Is Techstep (OB:TECH) A Risky Investment?

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We note that Techstep ASA (OB:TECH) does have debt on its balance sheet. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

Advertisement

When Is Debt A Problem?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

Check out our latest analysis for Techstep

What Is Techstep's Debt?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at March 2021 Techstep had debt of kr174.7m, up from kr47.5m in one year. However, it also had kr62.8m in cash, and so its net debt is kr111.9m.

debt-equity-history-analysis
OB:TECH Debt to Equity History May 12th 2021

How Healthy Is Techstep's Balance Sheet?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Techstep had liabilities of kr488.6m falling due within a year, and liabilities of kr169.0m due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had kr62.8m in cash and kr179.0m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total kr415.7m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

This deficit isn't so bad because Techstep is worth kr872.7m, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since Techstep will need earnings to service that debt. So when considering debt, it's definitely worth looking at the earnings trend. Click here for an interactive snapshot.

In the last year Techstep's revenue was pretty flat, and it made a negative EBIT. While that's not too bad, we'd prefer see growth.

Caveat Emptor

Over the last twelve months Techstep produced an earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) loss. Indeed, it lost kr38m at the EBIT level. When we look at that and recall the liabilities on its balance sheet, relative to cash, it seems unwise to us for the company to have any debt. So we think its balance sheet is a little strained, though not beyond repair. However, it doesn't help that it burned through kr22m of cash over the last year. So to be blunt we think it is risky. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Techstep that you should be aware of before investing here.

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

If you’re looking to trade Techstep, open an account with the lowest-cost* platform trusted by professionals, Interactive Brokers. Their clients from over 200 countries and territories trade stocks, options, futures, forex, bonds and funds worldwide from a single integrated account. Promoted


Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.

Discover if Techstep might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.

Access Free Analysis

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
*Interactive Brokers Rated Lowest Cost Broker by StockBrokers.com Annual Online Review 2020


Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

About OB:TECH

Techstep

Operates as a mobile technology company in Norway, Sweden, Denmark, and Poland.

Slightly overvalued with imperfect balance sheet.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

DA
davidlsander
UBI logo
davidlsander on Ubisoft Entertainment ·

Is Ubisoft the Market’s Biggest Pricing Error? Why Forensic Value Points to €33 Per Share

Fair Value:€33.887.9% undervalued
22 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
15 users have liked this narrative
TO
Tokyo
MC logo
Tokyo on LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton Société Européenne ·

EU#4 - Turning Heritage into the World’s Strongest Luxury Empire

Fair Value:€750.0429.5% undervalued
3 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative
WE
WealthAP
GOOGL logo
WealthAP on Alphabet ·

The "Easy Money" Is Gone: Why Alphabet Is Now a "Show Me" Story

Fair Value:US$386.4312.1% undervalued
57 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
15 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

FH
SOF logo
fhuyge on Sofina Société Anonyme ·

Why I invest in Sofina (Dividend growth)

Fair Value:€332.3828.6% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
ID
VNOM logo
Idle on Viper Energy ·

Great dividend but share numbers have increased 100% in last 12 months!!

Fair Value:US$32.9926.9% overvalued
10 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
RE
PROX logo
RecMag on Proximus ·

Proximus: The State-Backed Backup Plan with 7% Gross Yield and 15% Currency Upside.

Fair Value:€17.1354.8% undervalued
38 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

WE
WealthAP
PYPL logo
WealthAP on PayPal Holdings ·

The "Sleeping Giant" Stumbles, Then Wakes Up

Fair Value:US$8249.1% undervalued
85 users have followed this narrative
6 users have commented on this narrative
35 users have liked this narrative
OO
NEO logo
OOO97 on Neo Performance Materials ·

Undervalued Key Player in Magnets/Rare Earth

Fair Value:CA$25.3320.9% undervalued
75 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
19 users have liked this narrative
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget
NVDA logo
AnalystConsensusTarget on NVIDIA ·

NVDA: Expanding AI Demand Will Drive Major Data Center Investments Through 2026

Fair Value:US$253.0228.7% undervalued
1050 users have followed this narrative
6 users have commented on this narrative
31 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

HE
Hemingway
AEVA logo
Hemingway on Aeva Technologies ·

NVDA+AEVA Agreement is a game changer for the AEVA stock even though it is just a partnership and does not have a roll out until 2028 (which means receivables as early as 2027, I would imagine) This agreement effectively moves the goal posts of profitability for AEVA much closer since this is in addition to the recent Forterra agreement, as well as the (previously announced) European carmaker agreement (which is believed to be Mercedes-Benz and estimated to be worth at least 1 billion in sales alone) Underneath all of this, AEVA has a pre-existing agreement with Daimler Truck. So business seems to be booming, especially with really big name brands…which tends to bring in even more brand names (and thus more agreements/contracts/announcements, etc). This dynamic often creates more coverage from analysts (often with upside stock initial coverage) that I believe will be occurring over the next 3 to 6 months (as professional traders/analysts often research for 2 to 3 months before initiating coverage of a new issue). I also feel that the above momentum increases the likelihood that companies that do not currently utilize 4G LIDAR technology might consider buying AEVA outright. Realistically, even with a substantial premium to the current stock price, the cost of AEVA would be a rounding error for the likes of a company such as Tesla, and certainly would allow them to maintain their technological edge as the competition for self-driving vehicles continues to heat up. However, I think it is equally possible for NVidea to decide to lock-in the AEVA technology for their upcoming autonomous hardware/software package by buying them outright. Obviously, the above factors and recent activity in the AEVA stock are cause for optimism. Of course, this all just one opinion , so please do your own due diligence. Disclaimer: I/We DO trade in this stock from time to time and I/we may (or may not have) a position currently, so again, please do your own due diligence.

0
|
0
Advertisement