Stock Analysis

Does Enlight (TWSE:2438) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

TWSE:2438
Source: Shutterstock

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that Enlight Corporation (TWSE:2438) does use debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

When Is Debt A Problem?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

See our latest analysis for Enlight

What Is Enlight's Debt?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of March 2024 Enlight had NT$610.0m of debt, an increase on none, over one year. However, it also had NT$183.1m in cash, and so its net debt is NT$426.9m.

debt-equity-history-analysis
TWSE:2438 Debt to Equity History July 13th 2024

A Look At Enlight's Liabilities

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Enlight had liabilities of NT$376.1m falling due within a year, and liabilities of NT$369.1m due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of NT$183.1m and NT$163.0m worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling NT$399.2m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

Since publicly traded Enlight shares are worth a total of NT$4.60b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since Enlight will need earnings to service that debt. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.

In the last year Enlight had a loss before interest and tax, and actually shrunk its revenue by 9.9%, to NT$154m. That's not what we would hope to see.

Caveat Emptor

Over the last twelve months Enlight produced an earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) loss. Indeed, it lost NT$101m at the EBIT level. Considering that alongside the liabilities mentioned above does not give us much confidence that company should be using so much debt. Quite frankly we think the balance sheet is far from match-fit, although it could be improved with time. Another cause for caution is that is bled NT$157m in negative free cash flow over the last twelve months. So suffice it to say we do consider the stock to be risky. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Enlight (2 are a bit unpleasant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.

Discover if Enlight might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.

Access Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.