CEQP Stock Overview
Crestwood Equity Partners LP develops, acquires, owns, controls, and operates assets and operations in the energy midstream sector in the United States.
| Snowflake Score | |
|---|---|
| Valuation | 2/6 |
| Future Growth | 3/6 |
| Past Performance | 3/6 |
| Financial Health | 1/6 |
| Dividends | 3/6 |
Crestwood Equity Partners LP Competitors
Price History & Performance
| Historical stock prices | |
|---|---|
| Current Share Price | US$28.26 |
| 52 Week High | US$30.16 |
| 52 Week Low | US$22.11 |
| Beta | 2.41 |
| 1 Month Change | -0.74% |
| 3 Month Change | 5.84% |
| 1 Year Change | -3.75% |
| 3 Year Change | 111.37% |
| 5 Year Change | -14.96% |
| Change since IPO | -80.78% |
Recent News & Updates
Recent updates
Crestwood Equity Partners: Strong Value Potential As Acquisition Deal Is Finalizing
Sep 29Crestwood Equity To Become Part Of Energy Transfer Empire
Aug 17Crestwood: Marginally Weaker Quarter But Unchanged Thesis
Aug 01Crestwood Equity Partners: 10.2% Yield, 1.7x DCF Coverage, Low Valuation
Jun 07Crestwood Equity: Dealmaking Has Transformed The Company
Feb 17Crestwood Equity goes ex dividend monday
Feb 03Crestwood Equity: 9.5% Yield, Strong Distribution Coverage, Cheap Valuation
Jan 14Crestwood Equity Q3 2022 Earnings Preview
Nov 01Crestwood Equity declares $0.655 dividend
Oct 25Crestwood Equity Partners: The Numbers Are Not Stacking Up
Sep 27Crestwood announces common units secondary offering & concurrent common unit repurchase
Sep 12Crestwood Equity Q2 2022 Earnings Preview
Jul 25Crestwood Equity declares $0.655 dividend
Jul 14The Crestwood-Oasis Midstream Merger Is Interesting
Nov 30Crestwood: 8.7% Yield And 30% Upside With Accretive Acquisition Of Oasis Midstream
Oct 26Crestwood: Now Best In Class On Many Metrics
Jul 28Crestwood Equity Partners: Higher Distributions Could Follow Their Stagecoach Divestiture
Jul 15Crestwood: Selling Stagecoach At Expected Price
Jun 01Crestwood Equity Q1 2021 Earnings Preview
Apr 26Shareholder Returns
| CEQP | US Oil and Gas | US Market | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7D | 3.5% | 3.1% | 1.0% |
| 1Y | -3.7% | 16.0% | 21.9% |
Return vs Industry: CEQP matched the US Oil and Gas industry which returned -3.2% over the past year.
Return vs Market: CEQP underperformed the US Market which returned 14.1% over the past year.
Price Volatility
| CEQP volatility | |
|---|---|
| CEQP Average Weekly Movement | 3.2% |
| Oil and Gas Industry Average Movement | 4.5% |
| Market Average Movement | 6.0% |
| 10% most volatile stocks in US Market | 16.8% |
| 10% least volatile stocks in US Market | 3.0% |
Stable Share Price: CEQP has not had significant price volatility in the past 3 months.
Volatility Over Time: CEQP's weekly volatility (3%) has been stable over the past year.
About the Company
| Founded | Employees | CEO | Website |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 753 | Bob Phillips | www.crestwoodlp.com |
Crestwood Equity Partners LP develops, acquires, owns, controls, and operates assets and operations in the energy midstream sector in the United States. The company operates through three segments: Gathering and Processing North; Gathering and Processing South; and Storage and Logistics. The Gathering and Processing North segment offers natural gas, crude oil, and produced water gathering, compression, treating, processing, and disposal services to producers in the Williston Basin and Powder River Basin.
Crestwood Equity Partners LP Fundamentals Summary
| CEQP fundamental statistics | |
|---|---|
| Market cap | US$2.97b |
| Earnings (TTM) | US$136.30m |
| Revenue (TTM) | US$4.83b |
21.8x
P/E Ratio0.6x
P/S RatioIs CEQP overvalued?
See Fair Value and valuation analysisEarnings & Revenue
| CEQP income statement (TTM) | |
|---|---|
| Revenue | US$4.83b |
| Cost of Revenue | US$3.82b |
| Gross Profit | US$1.01b |
| Other Expenses | US$874.00m |
| Earnings | US$136.30m |
Last Reported Earnings
Sep 30, 2023
Next Earnings Date
n/a
| Earnings per share (EPS) | 1.30 |
| Gross Margin | 20.93% |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.82% |
| Debt/Equity Ratio | 145.3% |
How did CEQP perform over the long term?
See historical performance and comparison