Forte Biosciences, Inc.

NasdaqCM:FBRX Stock Report

Market Cap: US$425.2m

Forte Biosciences Management

Management criteria checks 2/4

Forte Biosciences' CEO is Paul A. Wagner, appointed in Jan 2018, has a tenure of 8.42 years. total yearly compensation is $7.36M, comprised of 9.1% salary and 90.9% bonuses, including company stock and options. directly owns 0.35% of the company’s shares, worth $1.47M. The average tenure of the management team and the board of directors is 5.2 years and 3.8 years respectively.

Key information

Paul A. Wagner

Chief executive officer

US$7.4m

Total compensation

CEO salary percentage9.11%
CEO tenure8.4yrs
CEO ownership0.3%
Management average tenure5.2yrs
Board average tenure3.8yrs

Recent management updates

Recent updates

Analysis Article Nov 11

We're Not Very Worried About Forte Biosciences' (NASDAQ:FBRX) Cash Burn Rate

We can readily understand why investors are attracted to unprofitable companies. For example, Forte Biosciences...
Analysis Article Apr 19

We Think Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) Needs To Drive Business Growth Carefully

We can readily understand why investors are attracted to unprofitable companies. For example, although Amazon.com made...
Analysis Article Jul 17

We're A Little Worried About Forte Biosciences' (NASDAQ:FBRX) Cash Burn Rate

There's no doubt that money can be made by owning shares of unprofitable businesses. For example, although Amazon.com...
Analysis Article Mar 14

Is Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) In A Good Position To Deliver On Growth Plans?

Just because a business does not make any money, does not mean that the stock will go down. For example, although...
Seeking Alpha Aug 24

Large Forte Biosciences shareholder scolds company board of directors

Funicular Funds, which owns 8% of the outstanding shares of Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX), excoriated the company's board of directors in a letter over a recent capital raise. In an SEC filing, Funicular said the letter addressed the "Board’s failure to address the legitimate concerns previously raised by stockholders and its decision to embark on a value-destructive, scorched-earth path with a dilutive and unnecessary capital raise, without so much as an explanation for its actions." Funicular is asking to establish a committee of independent directors to investigate shareholder concerns. In July, a pair of large shareholders demanded changes at Forte (FBRX), including a suggestion that the company liquidate.
Analysis Article Aug 17

We're Hopeful That Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) Will Use Its Cash Wisely

There's no doubt that money can be made by owning shares of unprofitable businesses. For example, biotech and mining...
Seeking Alpha Aug 16

Forte Biosciences: Lots Of Clinical Risk Ahead And A Questionable Business Plan

FB-401, the lead asset failed in clinical trials. The company has one very early-stage asset they intend to move forward in the clinic, FB-102. Investors are likely to encounter dilution, a high degree of clinical risk and there is insufficient evidence to assess whether FB-401 has any advantages over other therapeutics. Summary Creativity is not my strength so I am reusing the title from an article that I wrote a few months back about Vyne Therapeutics, another dermatology company. The shares of Vyne have fallen 60% since then. The story is at Forte is essentially the same and all too common in biotech. Vyne and Forte both experienced setbacks, institutional investors sold and long term investors have fared poorly. Most importantly, for both companies, there is a suboptimal plan to move forward that exposes investors to a high degree of clinical risk, requires hundreds of millions of capital and has a low chance of rewarding investors in a manner commensurate with this outsized risk. I will outline a few reasons I rate Forte Biosciences (FBRX) a SELL Institutional Investors Major institutional investors have sold and cut their losses. Forte Biosciences had an enviable roster of professional investors including BVF, Orbimed and Perceptive Advisors. These are seasoned investors with a staff of PhD/MDs who are highly capable of assessing the future likelihood of success. All three funds sold their entire stake in the company. This is not always the case after a clinical failure. There are many cases where institutional investors increase their stake at a low price. Three institutional investors selling their entire stake strongly suggests these professionals do not see a bright future. For an unprofitable biotech company, institutional investors are an important source of capital. Funding an unprofitable biotech in the capital markets is very challenging currently. It is not clear Forte will be able to obtain future funding and if they do, terms will likely be unfavorable. What is clear is they have very limited cash ($38.5 m currently) and they will need hundreds of million to develop the new molecule. In fact, they have a shelf registration in place. Investors should expect substantial dilution. The Plan Forward The asset the company intends to move forward after the failure of FB-401 in atopic dermatitis is FB-102. Given this asset is in the very early stages of testing, prudence dictates an assessment as to whether the risk is worth the potential reward. This molecule may enter the clinic for testing as late as 2024. The company's presentation noted development plans in graft versus host disease (GvHD), vitiligo and alopecia areata which represent combined markets of over $6 billion. Each indication will require separate clinical trials to prove safety and efficacy adding substantially to the cost of development. Each of these indications has standard of care treatments. The company notes an unmet medical need. GvHD is a disease where there is a legitimate unmet need but there are other companies much further along in testing including Seres Therapeutics (MCRB) and MaaT Pharma. The unmet need may be satisfied by these entrants and MaaT has already produced favorable safety and efficacy data. Alopecia and vitiligo have very effective treatments currently-JAK inhibitors. The company noted the safety profile of JAK inhibitors. Opzelura is a topical JAK and most Doctors consider the safety profile of the cream to be of no concern whatsoever. In alopecia, where oral JAKS are approved, the safety and efficacy data for all 3 JAK inhibitors (Pfizer, Lilly and Concert) has been favorable but there is a black box warning. From an efficacy standpoint, there is no unmet need. From a safety standpoint, the mechanism of action and side effect profile are related. The JAK inhibitors work in vitiligo and alopecia areata by suppressing the immune system. There is nothing to suggest FB-102 can achieve the suppression of the immune system required for efficacy without the same safety issues. Investors are going to spend hundreds of million dollars developing treatments in indications where there are either treatments approved or assets years ahead of Forte's molecule, FB-102. Investors are taking on a huge amount of risk to enter crowded markets with little assurance of any competitive advantage. Of course, there is also the possibility the molecule does not show efficacy or adequate safety and needs to abandoned leaving Forte with no assets. To make development of FB-102 worthwhile, it would have to offer a benefit over existing treatments. The company presentation does not include the mechanism of action of FB-102 making it impossible to ascertain whether the "proprietary molecule" that involves "antagonism of a pathway for autoimmune disease" has any advantages or is even likely to work. The company cites infrequent dosing as a potential benefit of the treatment. This is an extraordinarily poor reason to spend hundreds of millions to develop a treatment. Dosing is a very unimportant issue in diseases such as GvHD which can be fatal. Vitiligo and alopecia areata are diseases where patients have skin discolorations or baldness and patients are highly motivated to take their medicine.
Seeking Alpha Jul 07

Forte Biosciences large shareholders make demands for company's future

A pair of large shareholders of Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) are making demands that could impact the company's future, including the suggestion that the company liquidate. In a Wednesday SEC filing, Brad Leonard, managing member of BML Capital Management, which has a 9.1% stake in common shares, wrote that "Forte shareholders would be best served by a complete liquidation as soon as possible." Forte (FBRX) and some shareholders have been at odds over the future of Forte's only asset, FB-102, which is in the preclinical stage for several indications, including alopecia and vitiligo, a conditions that affects skin pigmentation. Leonard noted that since a May announcement on development plans, there has not been a single insider purchase. On Tuesday, Jacob Ma-Weaver, managing member of Funicular Funds, said in a SEC filing that Forte's board had yet to make an "adequate assessment of the potential immediate value creation that could be achieved through a substantial buyback program, tender offer at a premium, or special dividend." Funicular has a 7.5% stake. Seeking Alpha's Quant Rating views Forte (FBRX) as a hold with the only high grade being for valuation.
Analysis Article Dec 23

We Think Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) Needs To Drive Business Growth Carefully

There's no doubt that money can be made by owning shares of unprofitable businesses. For example, although Amazon.com...
Analysis Article Mar 13

Are Insiders Buying Forte Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:FBRX) Stock?

We often see insiders buying up shares in companies that perform well over the long term. The flip side of that is that...
Analysis Article Jan 19

Do Institutions Own Forte Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:FBRX) Shares?

A look at the shareholders of Forte Biosciences, Inc. ( NASDAQ:FBRX ) can tell us which group is most powerful...
Analysis Article Nov 25

Who Has Been Buying Forte Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:FBRX) Shares?

We've lost count of how many times insiders have accumulated shares in a company that goes on to improve markedly. The...

CEO Compensation Analysis

How has Paul A. Wagner's remuneration changed compared to Forte Biosciences's earnings?
DateTotal CompensationSalaryCompany Earnings
Mar 31 2026n/an/a

-US$76m

Dec 31 2025US$7mUS$670k

-US$69m

Sep 30 2025n/an/a

-US$52m

Jun 30 2025n/an/a

-US$42m

Mar 31 2025n/an/a

-US$44m

Dec 31 2024US$2mUS$644k

-US$35m

Sep 30 2024n/an/a

-US$34m

Jun 30 2024n/an/a

-US$36m

Mar 31 2024n/an/a

-US$32m

Dec 31 2023US$1mUS$620k

-US$31m

Sep 30 2023n/an/a

-US$30m

Jun 30 2023n/an/a

-US$24m

Mar 31 2023n/an/a

-US$18m

Dec 31 2022US$1mUS$590k

-US$14m

Sep 30 2022n/an/a

-US$12m

Jun 30 2022n/an/a

-US$17m

Mar 31 2022n/an/a

-US$19m

Dec 31 2021US$5mUS$590k

-US$22m

Sep 30 2021n/an/a

-US$23m

Jun 30 2021n/an/a

-US$20m

Mar 31 2021n/an/a

-US$49m

Dec 31 2020US$777kUS$453k

-US$46m

Sep 30 2020n/an/a

-US$43m

Jun 30 2020n/an/a

-US$39m

Mar 31 2020n/an/a

-US$5m

Dec 31 2019US$525kUS$350k

-US$4m

Compensation vs Market: Paul A.'s total compensation ($USD7.36M) is above average for companies of similar size in the US market ($USD2.59M).

