A 17-Year Story That Most Investors Only Discovered in the Last Three
In 2010, Celsius Holdings (CELH) was generating roughly US$5 million in annual revenue, a forgotten energy drink with niche distribution in Scandinavian gyms and a handful of US health food stores.
By the end of 2025, the company had crossed US$2 billion in trailing twelve-month revenue and acquired two major energy drink brands. It secured PepsiCo as both its primary distributor and an 11% equity holder. Most retail investors only discovered this stock near the peak in 2023.
The ones who understood what actually happened in 2024 and why the crash was a channel inventory problem, not a brand problem, had the best entry point in a decade. This narrative is about understanding which of those two situations you are looking at right now, as the company enters an entirely new chapter.

Celsius revenue from 2012 to the present. The inflexion point in FY2022 is the Pepsi distribution deal. The FY2024 plateau is Pepsi's inventory correction, NOT a collapse in consumer demand. The TTM (trailing twelve months to September 2025) reflects the addition of Alani Nu and Rockstar Energy.
(Source: MacroTrends, macrotrends.net, publicly available, no subscription required)
What Celsius Actually Sells And Why the Category Matters More Than the Brand
Celsius makes sugar-free, functional energy drinks positioned as a "better-for-you" alternative to Red Bull and Monster. The marketing angle is fitness and active lifestyle not gaming culture or extreme sports, which is where Red Bull and Monster built their brands in the 2000s.
That positioning distinction is commercially important. Celsius's core consumer is a 25–40-year-old health-conscious woman or man who considers themselves active, reads ingredient labels, and buys at Target, Costco, or a gym not a petrol station at midnight. This demographic spends more, is more brand loyal, and was structurally underserved by Red Bull and Monster.
As of end-2025, Celsius Holdings owns three brands:
- CELSIUS, the original, targeting health-conscious and active consumers
- Alani Nu was acquired in February 2025 for US$1.8B, targeting female wellness consumers, growing 64% at retail in 2024
- Rockstar Energy was acquired by PepsiCo in August 2025, targeting traditional male energy drink consumers
Combined, these three brands captured approximately 17% of the US energy drink market by end-2025, making Celsius Holdings the undisputed third-largest player globally, behind only Red Bull and Monster
US Energy Drink Market Share (approximate, end-2025):

Celsius entered a two-player market and became the third pillar within a decade. The acquisition of Alani Nu and Rockstar accelerated that position meaningfully.
(Source: App Economy Insights, citing Circana retail scan data, appeconomyinsights.com)
- Red Bull: ~36%
- Monster: ~28%
- Celsius + Alani Nu + Rockstar: ~12%
- All others: ~24%
The Pepsi Deal: Why August 2022 Was the Actual Inflection Point (Not the Crash in 2024)
On 1 August 2022, PepsiCo announced two things simultaneously: a long-term exclusive distribution agreement with Celsius for US and international markets, and a US$550 million equity investment for an 8.5% stake via convertible preferred stock.
To understand why this mattered structurally, you need to know how energy drinks are actually sold.
Approximately 70% of energy drinks in the US are sold through convenience stores and petrol stations not supermarkets. These channels are dominated by Direct Store Delivery (DSD) networks. Red Bull has its own DSD. Monster uses Coca-Cola's DSD. Before the Pepsi deal, Celsius was relying on a patchwork of regional independent distributors. Those distributors have inferior shelf negotiation power, inferior cooler placement, and inferior relationships with convenience store operators.
The moment Celsius plugged into PepsiCo's DSD network one of the two or three best distribution systems in American consumer goods it gained access to channels where it had essentially zero presence. Revenue more than doubled in FY2022 and doubled again in FY2023.
PepsiCo's strategic rationale was equally clear: its owned energy brands (Rockstar, MTN Dew Energy) were losing share. Celsius gave them a high-growth brand without the risk of building one from scratch.
(verify via: Celsius-PepsiCo joint press release, August 1 2022, ir.celsiusholdingsinc.com; CNBC reporting, cnbc.com)
2024: Why the Stock Fell 70% and Why That Was the Wrong Reaction
In September 2024, Celsius management appeared at a Barclays consumer conference and disclosed something that sent the stock down 12% in a single afternoon: PepsiCo would be ordering approximately US$100–120 million less product in Q3 2024 compared to Q3 2023.
By year-end 2024, the stock had fallen roughly 70% from its all-time high near US$100.
Here is what most retail investors misunderstood.
Celsius recognises revenue when it ships product to PepsiCo, not when the consumer at a petrol station buys the can. In 2023, PepsiCo was still new to distributing Celsius and over-ordered relative to actual consumer sell-through. This inflated Celsius's reported revenue in FY2023 by an estimated US$100M+.
In 2024, PepsiCo corrected this: it ordered less, burning down its excess inventory. Celsius's reported revenue barely grew. But consumer sales at retail the actual demand signal grew approximately 22% year-on-year in 2024, according to Celsius management.
Put differently: the demand was never broken. The accounting relationship between Celsius and its distributor created an artificial sugar high in 2023 and an artificial hangover in 2024. The market did not distinguish between the two.
The evidence that demand was intact: PepsiCo did not exit the relationship. It doubled down. In August 2025, PepsiCo invested a further US$585 million in Celsius, raising its stake to 11%, and transferred the Rockstar brand to Celsius entirely.
You do not hand a struggling partner your flagship-owned brand and invest another US$585 million if you think consumer demand has permanently broken.
(verify via: Celsius Q3 2024 management commentary at Barclays conference, September 2024; Celsius 2024 annual report; PepsiCo stake increase announcement, August 2025, ir.celsiusholdingsinc.com)

CELH stock price 2021–2026. The peak near US$100 in early 2024 reflected over-ordering-inflated FY2023 revenue. The crash to the mid-US$20s reflected the correction. Actual consumer demand never turned negative. The stock recovered as the Alani Nu and Rockstar acquisitions were announced. (Source: MacroTrends publicly available)
Management: One Honest Assessment
CEO John Fieldly has been with Celsius since 2012 and has served as CEO since 2018. He is a credible operator who guided the company through the Pepsi deal, the inventory crisis, and two major acquisitions in the span of 12 months all without losing the distribution partnership.
The acquisitions of Alani Nu and Rockstar represent the largest capital allocation decisions in company history. US$1.8B for Alani Nu was a full-price deal the brand was growing 64% at retail, and Celsius paid a premium for that momentum. Whether it can sustain that growth rate under Celsius ownership is the central execution risk of the next three years.
One legitimate governance concern: the shareholder class action lawsuit filed in late 2024 alleging that management failed to disclose the extent of PepsiCo's over-ordering during the FY2023 reporting period. This is unresolved and worth monitoring. If it results in a material settlement, it adds to the cost base. More importantly, it raises a disclosure discipline question that investors should weigh.
Insider ownership is meaningful. Fieldly and the management team hold equity, aligning incentives with long-term shareholders to a reasonable degree.
(verify via: Celsius DEF 14A proxy filing via sec.gov; class action filing December 2024; management equity ownership from proxy)
Where the Thesis Breaks: Three Specific Tests
- Alani Nu market share stalls post-PepsiCo distribution transition: Distribution transitions always create short-term volatility. If Alani Nu's retail scan data (cited in earnings calls) shows growth below 20% in the first two quarters after moving to PepsiCo DSD, the acquisition premium is hard to justify. Watch: NielsenIQ data cited in quarterly earnings calls.
- International revenue does not inflect by FY2026: If international revenue is still below US$150M by end-FY2026, the long-term bull case is delayed by at least two years. There is simply no path to a US$3B+ revenue business if 95% of revenue remains North American. Watch: the international revenue line in each quarterly result.
- Gross margin compression from Rockstar: Rockstar is a declining brand with legacy cost structures. If integrating Rockstar pushes Celsius's blended gross margin below 45% (currently tracking ~51%), it signals the acquisition is value-destructive. Watch: gross margin line in quarterly results for four quarters post-acquisition.
Have other thoughts on Celsius Holdings?
Create your own narrative on this stock, and estimate its Fair Value using our Valuator tool.
Create NarrativeHow well do narratives help inform your perspective?
Disclaimer
The user JD009 holds no position in NasdaqCM:CELH. Simply Wall St has no position in any of the companies mentioned. Simply Wall St may provide the securities issuer or related entities with website advertising services for a fee, on an arm's length basis. These relationships have no impact on the way we conduct our business, the content we host, or how our content is served to users. The author of this narrative is not affiliated with, nor authorised by Simply Wall St as a sub-authorised representative. This narrative is general in nature and explores scenarios and estimates created by the author. The narrative does not reflect the opinions of Simply Wall St, and the views expressed are the opinion of the author alone, acting on their own behalf. These scenarios are not indicative of the company's future performance and are exploratory in the ideas they cover. The fair value estimates are estimations only, and does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and they do not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Note that the author's analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.