at Home Group (LON:PETS) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk'. So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. Importantly, Pets at Home Group Plc (LON:PETS) does carry debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

Advertisement

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

See our latest analysis for at Home Group

What Is at Home Group's Net Debt?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that at Home Group had UK£179.0m of debt in October 2019, down from UK£192.6m, one year before. However, it also had UK£44.7m in cash, and so its net debt is UK£134.3m.

LSE:PETS Historical Debt, February 14th 2020
LSE:PETS Historical Debt, February 14th 2020

How Strong Is at Home Group's Balance Sheet?

The latest balance sheet data shows that at Home Group had liabilities of UK£285.4m due within a year, and liabilities of UK£591.0m falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of UK£44.7m as well as receivables valued at UK£65.5m due within 12 months. So its liabilities total UK£766.1m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since at Home Group has a market capitalization of UK£1.55b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt.

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

at Home Group has net debt of just 1.1 times EBITDA, indicating that it is certainly not a reckless borrower. And this view is supported by the solid interest coverage, with EBIT coming in at 8.2 times the interest expense over the last year. On top of that, at Home Group grew its EBIT by 84% over the last twelve months, and that growth will make it easier to handle its debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if at Home Group can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Happily for any shareholders, at Home Group actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT over the last three years. That sort of strong cash conversion gets us as excited as the crowd when the beat drops at a Daft Punk concert.

Our View

Happily, at Home Group's impressive conversion of EBIT to free cash flow implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But, on a more sombre note, we are a little concerned by its level of total liabilities. Zooming out, at Home Group seems to use debt quite reasonably; and that gets the nod from us. After all, sensible leverage can boost returns on equity. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for at Home Group that you should be aware of before investing here.

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Thank you for reading.

mitchell_lawler

Micron (MU) is booming, and it still doesn't look ‘expensive’ based on next year's earnings. So why does our own valuation say it could be worth 40% less?

1510
zoe_vi5fn

A low price to earnings ratio at the top of the cycle is a warning rather than a bargain, and a terrifyingly high one at the bottom is often the entry point

darius_xnnrd

Memory used to have a dozen participants racing each other into oversupply, and now it has three. High bandwidth memory is qualified into customer designs years ahead, sold under long-term agreements, and is far harder to switch away from than commodity DRAM.

About LSE:PETS

Pets at Home Group

Engages in the omnichannel retailing of pet food, pet related products, and pet accessories in the United Kingdom.

Adequate balance sheet second-rate dividend payer.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

RI
Rick_Orford
FJET logo
Rick_Orford on Starfighters Space ·

The 1960s Fighter Jet That Could Crack Open a $20 Billion Satellite Market

Fair Value:US$515.2% undervalued
27 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
5 users have liked this narrative
FU
FundamentalFlow
VRT logo
FundamentalFlow on Vertiv Holdings Co ·

The Short and Long Term Compounder of Liquid Cooling industry.

Fair Value:US$45034.7% undervalued
56 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
13 users have liked this narrative
JO
John_Eric
SPXC logo
John_Eric on SPX Technologies ·

I Fell in Love With a Data-Center Cooling Stock. Then I Opened the Filings.

Fair Value:US$2037.1% overvalued
21 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
6 users have liked this narrative
TR
tripledub
GQG logo
tripledub on GQG Partners ·

The Cheap Genius Problem

Fair Value:AU$3.2155.0% undervalued
33 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
22 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

CO
Conrad_Egusa
CIBEST logo
Conrad_Egusa on Grupo Cibest ·

Why Bancolombia’s undervaluation offers investment upside

Fair Value:Col$91.69k4.0% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
GE
LEAD logo
GeraldBuffet on Logindo Samudramakmur ·

LEAD: The Offshore Recovery Opportunity

Fair Value:Rp95588.8% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
ON
LOT logo
Ontological on Lotus Technology ·

Lotus Tech, Finloop and FOMO Pay Collaborate to Explore Vehicle Tokenization

Fair Value:US$2.456.3% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

OS
oscargarcia
NVDA logo
oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

Fair Value:US$28019.6% undervalued
309 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
CU
MSFT logo
CubanEros on Microsoft ·

A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Fair Value:US$419.9118.0% overvalued
168 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative
KI
AMZN logo
KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

Fair Value:US$475.0944.7% undervalued
189 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative