Do Institutions Own Shares In Redcape Hotel Group (ASX:RDC)?

    A look at the shareholders of Redcape Hotel Group (ASX:RDC) can tell us which group is most powerful. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones. We also tend to see lower insider ownership in companies that were previously publicly owned.

    Redcape Hotel Group is a smaller company with a market capitalization of AU$615m, so it may still be flying under the radar of many institutional investors. In the chart below below, we can see that institutional investors have bought into the company. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholder can tell us about RDC.

    View our latest analysis for Redcape Hotel Group

    ASX:RDC Ownership Summary, August 7th 2019
    ASX:RDC Ownership Summary, August 7th 2019
    Advertisement

    What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Redcape Hotel Group?

    Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

    Redcape Hotel Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own 38% of the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Redcape Hotel Group's historic earnings and revenue, below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

    ASX:RDC Income Statement, August 7th 2019
    ASX:RDC Income Statement, August 7th 2019

    Redcape Hotel Group is not owned by hedge funds. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

    Insider Ownership Of Redcape Hotel Group

    The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

    Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

    We can see that insiders own shares in Redcape Hotel Group. As individuals, the insiders collectively own AU$11m worth of the AU$615m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

    General Public Ownership

    The general public, with a 44% stake in the company, will not easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

    Private Company Ownership

    We can see that Private Companies own 6.7%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

    Public Company Ownership

    We can see that public companies hold 9.4%, of the RDC shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure, but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

    Next Steps:

    While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

    I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

    Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

    NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

    We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

    If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.

    MI
    mitchell_lawler
    mitchell_lawler

    A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it.

    A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it. cover
    169
    ZO
    zoe_vi5fn

    Any moat with an opt-out clause for your competitors is just a fence around your own garden.

    CO
    connor_iwn1g

    Worth looking at what previous legal action actually did to Meta rather than reaching for tobacco. The FTC's record five billion dollar privacy fine in 2019 was met with the stock rising, because it came in below fears and removed an open question. GDPR was designed to constrain large platforms and increased their share of the European ad market, because compliance cost fell hardest on small intermediaries. The FTC's antitrust case, the one that could genuinely have broken the company up, was decided in Meta's favour last November. The only thing that ever meaningfully hurt the business was Apple changing a tracking default, and Meta out-spent that too, while the ad-tech firms that could not afford to rebuild disappeared. The pattern is not that Meta survives regulation. It is that regulation keeps costing its smaller competitors more.

    Andrew Legget

    Great earnings season, but are the earnings real?

    Great earnings season, but are the earnings real? cover
    At first glance, this was the strongest earnings season in years. But when you look at where the growth actually came from, the story splits into two very different pictures.
    10
    Advertisement

    Weekly Picks

    LO
    Lou_Basenese
    ONCY logo
    Lou_Basenese on Oncolytics Biotech ·

    The Team Behind a $2 Billion Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) Deal Just Took Over This $105 Million Cancer Biotech

    Fair Value:US$3.575.5% undervalued
    31 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    7 users have liked this narrative
    TR
    tripledub
    Recommended Voice
    META logo
    tripledub on Meta Platforms ·

    The $135 Billion Bet That Should Make Every Shareholder Nervous

    Fair Value:US$5861.4% undervalued
    62 users have followed this narrative
    3 users have commented on this narrative
    34 users have liked this narrative
    TA
    Talos
    Emerging Author
    VOYG logo
    Talos on Voyager Technologies ·

    The "Landlord of Orbit" – A Deep Value Play Ahead of the Starlab Era

    Fair Value:US$385.291.1% undervalued
    65 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    6 users have liked this narrative
    IV
    Emerging Author
    UBER logo
    Ivoed on Uber Technologies ·

    Uber’s Valuation Depends On Who Captures The Economics Of Driverless Rides

    Fair Value:US$11632.1% undervalued
    13 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    3 users have liked this narrative

    Updated Narratives

    RO
    Robbo
    ULVR logo
    Robbo on Unilever ·

    Unilever (LSE:ULVR), changes in the wind.

    Fair Value:UK£42.2813.0% overvalued
    1 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    TR
    tripledub
    DSK logo
    tripledub on Dusk Group ·

    Buying a Dollar for Fifty Cents: The Case for Dusk Group

    Fair Value:AU$0.790.6% undervalued
    24 users have followed this narrative
    3 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    TR
    tripledub
    TSM logo
    tripledub on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing ·

    The Most Wonderful Monopoly in the Most Dangerous Neighbourhood on Earth

    Fair Value:US$378.2910.4% overvalued
    84 users have followed this narrative
    1 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative

    Popular Narratives

    OS
    oscargarcia
    NVDA logo
    oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

    The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

    Fair Value:US$28022.3% undervalued
    363 users have followed this narrative
    9 users have commented on this narrative
    16 users have liked this narrative
    CU
    MSFT logo
    CubanEros on Microsoft ·

    A wonderful business at reasonable price.

    Fair Value:US$419.9122.3% overvalued
    212 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    9 users have liked this narrative
    JO
    John_Eric
    Emerging Author
    MELI logo
    John_Eric on MercadoLibre ·

    MercadoLibre and the Spreadsheet Trick That Decides Everything

    Fair Value:US$7.31k73.1% undervalued
    125 users have followed this narrative
    3 users have commented on this narrative
    17 users have liked this narrative

    Trending Discussion