Forte Biosciences, Inc.

NasdaqCM:FBRX Stock Report

Market Cap: US$444.1m

Forte Biosciences Past Earnings Performance

Past criteria checks 0/6

Forte Biosciences's earnings have been declining at an average annual rate of -23.5%, while the Biotechs industry saw earnings growing at 36.2% annually.

Key information

-23.51%

Earnings growth rate

45.02%

EPS growth rate

Biotechs Industry Growth17.04%
Revenue growth raten/a
Return on equity-180.18%
Net Marginn/a
Last Earnings Update31 Mar 2026

Recent past performance updates

No updates

Recent updates

Analysis Article Nov 11

We're Not Very Worried About Forte Biosciences' (NASDAQ:FBRX) Cash Burn Rate

We can readily understand why investors are attracted to unprofitable companies. For example, Forte Biosciences...
Analysis Article Apr 19

We Think Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) Needs To Drive Business Growth Carefully

We can readily understand why investors are attracted to unprofitable companies. For example, although Amazon.com made...
Analysis Article Jul 17

We're A Little Worried About Forte Biosciences' (NASDAQ:FBRX) Cash Burn Rate

There's no doubt that money can be made by owning shares of unprofitable businesses. For example, although Amazon.com...
Analysis Article Mar 14

Is Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) In A Good Position To Deliver On Growth Plans?

Just because a business does not make any money, does not mean that the stock will go down. For example, although...
Seeking Alpha Aug 24

Large Forte Biosciences shareholder scolds company board of directors

Funicular Funds, which owns 8% of the outstanding shares of Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX), excoriated the company's board of directors in a letter over a recent capital raise. In an SEC filing, Funicular said the letter addressed the "Board’s failure to address the legitimate concerns previously raised by stockholders and its decision to embark on a value-destructive, scorched-earth path with a dilutive and unnecessary capital raise, without so much as an explanation for its actions." Funicular is asking to establish a committee of independent directors to investigate shareholder concerns. In July, a pair of large shareholders demanded changes at Forte (FBRX), including a suggestion that the company liquidate.
Analysis Article Aug 17

We're Hopeful That Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) Will Use Its Cash Wisely

There's no doubt that money can be made by owning shares of unprofitable businesses. For example, biotech and mining...
Seeking Alpha Aug 16

