Here's Why We Think Cpl Resources's (ISE:DQ5) Statutory Earnings Might Be Conservative

    Statistically speaking, it is less risky to invest in profitable companies than in unprofitable ones. That said, the current statutory profit is not always a good guide to a company's underlying profitability. In this article, we'll look at how useful this year's statutory profit is, when analysing Cpl Resources (ISE:DQ5).

    While Cpl Resources was able to generate revenue of €569.3m in the last twelve months, we think its profit result of €21.0m was more important. In the chart below, you can see that its profit and revenue have both grown over the last three years.

    View our latest analysis for Cpl Resources

    earnings-and-revenue-history
    ISE:DQ5 Earnings and Revenue History September 24th 2020

    Of course, it is only sensible to look beyond the statutory profits and question how well those numbers represent the sustainable earnings power of the business. As a result, we think it's well worth considering what Cpl Resources' cashflow (when compared to its earnings) can tell us about the nature of its statutory profit. That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

    Advertisement

    Examining Cashflow Against Cpl Resources' Earnings

    In high finance, the key ratio used to measure how well a company converts reported profits into free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio (from cashflow). To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. You could think of the accrual ratio from cashflow as the 'non-FCF profit ratio'.

    As a result, a negative accrual ratio is a positive for the company, and a positive accrual ratio is a negative. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.

    Over the twelve months to June 2020, Cpl Resources recorded an accrual ratio of -0.24. That indicates that its free cash flow quite significantly exceeded its statutory profit. In fact, it had free cash flow of €36m in the last year, which was a lot more than its statutory profit of €21.0m. Cpl Resources' free cash flow improved over the last year, which is generally good to see.

    Our Take On Cpl Resources' Profit Performance

    As we discussed above, Cpl Resources' accrual ratio indicates strong conversion of profit to free cash flow, which is a positive for the company. Because of this, we think Cpl Resources' underlying earnings potential is as good as, or possibly even better, than the statutory profit makes it seem! And on top of that, its earnings per share have grown at an extremely impressive rate over the last three years. Of course, we've only just scratched the surface when it comes to analysing its earnings; one could also consider margins, forecast growth, and return on investment, among other factors. Ultimately, this article has formed an opinion based on historical data. However, it can also be great to think about what analysts are forecasting for the future. Luckily, you can check out what analysts are forecasting by clicking here.

    This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Cpl Resources' profit. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying.

    If you decide to trade Cpl Resources, use the lowest-cost* platform that is rated #1 Overall by Barron’s, Interactive Brokers. Trade stocks, options, futures, forex, bonds and funds on 135 markets, all from a single integrated account. Promoted


    New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One Place

    We've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.

    • Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency
    • Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile
    • Track the Fair Value of your stocks

    Try a Demo Portfolio for Free

    This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
    *Interactive Brokers Rated Lowest Cost Broker by StockBrokers.com Annual Online Review 2020


    Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com.

    M
    mitchell_lawler
    mitchell_lawler

    Everyone's watching the oil price. The harder problem is the gas that can't take a detour.

    Everyone's watching the oil price. The harder problem is the gas that can't take a detour. cover
    158
    R
    Rob_Curious

    What I've learnt in the last six months is that fuel supply disruption is a real portfolio risk, and one of the better hedges is a small allocation to shipping. Though it's insane how much these have run up this year.

    f
    frank_ub3n0

    Spot on. Shipping and logistics is much larger constraint for gas than oil. Sorry to break it to you. No quick fixes for that.

    Mitchell Lawler

    What happens to energy stocks as the fix gets built?

    What happens to energy stocks as the fix gets built? cover
    Conflict around the Strait of Hormuz has led investors to oil and tankers. The trouble is, the antidote to the chokepoints is already being built, and it may not reward the same energy stocks.
    32
    Advertisement

    Weekly Picks

    CE
    Ceazar
    SPAI logo
    Ceazar on Sparc AI ·

    When GPS fails: this small cap is fixing a $54B drone problem

    Fair Value:CA$5.2532.6% undervalued
    209 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    31 users have liked this narrative
    CO
    composite32
    Emerging Author
    AROC logo
    composite32 on Archrock ·

    AI Needs Power. Power Needs Gas. Gas Needs Compression: The Archrock Investment Thesis

    Fair Value:US$44.8829.7% undervalued
    35 users have followed this narrative
    2 users have commented on this narrative
    3 users have liked this narrative
    JO
    John_Eric
    Emerging Author
    AEIS logo
    John_Eric on Advanced Energy Industries ·

    AEIS Is Firing on Every Cylinder. My Problem Is the Safety Factor.

