Is Farfetch (NYSE:FTCH) Weighed On By Its Debt Load?

Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. Importantly, Farfetch Limited (NYSE:FTCH) does carry debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

Advertisement

When Is Debt A Problem?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

See our latest analysis for Farfetch

What Is Farfetch's Net Debt?

As you can see below, at the end of March 2023, Farfetch had US$908.4m of debt, up from US$530.1m a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it also had US$485.9m in cash, and so its net debt is US$422.5m.

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:FTCH Debt to Equity History May 30th 2023

How Healthy Is Farfetch's Balance Sheet?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Farfetch had liabilities of US$786.3m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$1.90b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$485.9m and US$533.4m worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$1.66b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

This is a mountain of leverage relative to its market capitalization of US$1.86b. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Farfetch can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

Over 12 months, Farfetch reported revenue of US$2.4b, which is a gain of 3.1%, although it did not report any earnings before interest and tax. We usually like to see faster growth from unprofitable companies, but each to their own.

Caveat Emptor

Importantly, Farfetch had an earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) loss over the last year. Indeed, it lost a very considerable US$721m at the EBIT level. Considering that alongside the liabilities mentioned above does not give us much confidence that company should be using so much debt. Quite frankly we think the balance sheet is far from match-fit, although it could be improved with time. However, it doesn't help that it burned through US$543m of cash over the last year. So suffice it to say we consider the stock very risky. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example - Farfetch has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

New: AI Stock Screener & Alerts

Our new AI Stock Screener scans the market every day to uncover opportunities.

• Dividend Powerhouses (3%+ Yield)
• Undervalued Small Caps with Insider Buying
• High growth Tech and AI Companies

Or build your own from over 50 metrics.

Explore Now for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

MI
mitchell_lawler
mitchell_lawler

A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it.

A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it. cover
179
ZO
zoe_vi5fn

Any moat with an opt-out clause for your competitors is just a fence around your own garden.

CO
connor_iwn1g

Worth looking at what previous legal action actually did to Meta rather than reaching for tobacco. The FTC's record five billion dollar privacy fine in 2019 was met with the stock rising, because it came in below fears and removed an open question. GDPR was designed to constrain large platforms and increased their share of the European ad market, because compliance cost fell hardest on small intermediaries. The FTC's antitrust case, the one that could genuinely have broken the company up, was decided in Meta's favour last November. The only thing that ever meaningfully hurt the business was Apple changing a tracking default, and Meta out-spent that too, while the ad-tech firms that could not afford to rebuild disappeared. The pattern is not that Meta survives regulation. It is that regulation keeps costing its smaller competitors more.

Andrew Legget

Great earnings season, but are the earnings real?

Great earnings season, but are the earnings real? cover
At first glance, this was the strongest earnings season in years. But when you look at where the growth actually came from, the story splits into two very different pictures.
10

About OTCPK:FTCH.Q

Farfetch

Operates a platform for the luxury fashion industry in the United States, the United Kingdom, and internationally.

Low risk with weak fundamentals.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

LO
Lou_Basenese
ONCY logo
Lou_Basenese on Oncolytics Biotech ·

The Team Behind a $2 Billion Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) Deal Just Took Over This $105 Million Cancer Biotech

Fair Value:US$3.575.5% undervalued
31 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
7 users have liked this narrative
TR
tripledub
Recommended Voice
META logo
tripledub on Meta Platforms ·

The $135 Billion Bet That Should Make Every Shareholder Nervous

Fair Value:US$5861.4% undervalued
62 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
34 users have liked this narrative
TA
Talos
Emerging Author
VOYG logo
Talos on Voyager Technologies ·

The "Landlord of Orbit" – A Deep Value Play Ahead of the Starlab Era

Fair Value:US$385.291.1% undervalued
65 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
6 users have liked this narrative
IV
Emerging Author
UBER logo
Ivoed on Uber Technologies ·

Uber’s Valuation Depends On Who Captures The Economics Of Driverless Rides

Fair Value:US$11632.1% undervalued
13 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
3 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

RO
RockeTeller
KUYA logo
RockeTeller on Kuya Silver ·

Kuya Silver, The High-Octane Rocket With 15,372 g/t Silver + $12 AISC

Fair Value:CA$10.8493.3% undervalued
10 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
1 users have liked this narrative
RO
Robbo
ULVR logo
Robbo on Unilever ·

Unilever (LSE:ULVR), changes in the wind.

Fair Value:UK£42.2813.0% overvalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
TR
tripledub
DSK logo
tripledub on Dusk Group ·

Buying a Dollar for Fifty Cents: The Case for Dusk Group

Fair Value:AU$0.790.6% undervalued
24 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

OS
oscargarcia
NVDA logo
oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

Fair Value:US$28022.3% undervalued
363 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
CU
MSFT logo
CubanEros on Microsoft ·

A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Fair Value:US$419.9122.3% overvalued
212 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative
JO
John_Eric
Emerging Author
MELI logo
John_Eric on MercadoLibre ·

MercadoLibre and the Spreadsheet Trick That Decides Everything

Fair Value:US$7.31k73.1% undervalued
125 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
17 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion