Loading...
LOVL.Q logo

Spark Networks SEOTCPK:LOVL.Q Stok Raporu

Piyasa Değeri US$2.6k
Hisse Fiyatı
n/a
Adil Değerim
Kullanılamıyor
1Y-100.0%
7D0%
1D
Portföy Değeri
​
Görünüm

Spark Networks SE

OTCPK:LOVL.Q Stok Raporu

Piyasa değeri: US$2.6k

This company listing is no longer active

This company may still be operating, however this listing is no longer active. Find out why through their latest events.

Spark Networks (LOVL.Q) Hisse Özeti

Operates online dating sites and mobile applications in the he United States, Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom, and France. Daha fazla detay

LOVL.Q temel anali̇z
Kar Tanesi Skoru
Değerleme2/6
Gelecekteki Büyüme0/6
Geçmiş Performans0/6
Finansal Sağlık0/6
Temettüler0/6

Risk Analizi

Negatif hissedar öz sermayesi

Anlamlı bir piyasa değeri yok ( $3K )

Gelir, geçen yıl 15.2% oranında azaldı

Hisse senetleri oldukça likit değildir

+ 1 daha fazla risk

LOVL.Q Community Fair Values

Create Narrative

See what others think this stock is worth. Follow their fair value or set your own to get alerts.

View all narratives

Spark Networks SE Rakipler

Fiyat Geçmişi ve Performans

Hisse fiyatlarındaki yükseliş, düşüş ve değişimlerin özeti Spark Networks
Tarihsel hisse senedi fiyatları
Güncel Hisse FiyatıUS$0.0001
52 Haftanın En Yüksek SeviyesiUS$0.45
52 Haftanın En Düşük SeviyesiUS$0.000001
Beta0.68
1 Aylık Değişim9,900.00%
3 Aylık Değişim-96.67%
1 Yıllık Değişim-99.96%
3 Yıllık Değişim-100.00%
5 Yıllık Değişim-100.00%
Halka arzdan bu yana değişim-100.00%

Son Haberler & Güncellemeler

Recent updates

Analiz Makalesi • Feb 25

Spark Networks (NASDAQ:LOV) Use Of Debt Could Be Considered Risky

The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says...
Seeking Alpha • Oct 17

Spark Networks: The Ugly Girl At The Prom

Summary Spark Networks has shown little improvement in recent months. Insiders aren’t touching the stock. Other than a buyout, I see limited upside. Management doesn't seem to have a plan for how to improve operations. Update & Thesis Back in June, I wrote a piece comparing Match Group (MTCH) and Spark Networks (LOV). In summary, I gave Match a "hold" since I disliked the company but didn't have enough of a reason to initiate a bearish view. I gave Spark a "sell" based on their business models and income statements. Match is down 41% since the publication and Spark is down 45%. While both stocks have decreased in value, I will credit the bear market for the decline instead of my foresight. I still believe Spark has much more room to fall if they continue the status quo. There has been no observable improvement in the business model flaws discussed in my last writing. Spark Networks is an online dating conglomerate with 12 different platforms. Prior to the Zoosk acquisition, the company mainly operated dating sites on an exclusionary basis and did not utilize the Networking Effect. For example, Jdate is likely to discourage a Christian from using the platform. Even more odd is that Spark operates JSwipe as a second separate Jewish-based dating platform. Why would a business compartmentalize such a specific demographic and not merge them? This would be akin to Amazon (AMZN) operating completely separate sites for adults under 30 and over 30. Spark Networks Subsidiaries (Spark Networks) In my opinion, this is a terrible business strategy and the company's financials prove it to be true. As discussed in my last piece on Spark, the business model limits the company's scalability. What's peculiar is I believe this flaw is extremely obvious and can't comprehend how management doesn't see it. Transcripts are full of excuses with no results. I see no positive long-term prospects for Spark Networks other than a possible buyout. Management: Excuses, Excuses Sparks failed to capitalize on the Covid lockdowns like other dating companies have. As you can see here, the company did grow their revenue during the lockdown period. This was the opportunity of a lifetime for online dating companies: in-person dating was put on hold and the only way to mingle was through the internet. If Spark was going to grow its user base, this was the time to do so. It is now October 2022, a full 30 months since the start of Covid. As you can see from the income statement, the company is now recording losses in operating and net income now that the lockdowns are over. Other than the Zoosk acquisition, the company still hasn't pivoted away from its exclusivity business model. Transcripts show what I believe to be a lack of direction on management's part. The absence of insider purchases even as the stock price declined this year suggests a lack of belief. Below are some quotes from the CEO, none of which give me confidence in the company for the long term. "We saw an increase in fraud on our SilverSingles and EliteSingles platform, which we believe led to lower performance versus our expectations." "Our Board has been highly engaged with the company's external financial, legal and strategic advisers to identify and assess a range of alternatives to enhance Spark's value" "We are working to simplify our technology infrastructure by moving our primary brands from 3 platforms to 2. While we have made good progress in our plan, we prioritize some of our resources to focus on safety, delaying our transition to H1 next year." "We continue to make progress on getting Zoosk back to growth." "If you have subscribers that are going to renew but had a bad experience, they wouldn't renew." - CEO Eric Eichmann To be fair, management did make statements that can inspire some optimism. The company restructured its debt, by negotiating a package with MGG Investment Group, and which you can read about in detail here. In short, the company elected to take on more debt but with a longer maturity date. As you can see on Spark's balance sheet, long-term debt increased from $85M to $105M YOY. Total Cash on hand remained roughly flat from the June 2021 quarter as well. So why am I still bearish? The concern here is not that the business has challenges, such as fraud and security on the platforms. The concern is that Spark's competitors such as Bumble (BMBL) and Tinder are meeting them head on and continue to be top companies in the industry while Spark Networks is stalled. From a financial standpoint, both competitors mentioned have a history of profitability. 5-Year Net Income (Seeking Alpha) From an operational standpoint, Spark's competitors are already delivering value to their user base. Match is looking to add features to its platform and does not appear not focused on restructuring debt. Bumble and Tinder are also extremely simple to use, which is why I believe their user base is so engaged. These quotes suggest to me that management is behind the curve and playing catch-up. The statements are focused on correcting past mistakes rather than specific plans of how they will grow their user base. This suggests to me that management doesn't have what it takes to be an innovator in the online dating space. Further proof of this is Spark's largest platform based on number of users is Zoosk, which came from an acquisition and not from organic growth. Zoosk is also ranked #11 in total users according to Business Of Apps. Zoosk has also decreased in rank since 2015 as the images below show. It should also be noted that five of the 2021 top 10 dating platforms are owned by Match Group: Tinder, Plenty of Fish, Hinge, OkCupid, and Match. Bumble has two in the top 10 as Bumble owns Badoo.
Seeking Alpha • Aug 09

Spark Networks reports Q2 results; narrows FY22 soft guidance

Spark Networks press release (NASDAQ:LOV): Q2 net loss was $8.8M, compared to $49.0M in the second quarter of 2021. Adjusted EBITDA loss was $1.7M, compared to Adjusted EBITDA of $8.6M in the second quarter of 2021. Revenue of $48.04M (-13.0% Y/Y). Total paid subscribers grew from 831,000 to 838,000 sequentially in the second quarter.  "We now expect total revenue for the year to be down low to mid-single digits on a percentage basis as compared to 2021. On a constant currency basis, we expect full-year 2022 revenue to be consistent with full-year 2021 revenue. On the profitability side, although we expect full-year Adjusted EBITDA to be lower than previously anticipated, we expect to deliver low double-digit Adjusted EBITDA margins for the full year."
Analiz Makalesi • Jun 07

Spark Networks (NASDAQ:LOV) Takes On Some Risk With Its Use Of Debt

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to...
Seeking Alpha • Jun 02

Spark Networks: Love Might Be In The Air Again

Today, we take our first in-depth look at Spark Networks in over two years. This dating site operator has been severely impacted by the pandemic. Can the shares turn around as the coronavirus outbreak ebbs? A full investment analysis follows in the paragraphs below.
Analiz Makalesi • Apr 05

Does Spark Networks (NYSEMKT:LOV) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the...
Analiz Makalesi • Mar 08

How Much Did Spark Networks'(NYSEMKT:LOV) Shareholders Earn From Share Price Movements Over The Last Three Years?

Spark Networks SE ( NYSEMKT:LOV ) shareholders should be happy to see the share price up 11% in the last quarter. But...
Analiz Makalesi • Feb 01

Spark Networks SE's (NYSEMKT:LOV) About To Shift From Loss To Profit

Spark Networks SE ( NYSEMKT:LOV ) is possibly approaching a major achievement in its business, so we would like to...
Analiz Makalesi • Dec 26

What Type Of Shareholders Own The Most Number of Spark Networks SE (NYSEMKT:LOV) Shares?

The big shareholder groups in Spark Networks SE ( NYSEMKT:LOV ) have power over the company. Insiders often own a large...
Analiz Makalesi • Nov 30

Spark Networks'(NYSEMKT:LOV) Share Price Is Down 54% Over The Past Three Years.

The truth is that if you invest for long enough, you're going to end up with some losing stocks. But long term Spark...

Hissedar Getirileri

LOVL.QUS Interactive Media and ServicesUS Pazar
7D0%-5.6%1.2%
1Y-100.0%58.2%27.0%

Getiri vs. Endüstri: LOVL.Q geçen yıl % 58.2 oranında getiri sağlayan US Interactive Media and Services sektörünün gerisinde kaldı.

Getiri vs Piyasa: LOVL.Q geçen yıl % 27 oranında getiri sağlayan US Piyasasının altında performans gösterdi.

