- Italy
- /
- Energy Services
- /
- BIT:SPM
Here's Why We Think Saipem's (BIT:SPM) Statutory Earnings Might Be Conservative
Many investors consider it preferable to invest in profitable companies over unprofitable ones, because profitability suggests a business is sustainable. That said, the current statutory profit is not always a good guide to a company's underlying profitability. This article will consider whether Saipem's (BIT:SPM) statutory profits are a good guide to its underlying earnings.
While Saipem was able to generate revenue of €9.11b in the last twelve months, we think its profit result of €12.0m was more important. The chart below shows that while revenue has fallen over the last three years, the company has moved from unprofitable to profitable.
Check out our latest analysis for Saipem
Of course, it is only sensible to look beyond the statutory profits and question how well those numbers represent the sustainable earnings power of the business. As a result, today we're going to take a closer look at Saipem's cashflow, and unusual items, with a view to understanding what these might tell us about its statutory profit. That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.
A Closer Look At Saipem's Earnings
One key financial ratio used to measure how well a company converts its profit to free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio. The accrual ratio subtracts the FCF from the profit for a given period, and divides the result by the average operating assets of the company over that time. This ratio tells us how much of a company's profit is not backed by free cashflow.
As a result, a negative accrual ratio is a positive for the company, and a positive accrual ratio is a negative. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. That's because some academic studies have suggested that high accruals ratios tend to lead to lower profit or less profit growth.
For the year to December 2019, Saipem had an accrual ratio of -0.23. That indicates that its free cash flow quite significantly exceeded its statutory profit. Indeed, in the last twelve months it reported free cash flow of €921m, well over the €12.0m it reported in profit. Saipem shareholders are no doubt pleased that free cash flow improved over the last twelve months. However, that's not all there is to consider. The accrual ratio is reflecting the impact of unusual items on statutory profit, at least in part.
The Impact Of Unusual Items On Profit
Saipem's profit was reduced by unusual items worth €91m in the last twelve months, and this helped it produce high cash conversion, as reflected by its unusual items. This is what you'd expect to see where a company has a non-cash charge reducing paper profits. It's never great to see unusual items costing the company profits, but on the upside, things might improve sooner rather than later. When we analysed the vast majority of listed companies worldwide, we found that significant unusual items are often not repeated. And that's hardly a surprise given these line items are considered unusual. Assuming those unusual expenses don't come up again, we'd therefore expect Saipem to produce a higher profit next year, all else being equal.
Our Take On Saipem's Profit Performance
In conclusion, both Saipem's accrual ratio and its unusual items suggest that its statutory earnings are probably reasonably conservative. Based on these factors, we think Saipem's underlying earnings potential is as good as, or probably even better, than the statutory profit makes it seem! If you'd like to know more about Saipem as a business, it's important to be aware of any risks it's facing. In terms of investment risks, we've identified 2 warning signs with Saipem, and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
After our examination into the nature of Saipem's profit, we've come away optimistic for the company. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying to be useful.
If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.
We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Thank you for reading.
About BIT:SPM
Saipem
Provides energy and infrastructure solutions worldwide.
Flawless balance sheet with reasonable growth potential.
Similar Companies
Market Insights
Weekly Picks

When GPS fails: this small cap is fixing a $54B drone problem

Why Amdocs is a high conviction Buy for me?
Why SBM Offshore’s €30 Share Price May Be Too Harsh On Its Backlog

One of China's Fastest-Growing Restaurant Chains Trades on Just 7x Earnings and an 8% Dividend
Recently Updated Narratives

Figma (FIG): The S&P 500’s Design Standard Turning Into an All-in-One Platform

MercadoLibre and the Spreadsheet Trick That Decides Everything
Diagnostyka SA: Solidny lider, który już nie jest tani
Popular Narratives

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.
A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Warren Buffett Just Bet $10 Billion on Google. The Catch? You May Already Be Too Late.
Trending Discussion
As someone who has dealt directly with them as a CTO for a credit union, I have 8 years of horror stories about doing business with them. If there was any other competitor than could deliver 80% of Fiserv services, there would be a mad rush to migrate to them. They should thank their lucky stars they are a near monopoly. this industry is so ripe for a well funded competitor. Their integration of technology is awful, their ability to fix their own implementation screwups is sadly tragic. Sometimes they just silently kill support tickets without resolution and you never find out until you do a follow up inquiry. Why, because sometimes no one you are dealing with knows how to fix it and knows no one to ask for help. They can not meet their own implementation deadlines and sometimes there is no one on a technical team dealing with you that has any banking or credit union experience. The is an industry insider phrase when you meet other Fiserv customers called being "Fiserved". It means telling others of your worst stories of dealing with them. Ask around, all CTO's have some doozies.