    Fair Value:US$567.8653.8% undervalued
    22 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    7 users have liked this narrative
    IS
    LRCX logo
    isidrohg on Lam Research ·

    The Memory Shortage Is Lam's Order Book — Whether It Persists Or Resolves

    Fair Value:US$423.8532.0% undervalued
    25 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    7 users have liked this narrative

    Updated Narratives

    GE
    Genious_Trades
    TOYO logo
    Genious_Trades on TOYO ·

    The $14 Disconnect: Why the Market is not Correctly Pricing TOYO’s U.S. Solar Expansion

    Fair Value:US$1570.6% undervalued
    1 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    PU
    OMN logo
    Pubs on Omnia Holdings ·

    Omnia Holdings Limited (XJSE:OMN)

    Fair Value:R61.43101.0% overvalued
    1 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    ES
    MSCI logo
    Esteban on MSCI ·

    MSCI 04-2026

    Fair Value:US$422.630.8% overvalued
    6 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative

    Popular Narratives

    AN
    AnalystConsensusTarget
    NVDA logo
    AnalystConsensusTarget on NVIDIA ·

    NVDA: Expanding AI Demand Will Drive Major Data Center Investments Through 2026

    Fair Value:US$302.8326.6% undervalued
    1484 users have followed this narrative
    8 users have commented on this narrative
    35 users have liked this narrative
    AN
    AnalystConsensusTarget
    GOOGL logo
    AnalystConsensusTarget on Alphabet ·

    GOOGL: AI Platform Expansion And Cloud Demand Will Support Durable Performance Amid Competitive Pressures

    Fair Value:US$427.8918.3% undervalued
    1646 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    19 users have liked this narrative
    AN
    AnalystConsensusTarget
    AMZN logo
    AnalystConsensusTarget on Amazon.com ·

    AMZN: Acceleration In Cloud And AI Will Drive Margin Expansion Ahead

    Fair Value:US$32722.4% undervalued
    1662 users have followed this narrative
    1 users have commented on this narrative
    16 users have liked this narrative

    Trending Discussion

    AN
    TPG0 logo
    anthony_x0j2w on Platform Group SE KGaA ·

    Hello,(I am a shareholder).I spent the summer investigating in whatever I was able to find in the press, the trustee, or legal, and comparing it to FS Benner's declaration/transcripts:press: MM has a tendancy to use facts, modify them and turn them the way they want: 100% of their claims against TPG0 is traçable factually, 80% is flawed and interpreted. Example are numerous: 11M loans banks to be paid seems right, but it has not been an issue at all, it has been paid in full. (and it happens all the time in every business...); the previous HR becoming a financial director in the article herself being attacked by TPG on the legal side; the wrong address of curator (if truly announced by TPG).Trustee: according to my research (which can be incomplete) no communication to the Nordic trustee (hereby, bond holders) has been done on a, indebtedness (late payment) > 1M€, which is their obligation by contract (clause 14.d - https://corporate.the-platform-group.com/bond/) => this is a sign of a huge lie and fraud, or the sign that there is no indebtedness > 1M€ over the whole TPG group.Legal: still awaiting for an answer, probable that I won't get it.VALUATIONYou can spent hours working the fundamentals, if they're flawed...the thesis falls.Anyway, I always substracts the badwill (that I consider non-current - you have it in the CFS) & non-controlling interests from my valuation:Earnings ~22MFCF ~40M€The financial statements are not the issue here, we are more on an cheap option on the sincerity of the accounts that a real valuation. Unfortunately, these are unverifiable elements, hence the low price./!\ Careful:the accounts are consolidated and skip the subsidiaries issues...Careful with the business model: TPG0 is a financial holding that acquire subsidiaries, hold the debt, and has no operations. 100% of the Cash Flow comes from subs' dividends => it is a risk here, more a plumber risk than an operational one, but nevertheless...The auditor is too small, and managed by the same firm than before, with 140K€/year commission => it's too low, nobody external really reviewed what Benner and his team are doing internallycapital increase do not go through the CFS, but through change in equity AND equity in the BSIf the equity stays low too long, the WACC increase will be unbearable (I have a 30% global, with a 118% on equity): diluting is expensive => TPG machine can stay broken for a while.Most of the people I talk with never saw this, while this is ESSENTIAL to Benner's business model.SEVERAL EVENTS THAT COULD CHANGE:AEP is being audited by KPMG: if Benner plays the "we will propose KPMG to our shareholders BEOY", this can increase the trust in him significantly/KPMG (or other) to validate the 2026 IFRS accounts & having a word on HGB's: though still consolidated, at least we'll know...AEP being eventually acquired: while it carries a high integration risk due to its size, they talked about it so many times, that trust goes with it.Without this combination of event, the equity is doomed to stay at this level, IMO.Do not forget to also follow the bond: with TPG's announced safe harbor plan for buyback (25% of daily exchange), it is also interesting to check this illiquid and retail market: https://live.deutsche-boerse.com/bond/no0013256834-the-platform-group-ag-8-875-24-28?mic=XFRA

    1
    |
    0