Fiyat Oynaklığı

Is LOVL.Q's price volatile compared to industry and market?
LOVL.Q volatility
LOVL.Q Average Weekly Movementn/a
Interactive Media and Services Industry Average Movement8.7%
Market Average Movement7.2%
10% most volatile stocks in US Market16.9%
10% least volatile stocks in US Market3.0%

İstikrarlı Hisse Senedi Fiyatı: LOVL.Q hisse senedi fiyatı, son 3 ayda US piyasasına kıyasla dalgalı seyretti.

Zaman İçindeki Volatilite: LOVL.Q 'un son bir yıldaki oynaklık değişimini belirlemek için Yetersiz veri.

Şirket Hakkında

KurulduÇalışanlarCEOWeb sitesi
n/a271Adam Medroswww.spark.net

Spark Networks SE Temel Bilgiler Özeti

Spark Networks'un kazançları ve gelirleri piyasa değeriyle nasıl karşılaştırılır?
LOVL.Q temel i̇stati̇sti̇kler
Piyasa değeriUS$2.63k
Kazançlar(TTM)-US$59.24m
Gelir(TTM)US$172.36m
0.0x
P/S Oranı
0.0x
F/K Oranı

LOVL.Q aşırı değerli mi?

Gerçeğe Uygun Değer ve değerleme analizine bakınız

Kazanç ve Gelir

En son kazanç raporundan temel karlılık istatistikleri (TTM)
LOVL.Q gelir tablosu (TTM)
GelirUS$172.36m
Gelir MaliyetiUS$97.39m
Brüt KârUS$74.98m
Diğer GiderlerUS$134.22m
Kazançlar-US$59.24m

Son Raporlanan Kazançlar

Jun 30, 2023

Sonraki Kazanç Tarihi

n/a

Hisse başına kazanç (EPS)-2.26
Brüt Marj43.50%
Net Kâr Marjı-34.37%
Borç/Özkaynak Oranı-278.3%

LOVL.Q uzun vadede nasıl bir performans gösterdi?

Geçmiş performansı ve karşılaştırmayı görün

Şirket Analizi ve Finansal Veri Durumu

VeriSon Güncelleme (UTC saati)
Şirket Analizi2024/07/13 05:40
Gün Sonu Hisse Fiyatı2024/07/08 00:00
Kazançlar2023/06/30
Yıllık Kazançlar2022/12/31

Veri Kaynakları

Şirket analizimizde kullanılan veriler S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC'den alınmıştır. Bu raporu oluşturmak için analiz modelimizde aşağıdaki veriler kullanılmıştır. Veriler normalize edilmiştir, bu da kaynağın mevcut olmasından kaynaklanan bir gecikmeye neden olabilir.

PaketVeriZaman ÇerçevesiÖrnek ABD Kaynağı *
Şirket Finansalları10 yıl
  • Gelir tablosu
  • Nakit akış tablosu
  • Bilanço
Analist Konsensüs Tahminleri+3 yıl
  • Finansal tahminler
  • Analist fiyat hedefleri
Piyasa Fiyatları30 yıl
  • Hisse senedi fiyatları
  • Temettüler, Bölünmeler ve Eylemler
Sahiplik10 yıl
  • En büyük hissedarlar
  • İçeriden öğrenenlerin ticareti
Yönetim10 yıl
  • Liderlik ekibi
  • Yönetim Kurulu
Önemli Gelişmeler10 yıl
  • Şirket duyuruları

* ABD menkul kıymetleri için örnek, ABD dışı için eşdeğer düzenleyici formlar ve kaynaklar kullanılmıştır.

Belirtilmediği sürece tüm finansal veriler yıllık bir döneme dayanmaktadır ancak üç ayda bir güncellenmektedir. Bu, İzleyen On İki Ay (TTM) veya Son On İki Ay (LTM) Verileri olarak bilinir. Daha fazla bilgi edinin.

Analiz Modeli ve Kar Tanesi

Bu raporu oluşturmak için kullanılan analiz modelinin ayrıntılarına GitHub sayfamızdan ulaşabilirsiniz, ayrıca raporlarımızı nasıl kullanacağınızı anlatan kılavuzlarımız ve Youtube'da eğitim videolarımız da bulunmaktadır.

Simply Wall St analiz modelini tasarlayan ve oluşturan dünya standartlarındaki ekip hakkında bilgi edinin.

Endüstri ve Sektör Metrikleri

Sektör ve bölüm metriklerimiz Simply Wall St tarafından her 6 saatte bir hesaplanmaktadır, sürecimizin ayrıntıları Github'da mevcuttur.

Analist Kaynakları

Spark Networks SE 2 Bu analistlerden 0, raporumuzun girdisi olarak kullanılan gelir veya kazanç tahminlerini sunmuştur. Analistlerin gönderimleri gün boyunca güncellenmektedir.

AnalistKurum
Rajiv SharmaB. Riley Securities, Inc.
Austin MoldowCanaccord Genuity