Forte Biosciences: Lots Of Clinical Risk Ahead And A Questionable Business Plan

FB-401, the lead asset failed in clinical trials. The company has one very early-stage asset they intend to move forward in the clinic, FB-102. Investors are likely to encounter dilution, a high degree of clinical risk and there is insufficient evidence to assess whether FB-401 has any advantages over other therapeutics. Summary Creativity is not my strength so I am reusing the title from an article that I wrote a few months back about Vyne Therapeutics, another dermatology company. The shares of Vyne have fallen 60% since then. The story is at Forte is essentially the same and all too common in biotech. Vyne and Forte both experienced setbacks, institutional investors sold and long term investors have fared poorly. Most importantly, for both companies, there is a suboptimal plan to move forward that exposes investors to a high degree of clinical risk, requires hundreds of millions of capital and has a low chance of rewarding investors in a manner commensurate with this outsized risk. I will outline a few reasons I rate Forte Biosciences (FBRX) a SELL Institutional Investors Major institutional investors have sold and cut their losses. Forte Biosciences had an enviable roster of professional investors including BVF, Orbimed and Perceptive Advisors. These are seasoned investors with a staff of PhD/MDs who are highly capable of assessing the future likelihood of success. All three funds sold their entire stake in the company. This is not always the case after a clinical failure. There are many cases where institutional investors increase their stake at a low price. Three institutional investors selling their entire stake strongly suggests these professionals do not see a bright future. For an unprofitable biotech company, institutional investors are an important source of capital. Funding an unprofitable biotech in the capital markets is very challenging currently. It is not clear Forte will be able to obtain future funding and if they do, terms will likely be unfavorable. What is clear is they have very limited cash ($38.5 m currently) and they will need hundreds of million to develop the new molecule. In fact, they have a shelf registration in place. Investors should expect substantial dilution. The Plan Forward The asset the company intends to move forward after the failure of FB-401 in atopic dermatitis is FB-102. Given this asset is in the very early stages of testing, prudence dictates an assessment as to whether the risk is worth the potential reward. This molecule may enter the clinic for testing as late as 2024. The company's presentation noted development plans in graft versus host disease (GvHD), vitiligo and alopecia areata which represent combined markets of over $6 billion. Each indication will require separate clinical trials to prove safety and efficacy adding substantially to the cost of development. Each of these indications has standard of care treatments. The company notes an unmet medical need. GvHD is a disease where there is a legitimate unmet need but there are other companies much further along in testing including Seres Therapeutics (MCRB) and MaaT Pharma. The unmet need may be satisfied by these entrants and MaaT has already produced favorable safety and efficacy data. Alopecia and vitiligo have very effective treatments currently-JAK inhibitors. The company noted the safety profile of JAK inhibitors. Opzelura is a topical JAK and most Doctors consider the safety profile of the cream to be of no concern whatsoever. In alopecia, where oral JAKS are approved, the safety and efficacy data for all 3 JAK inhibitors (Pfizer, Lilly and Concert) has been favorable but there is a black box warning. From an efficacy standpoint, there is no unmet need. From a safety standpoint, the mechanism of action and side effect profile are related. The JAK inhibitors work in vitiligo and alopecia areata by suppressing the immune system. There is nothing to suggest FB-102 can achieve the suppression of the immune system required for efficacy without the same safety issues. Investors are going to spend hundreds of million dollars developing treatments in indications where there are either treatments approved or assets years ahead of Forte's molecule, FB-102. Investors are taking on a huge amount of risk to enter crowded markets with little assurance of any competitive advantage. Of course, there is also the possibility the molecule does not show efficacy or adequate safety and needs to abandoned leaving Forte with no assets. To make development of FB-102 worthwhile, it would have to offer a benefit over existing treatments. The company presentation does not include the mechanism of action of FB-102 making it impossible to ascertain whether the "proprietary molecule" that involves "antagonism of a pathway for autoimmune disease" has any advantages or is even likely to work. The company cites infrequent dosing as a potential benefit of the treatment. This is an extraordinarily poor reason to spend hundreds of millions to develop a treatment. Dosing is a very unimportant issue in diseases such as GvHD which can be fatal. Vitiligo and alopecia areata are diseases where patients have skin discolorations or baldness and patients are highly motivated to take their medicine.
Seeking Alpha Jul 07

Forte Biosciences large shareholders make demands for company's future

A pair of large shareholders of Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) are making demands that could impact the company's future, including the suggestion that the company liquidate. In a Wednesday SEC filing, Brad Leonard, managing member of BML Capital Management, which has a 9.1% stake in common shares, wrote that "Forte shareholders would be best served by a complete liquidation as soon as possible." Forte (FBRX) and some shareholders have been at odds over the future of Forte's only asset, FB-102, which is in the preclinical stage for several indications, including alopecia and vitiligo, a conditions that affects skin pigmentation. Leonard noted that since a May announcement on development plans, there has not been a single insider purchase. On Tuesday, Jacob Ma-Weaver, managing member of Funicular Funds, said in a SEC filing that Forte's board had yet to make an "adequate assessment of the potential immediate value creation that could be achieved through a substantial buyback program, tender offer at a premium, or special dividend." Funicular has a 7.5% stake. Seeking Alpha's Quant Rating views Forte (FBRX) as a hold with the only high grade being for valuation.
Analysis Article Dec 23

We Think Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) Needs To Drive Business Growth Carefully

There's no doubt that money can be made by owning shares of unprofitable businesses. For example, although Amazon.com...
Analysis Article Mar 13

Are Insiders Buying Forte Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:FBRX) Stock?