Compensation vs Earnings: Paul A.'s compensation has increased whilst the company is unprofitable.


CEO

Paul A. Wagner (56 yo)

8.4yrs
Tenure
US$7,358,587
Compensation

Dr. Paul A. Wagner, CFA, Ph.D. has been the Senior Vice President of Corporate Strategy & Development and Chief Business Officer at CANbridge Life Sciences Ltd. since October 16, 2017. Dr. Wagner leads CAN...


Leadership Team

NamePositionTenureCompensationOwnership
Paul A. Wagner
CEO, President & Chairman8.4yrsUS$7.36m0.35%
$ 1.5m
Antony Riley
Chief Financial Officer6.3yrsUS$2.72m0.17%
$ 730.5k
Barbara Finck
Acting Senior Medical Clinician & Director2.3yrsUS$786.72k0%
$ 0
Christopher Roenfeldt
Chief Operating Officer4.1yrsno datano data
5.2yrs
Average Tenure
59yo
Average Age

Experienced Management: FBRX's management team is seasoned and experienced (5.2 years average tenure).


Board Members

NamePositionTenureCompensationOwnership
Paul A. Wagner
CEO, President & Chairman9.4yrsUS$7.36m0.35%
$ 1.5m
Barbara Finck
Acting Senior Medical Clinician & Director4.3yrsUS$786.72k0%
$ 0
David Gryska
Independent Director3.4yrsUS$252.61k0.024%
$ 103.4k
Richard Vincent
Independent Director1.8yrsUS$271.74k0%
$ 0
Lawrence F. Eichenfield
Chair of Scientific Advisory Boardno dataUS$95.84kno data
Patricia Walker
Member of Scientific Advisory Boardno dataUS$50.80kno data
Stephen Doberstein
Member of Scientific Advisory Board & Independent Director4.1yrsUS$250.02k0%
$ 0
Steven Kornfeld
Independent Director6yrsUS$288.15k0.016%
$ 68.9k
Shivpreet Kapoor
Independent Director1.8yrsUS$248.04k0%
$ 0
Scott Brun
Independent Director3.6yrsUS$255.02k0%
$ 0
Eric Simpson
Member of Scientific Advisory Boardno datano datano data
3.8yrs
Average Tenure
64.5yo
Average Age

Experienced Board: FBRX's board of directors are considered experienced (3.8 years average tenure).


Company Analysis and Financial Data Status

DataLast Updated (UTC time)
Company Analysis2026/06/12 22:05
End of Day Share Price 2026/06/12 00:00
Earnings2026/03/31
Annual Earnings2025/12/31

Data Sources

The data used in our company analysis is from S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC. The following data is used in our analysis model to generate this report. Data is normalised which can introduce a delay from the source being available.

PackageDataTimeframeExample US Source *
Company Financials10 years
  • Income statement
  • Cash flow statement
  • Balance sheet
Analyst Consensus Estimates+3 years
  • Forecast financials
  • Analyst price targets
Market Prices30 years
  • Stock prices
  • Dividends, Splits and Actions
Ownership10 years
  • Top shareholders
  • Insider trading
Management10 years
  • Leadership team
  • Board of directors
Key Developments10 years
  • Company announcements

* Example for US securities, for non-US equivalent regulatory forms and sources are used.

Unless specified all financial data is based on a yearly period but updated quarterly. This is known as Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) or Last Twelve Month (LTM) Data. Learn more.

Analysis Model and Snowflake

Details of the analysis model used to generate this report is available on our Github page, we also have guides on how to use our reports and tutorials on Youtube.

Learn about the world class team who designed and built the Simply Wall St analysis model.

Industry and Sector Metrics

Our industry and section metrics are calculated every 6 hours by Simply Wall St, details of our process are available on Github.

Analyst Sources

Forte Biosciences, Inc. is covered by 9 analysts. 4 of those analysts submitted the estimates of revenue or earnings used as inputs to our report. Analysts submissions are updated throughout the day.

AnalystInstitution
Kalpit PatelB. Riley Securities, Inc.
Kumaraguru RajaBrookline Capital Markets
Keay NakaeChardan Capital Markets, LLC