that fuel supply disruption is a real portfolio risk, and one of the better hedges is a small allocation to shipping. Though it's insane how much these have run up this year.

    f
    frank_ub3n0

    Spot on. Shipping and logistics is much larger constraint for gas than oil. Sorry to break it to you. No quick fixes for that.

    Mitchell Lawler

    What happens to energy stocks as the fix gets built?

    What happens to energy stocks as the fix gets built? cover
    Conflict around the Strait of Hormuz has led investors to oil and tankers. The trouble is, the antidote to the chokepoints is already being built, and it may not reward the same energy stocks.
    21
    Advertisement

    Weekly Picks

    CE
    Ceazar
    SPAI logo
    Ceazar on Sparc AI ·

    When GPS fails: this small cap is fixing a $54B drone problem

    Fair Value:CA$5.2532.6% undervalued
    205 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    31 users have liked this narrative
    CO
    composite32
    Emerging Author
    AROC logo
    composite32 on Archrock ·

    AI Needs Power. Power Needs Gas. Gas Needs Compression: The Archrock Investment Thesis

    Fair Value:US$44.8829.7% undervalued
    31 users have followed this narrative
    2 users have commented on this narrative
    3 users have liked this narrative
    JO
    John_Eric
    Emerging Author
    AEIS logo
    John_Eric on Advanced Energy Industries ·

    AEIS Is Firing on Every Cylinder. My Problem Is the Safety Factor.

    Fair Value:US$567.8653.8% undervalued
    18 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    7 users have liked this narrative
    IS
    LRCX logo
    isidrohg on Lam Research ·

    The Memory Shortage Is Lam's Order Book — Whether It Persists Or Resolves

    Fair Value:US$423.8532.0% undervalued
    23 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    7 users have liked this narrative

    Updated Narratives

    AM
    OSCR logo
    amanuel_vicqm on Oscar Health ·

    Oscar Health will soar with a projected 21% cagr revenue growth plus new business sector

    Fair Value:US$69.9154.0% undervalued
    1 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    LU
    LunaRodas
    RBT logo
    LunaRodas on Robertet ·

    RBT | Robertet SA: What They Said vs. What They Did

    Fair Value:€705.453.1% overvalued
    1 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    MA
    MarkoVT
    RDDT logo
    MarkoVT on Reddit ·

    Sustainable Growth VS hedging gamblers

    Fair Value:US$180.1616.3% undervalued
    5 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative

    Popular Narratives

    AN
    AnalystConsensusTarget
    NVDA logo
    AnalystConsensusTarget on NVIDIA ·

    NVDA: Expanding AI Demand Will Drive Major Data Center Investments Through 2026

    Fair Value:US$302.8326.6% undervalued
    1474 users have followed this narrative
    8 users have commented on this narrative
    35 users have liked this narrative
    AN
    AnalystConsensusTarget
    GOOGL logo
    AnalystConsensusTarget on Alphabet ·

    GOOGL: AI Platform Expansion And Cloud Demand Will Support Durable Performance Amid Competitive Pressures

    Fair Value:US$427.8918.3% undervalued
    1641 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    19 users have liked this narrative
    AN
    AnalystConsensusTarget
    AMZN logo
    AnalystConsensusTarget on Amazon.com ·

    AMZN: Acceleration In Cloud And AI Will Drive Margin Expansion Ahead

    Fair Value:US$32722.4% undervalued
    1654 users have followed this narrative
    1 users have commented on this narrative
    16 users have liked this narrative

    Trending Discussion

    AN
    TPG0 logo
    anthony_x0j2w on Platform Group SE KGaA ·

    Hello,(I am a shareholder).I spent the summer investigating in whatever I was able to find in the press, the trustee, or legal, and comparing it to FS Benner's declaration/transcripts:press: MM has a tendancy to use facts, modify them and turn them the way they want: 100% of their claims against TPG0 is traçable factually, 80% is flawed and interpreted. Example are numerous: 11M loans banks to be paid seems right, but it has not been an issue at all, it has been paid in full. (and it happens all the time in every business...); the previous HR becoming a financial director in the article herself being attacked by TPG on the legal side; the wrong address of curator (if truly announced by TPG).Trustee: according to my research (which can be incomplete) no communication to the Nordic trustee (hereby, bond holders) has been done on a, indebtedness (late payment) > 1M€, which is their obligation by contract (clause 14.d - https://corporate.the-platform-group.com/bond/) => this is a sign of a huge lie and fraud, or the sign that there is no indebtedness > 1M€ over the whole TPG group.Legal: still awaiting for an answer, probable that I won't get it.VALUATIONYou can spent hours working the fundamentals, if they're flawed...the thesis falls.Anyway, I always substracts the badwill (that I consider non-current - you have it in the CFS) & non-controlling interests from my valuation:Earnings ~22MFCF ~40M€The financial statements are not the issue here, we are more on an cheap option on the sincerity of the accounts that a real valuation. Unfortunately, these are unverifiable elements, hence the low price./!\ Careful:the accounts are consolidated and skip the subsidiaries issues...Careful with the business model: TPG0 is a financial holding that acquire subsidiaries, hold the debt, and has no operations. 100% of the Cash Flow comes from subs' dividends => it is a risk here, more a plumber risk than an operational one, but nevertheless...The auditor is too small, and managed by the same firm than before, with 140K€/year commission => it's too low, nobody external really reviewed what Benner and his team are doing internallycapital increase do not go through the CFS, but through change in equity AND equity in the BSIf the equity stays low too long, the WACC increase will be unbearable (I have a 30% global, with a 118% on equity): diluting is expensive => TPG machine can stay broken for a while.Most of the people I talk with never saw this, while this is ESSENTIAL to Benner's business model.SEVERAL EVENTS THAT COULD CHANGE:AEP is being audited by KPMG: if Benner plays the "we will propose KPMG to our shareholders BEOY", this can increase the trust in him significantly/KPMG (or other) to validate the 2026 IFRS accounts & having a word on HGB's: though still consolidated, at least we'll know...AEP being eventually acquired: while it carries a high integration risk due to its size, they talked about it so many times, that trust goes with it.Without this combination of event, the equity is doomed to stay at this level, IMO.Do not forget to also follow the bond: with TPG's announced safe harbor plan for buyback (25% of daily exchange), it is also interesting to check this illiquid and retail market: https://live.deutsche-boerse.com/bond/no0013256834-the-platform-group-ag-8-875-24-28?mic=XFRA

    1
    |
    0