We often see insiders buying up shares in companies that perform well over the long term. The flip side of that is that...
Analysis Article Jan 19

Do Institutions Own Forte Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:FBRX) Shares?

A look at the shareholders of Forte Biosciences, Inc. ( NASDAQ:FBRX ) can tell us which group is most powerful...
Analysis Article Nov 25

Who Has Been Buying Forte Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:FBRX) Shares?

We've lost count of how many times insiders have accumulated shares in a company that goes on to improve markedly. The...

Revenue & Expenses Breakdown

How Forte Biosciences makes and spends money. Based on latest reported earnings, on an LTM basis.


Earnings and Revenue History

NasdaqCM:FBRX Revenue, expenses and earnings (USD Millions)
DateRevenueEarningsG+A ExpensesR&D Expenses
31 Mar 260-761166
31 Dec 250-691258
30 Sep 250-521242
30 Jun 250-421132
31 Mar 250-441530
31 Dec 240-351521
30 Sep 240-341620
30 Jun 240-361720
31 Mar 240-321221
31 Dec 230-311122
30 Sep 230-301021
30 Jun 230-24816
31 Mar 230-18910
31 Dec 220-1486
30 Sep 220-1284
30 Jun 220-1789
31 Mar 220-19811
31 Dec 210-22814
30 Sep 210-23716
30 Jun 210-20614
31 Mar 210-49512
31 Dec 200-46410
30 Sep 200-4338
30 Jun 200-3925
31 Mar 200-523
31 Dec 190-413

Quality Earnings: FBRX is currently unprofitable.

Growing Profit Margin: FBRX is currently unprofitable.


Free Cash Flow vs Earnings Analysis


Past Earnings Growth Analysis

Earnings Trend: FBRX is unprofitable, and losses have increased over the past 5 years at a rate of 23.5% per year.

Accelerating Growth: Unable to compare FBRX's earnings growth over the past year to its 5-year average as it is currently unprofitable

Earnings vs Industry: FBRX is unprofitable, making it difficult to compare its past year earnings growth to the Biotechs industry (54.5%).


Return on Equity

High ROE: FBRX has a negative Return on Equity (-180.18%), as it is currently unprofitable.


Return on Assets


Return on Capital Employed


Discover strong past performing companies

Company Analysis and Financial Data Status

DataLast Updated (UTC time)
Company Analysis2026/06/03 15:02
End of Day Share Price 2026/06/03 00:00
Earnings2026/03/31
Annual Earnings2025/12/31

Data Sources

The data used in our company analysis is from S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC. The following data is used in our analysis model to generate this report. Data is normalised which can introduce a delay from the source being available.

PackageDataTimeframeExample US Source *
Company Financials10 years
  • Income statement
  • Cash flow statement
  • Balance sheet
Analyst Consensus Estimates+3 years
  • Forecast financials
  • Analyst price targets
Market Prices30 years
  • Stock prices
  • Dividends, Splits and Actions
Ownership10 years
  • Top shareholders
  • Insider trading
Management10 years
  • Leadership team
  • Board of directors
Key Developments10 years
  • Company announcements

* Example for US securities, for non-US equivalent regulatory forms and sources are used.

Unless specified all financial data is based on a yearly period but updated quarterly. This is known as Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) or Last Twelve Month (LTM) Data. Learn more.

Analysis Model and Snowflake

Details of the analysis model used to generate this report is available on our Github page, we also have guides on how to use our reports and tutorials on Youtube.

Learn about the world class team who designed and built the Simply Wall St analysis model.

Industry and Sector Metrics

Our industry and section metrics are calculated every 6 hours by Simply Wall St, details of our process are available on Github.

Analyst Sources

Forte Biosciences, Inc. is covered by 9 analysts. 4 of those analysts submitted the estimates of revenue or earnings used as inputs to our report. Analysts submissions are updated throughout the day.

AnalystInstitution
Kalpit PatelB. Riley Securities, Inc.
Kumaraguru RajaBrookline Capital Markets
Keay NakaeChardan Capital Markets, LLC