Is Now The Time To Reassess GitLab (GTLB) After Recent Share Price Rebound?

  • Wondering whether GitLab at around US$31.82 is offering value or just volatility? This article breaks down what the current price may be telling you.
  • Over the past week the stock is up 18.9%, and over the last 30 days it is up 32.3%, yet year to date it is still down 12.1% and over the last year it has fallen 31.8%.
  • These swings are set against a backdrop of ongoing attention on software and developer productivity platforms, where investors are weighing long term adoption trends against changing risk appetite. Evergreen coverage like this aims to step back from short term headlines and focus on what the current share price may imply about long term expectations.
  • GitLab currently scores a 3 out of 6 valuation check score. Next you will see how that stacks up under cash flow models, multiples, and an alternative way of thinking about value that brings the story together at the end of the article.

Find out why GitLab's -31.8% return over the last year is lagging behind its peers.

Advertisement

Approach 1: GitLab Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

A Discounted Cash Flow, or DCF, model takes estimates of the cash a company may generate in the future and discounts those amounts back to today to arrive at an estimate of what the stock could be worth now.

For GitLab, the model used is a 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity approach. The latest twelve month free cash flow is reported at $222.93 million, and analyst based projections plus Simply Wall St extrapolations extend out to 2035. For example, projected free cash flow for 2031 is $515.05 million, with intermediate years such as 2026 and 2027 estimated at $208.55 million and $216.80 million respectively, before discounting.

After discounting these projected cash flows back to today, the model produces an estimated intrinsic value of $55.34 per share. Compared with the recent share price around $31.82, this framework suggests GitLab stock is trading at about a 42.5% discount to that DCF estimate, which points to a meaningful gap between price and this cash flow based value view.

Result: UNDERVALUED

Our Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis suggests GitLab is undervalued by 42.5%. Track this in your watchlist or portfolio, or discover 46 more high quality undervalued stocks.

GTLB Discounted Cash Flow as at Jun 2026
GTLB Discounted Cash Flow as at Jun 2026

Head to the Valuation section of our Company Report for more details on how we arrive at this Fair Value for GitLab.

Approach 2: GitLab Price vs Sales

For companies where profits are limited or still developing, the P/S ratio often gives a clearer picture of how the market is valuing each dollar of revenue. It sidesteps near term earnings noise and lets you compare what you are paying for current sales.

What counts as a “normal” P/S depends on what investors expect for future growth and how much risk they see in the business. Higher expected growth or lower perceived risk can justify a higher multiple, while slower growth or higher risk tends to pull that multiple down.

GitLab trades on a P/S of 5.62x, compared with the Software industry average of 3.87x and a peer average of 4.21x. Simply Wall St’s Fair Ratio for GitLab is 6.36x, which is a proprietary estimate of what the P/S could be given factors like earnings growth, industry, profit margin, market cap and risk profile. This Fair Ratio can be more tailored than a simple comparison to peers or industry averages because it adjusts for GitLab’s specific characteristics rather than treating all software companies as identical. With the current 5.62x P/S sitting below the 6.36x Fair Ratio, the stock screens as trading below that Fair Ratio estimate.

Result: UNDERVALUED

NasdaqGS:GTLB P/S Ratio as at Jun 2026
NasdaqGS:GTLB P/S Ratio as at Jun 2026

P/S ratios tell one story, but what if the real opportunity lies elsewhere? Start investing in legacies, not executives. Discover our 20 top founder-led companies.

Upgrade Your Decision Making: Choose your GitLab Narrative

Earlier it was mentioned that there is an even better way to understand valuation. Meet Narratives, where you attach a clear story about GitLab to your own forecast for revenue, earnings and margins, link that forecast to a Fair Value, and then compare it with the current price to decide whether the stock looks attractive or stretched.

On Simply Wall St, Narratives sit inside the Community page and are used by millions of investors as an accessible tool that connects qualitative views to the numbers. Narratives update automatically when fresh news or earnings arrive and help you see, for example, how one GitLab investor might anchor on a higher Fair Value around US$72.00 while another leans toward the more cautious US$24.00 view. Both perspectives are laid out transparently so you can decide which story, and which Fair Value, aligns better with your own expectations.

For GitLab, we’ll make it really easy for you with previews of two leading GitLab Narratives:

🐂 GitLab Bull Case

Fair Value: US$72.00 per share

Implied discount to this fair value from the recent US$31.82 price: about 56%

Revenue growth assumption used in this narrative: 25.8% a year

  • AI driven development and security workflows on GitLab are expected to support higher activity on the platform and potentially faster annual recurring revenue growth than seat growth alone.
  • Analysts in this camp model earnings reaching about US$224.0m and earnings per share of US$1.19 by around December 2028, assuming profit margins move toward the broader US software industry level.
  • To line up with this view, the stock would need to trade on a P/E of 77.1x those 2028 earnings, which is a higher multiple than the current US software industry P/E cited in the narrative.

🐻 GitLab Bear Case

Fair Value: about US$30.30 per share

Implied premium to this fair value from the recent US$31.82 price: about 5%

Revenue growth assumption used in this narrative: 15.3% a year

  • Analysts behind this narrative see solid AI and security features and partnerships, but think rising competition, slower net new customer additions and business model shifts could limit how much of that flows through to long term earnings.
  • The assumptions used include revenue of about US$1.5b and earnings of US$187.4m by 2029, with the stock valued on a P/E of 38.3x those earnings and a discount rate of 8.5%.
  • They also flag execution risks around go to market changes, the move to hybrid seat plus usage pricing, and softer small business demand, which could all affect revenue growth and margin expansion.

If you want to see how these GitLab stories are built, including all the earnings, cash flow and multiple assumptions, you can step through the full Community Narratives and compare them with your own expectations for the stock See what the community is saying about GitLab.

Do you think there's more to the story for GitLab? Head over to our Community to see what others are saying!

NasdaqGS:GTLB 1-Year Stock Price Chart
NasdaqGS:GTLB 1-Year Stock Price Chart

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One Place

We've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.

• Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency
• Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile
• Track the Fair Value of your stocks

Try a Demo Portfolio for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

M
mitchell_lawler
mitchell_lawler

A lot of companies don't have a moat, they have customers too busy to switch. AI agents could change that.

99
L
LeverageIsLovely

Meta built an agent that saves you time so you can spend it on Meta.

s
sarah_c5otv

It can only change a little. Adopting AI agents will in itself be a HUGE friction for many.

Andrew Legget

Are social media stocks the new Big Tobacco?

Are social media stocks the new Big Tobacco? cover
Greater regulatory scrutiny is catching up with digital platforms, posing a rising risk for social media stocks. But as Big Tobacco discovered, that's not always a bad outcome for shareholders.
14

About NasdaqGS:GTLB

GitLab

Develops software for the software development lifecycle in the United States, Europe, and the Asia Pacific.

Flawless balance sheet and slightly overvalued.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

CE
Ceazar
SPAI logo
Ceazar on Sparc AI ·

When GPS fails: this small cap is fixing a $54B drone problem

Fair Value:CA$5.2541.1% undervalued
196 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
29 users have liked this narrative
CO
composite32
Emerging Author
AROC logo
composite32 on Archrock ·

AI Needs Power. Power Needs Gas. Gas Needs Compression: The Archrock Investment Thesis

Fair Value:US$44.8831.9% undervalued
10 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
1 users have liked this narrative
JO
John_Eric
Emerging Author
AEIS logo
John_Eric on Advanced Energy Industries ·

AEIS Is Firing on Every Cylinder. My Problem Is the Safety Factor.

Fair Value:US$567.8655.9% undervalued
7 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
7 users have liked this narrative
IS
LRCX logo
isidrohg on Lam Research ·

The Memory Shortage Is Lam's Order Book — Whether It Persists Or Resolves

Fair Value:US$423.8536.1% undervalued
10 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
4 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

BR
Brunhilde_Wagner
CPRT logo
Brunhilde_Wagner on Copart ·

Compounder to Cash Generator in Real Time

Fair Value:US$2524.2% overvalued
2 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
EV
CHG logo
evadav on Chemring Group ·

Chemring remains a strong long term defence holding

Fair Value:UK£6.3515.8% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
LU
LunaRodas
TCOM logo
LunaRodas on Trip.com Group ·

TCOM | Trip.com Group Limited: What They Said vs. What They Did

Fair Value:US$46.8316.2% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

AN
AnalystConsensusTarget
NVDA logo
AnalystConsensusTarget on NVIDIA ·

NVDA: Expanding AI Demand Will Drive Major Data Center Investments Through 2026

Fair Value:US$302.8329.9% undervalued
1453 users have followed this narrative
8 users have commented on this narrative
35 users have liked this narrative
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget
GOOGL logo
AnalystConsensusTarget on Alphabet ·

GOOGL: AI Platform Expansion And Cloud Demand Will Support Durable Performance Amid Competitive Pressures

Fair Value:US$427.8919.4% undervalued
1628 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
19 users have liked this narrative
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget
AMZN logo
AnalystConsensusTarget on Amazon.com ·

AMZN: Acceleration In Cloud And AI Will Drive Margin Expansion Ahead

Fair Value:US$32724.0% undervalued
1644 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

AN
TPG0 logo
anthony_x0j2w on Platform Group SE KGaA ·

Hello,(I am a shareholder).I spent the summer investigating in whatever I was able to find in the press, the trustee, or legal, and comparing it to FS Benner's declaration/transcripts:press: MM has a tendancy to use facts, modify them and turn them the way they want: 100% of their claims against TPG0 is traçable factually, 80% is flawed and interpreted. Example are numerous: 11M loans banks to be paid seems right, but it has not been an issue at all, it has been paid in full. (and it happens all the time in every business...); the previous HR becoming a financial director in the article herself being attacked by TPG on the legal side; the wrong address of curator (if truly announced by TPG).Trustee: according to my research (which can be incomplete) no communication to the Nordic trustee (hereby, bond holders) has been done on a, indebtedness (late payment) > 1M€, which is their obligation by contract (clause 14.d - https://corporate.the-platform-group.com/bond/) => this is a sign of a huge lie and fraud, or the sign that there is no indebtedness > 1M€ over the whole TPG group.Legal: still awaiting for an answer, probable that I won't get it.VALUATIONYou can spent hours working the fundamentals, if they're flawed...the thesis falls.Anyway, I always substracts the badwill (that I consider non-current - you have it in the CFS) & non-controlling interests from my valuation:Earnings ~22MFCF ~40M€The financial statements are not the issue here, we are more on an cheap option on the sincerity of the accounts that a real valuation. Unfortunately, these are unverifiable elements, hence the low price./!\ Careful:the accounts are consolidated and skip the subsidiaries issues...Careful with the business model: TPG0 is a financial holding that acquire subsidiaries, hold the debt, and has no operations. 100% of the Cash Flow comes from subs' dividends => it is a risk here, more a plumber risk than an operational one, but nevertheless...The auditor is too small, and managed by the same firm than before, with 140K€/year commission => it's too low, nobody external really reviewed what Benner and his team are doing internallycapital increase do not go through the CFS, but through change in equity AND equity in the BSIf the equity stays low too long, the WACC increase will be unbearable (I have a 30% global, with a 118% on equity): diluting is expensive => TPG machine can stay broken for a while.Most of the people I talk with never saw this, while this is ESSENTIAL to Benner's business model.SEVERAL EVENTS THAT COULD CHANGE:AEP is being audited by KPMG: if Benner plays the "we will propose KPMG to our shareholders BEOY", this can increase the trust in him significantly/KPMG (or other) to validate the 2026 IFRS accounts & having a word on HGB's: though still consolidated, at least we'll know...AEP being eventually acquired: while it carries a high integration risk due to its size, they talked about it so many times, that trust goes with it.Without this combination of event, the equity is doomed to stay at this level, IMO.Do not forget to also follow the bond: with TPG's announced safe harbor plan for buyback (25% of daily exchange), it is also interesting to check this illiquid and retail market: https://live.deutsche-boerse.com/bond/no0013256834-the-platform-group-ag-8-875-24-28?mic=XFRA

1
|
0