- Sweden
- /
- Commercial Services
- /
- OM:ITAB
Do Insiders Own Shares In ITAB Shop Concept AB (publ) (STO:ITAB B)?
If you want to know who really controls ITAB Shop Concept AB (publ) (STO:ITAB B), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies. I quite like to see at least a little bit of insider ownership. As Charlie Munger said 'Show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome.'
ITAB Shop Concept is a smaller company with a market capitalization of kr2.7b, so it may still be flying under the radar of many institutional investors. In the chart below below, we can see that institutions are noticeable on the share registry. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about ITAB B.
View our latest analysis for ITAB Shop Concept
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ITAB Shop Concept?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
We can see that ITAB Shop Concept does have institutional investors; and they hold 23% of the stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone, since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of ITAB Shop Concept, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in ITAB Shop Concept. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
Insider Ownership Of ITAB Shop Concept
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board; and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board, themselves.
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of ITAB Shop Concept AB (publ). Insiders own kr867m worth of shares in the kr2.7b company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
General Public Ownership
The general public, with a 10% stake in the company, will not easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
Private Equity Ownership
With a stake of 30%, private equity firms could influence the ITAB B board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
Private Company Ownership
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 4.8%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
Next Steps:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.
If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.
About OM:ITAB
ITAB Group
Develops, manufactures, sells, and installs store concepts for retail chain stores.
Undervalued with reasonable growth potential.
Similar Companies
Market Insights
Weekly Picks

When GPS fails: this small cap is fixing a $54B drone problem

Why Amdocs is a high conviction Buy for me?
Why SBM Offshore’s €30 Share Price May Be Too Harsh On Its Backlog

One of China's Fastest-Growing Restaurant Chains Trades on Just 7x Earnings and an 8% Dividend
Recently Updated Narratives
Diagnostyka SA: Solidny lider, który już nie jest tani
The Reinsurance Transition Is Doing The Growth
Negative Free Cash Flow For The First Time In A Second Quarter
Popular Narratives

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.
A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Warren Buffett Just Bet $10 Billion on Google. The Catch? You May Already Be Too Late.
Trending Discussion
As someone who has dealt directly with them as a CTO for a credit union, I have 8 years of horror stories about doing business with them. If there was any other competitor than could deliver 80% of Fiserv services, there would be a mad rush to migrate to them. They should thank their lucky stars they are a near monopoly. this industry is so ripe for a well funded competitor. Their integration of technology is awful, their ability to fix their own implementation screwups is sadly tragic. Sometimes they just silently kill support tickets without resolution and you never find out until you do a follow up inquiry. Why, because sometimes no one you are dealing with knows how to fix it and knows no one to ask for help. They can not meet their own implementation deadlines and sometimes there is no one on a technical team dealing with you that has any banking or credit union experience. The is an industry insider phrase when you meet other Fiserv customers called being "Fiserved". It means telling others of your worst stories of dealing with them. Ask around, all CTO's have some doozies.


