Stock Analysis

E.A. Technique (M) Berhad (KLSE:EATECH) Has No Shortage Of Debt

KLSE:EATECH
Source: Shutterstock

Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. As with many other companies E.A. Technique (M) Berhad (KLSE:EATECH) makes use of debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

When Is Debt A Problem?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

Check out our latest analysis for E.A. Technique (M) Berhad

How Much Debt Does E.A. Technique (M) Berhad Carry?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that E.A. Technique (M) Berhad had RM162.8m of debt in March 2023, down from RM280.8m, one year before. However, it also had RM15.4m in cash, and so its net debt is RM147.4m.

debt-equity-history-analysis
KLSE:EATECH Debt to Equity History August 21st 2023

How Strong Is E.A. Technique (M) Berhad's Balance Sheet?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that E.A. Technique (M) Berhad had liabilities of RM360.8m falling due within a year, and liabilities of RM113.7m due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of RM15.4m and RM37.0m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by RM422.1m.

This deficit casts a shadow over the RM130.0m company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we definitely think shareholders need to watch this one closely. After all, E.A. Technique (M) Berhad would likely require a major re-capitalisation if it had to pay its creditors today.

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

E.A. Technique (M) Berhad has net debt worth 2.3 times EBITDA, which isn't too much, but its interest cover looks a bit on the low side, with EBIT at only 2.7 times the interest expense. In large part that's due to the company's significant depreciation and amortisation charges, which arguably mean its EBITDA is a very generous measure of earnings, and its debt may be more of a burden than it first appears. We also note that E.A. Technique (M) Berhad improved its EBIT from a last year's loss to a positive RM25m. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is E.A. Technique (M) Berhad's earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So when considering debt, it's definitely worth looking at the earnings trend. Click here for an interactive snapshot.

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of the earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) is backed by free cash flow. Over the last year, E.A. Technique (M) Berhad saw substantial negative free cash flow, in total. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.

Our View

To be frank both E.A. Technique (M) Berhad's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow and its track record of staying on top of its total liabilities make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. But at least its EBIT growth rate is not so bad. After considering the datapoints discussed, we think E.A. Technique (M) Berhad has too much debt. While some investors love that sort of risky play, it's certainly not our cup of tea. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for E.A. Technique (M) Berhad you should be aware of, and 3 of them make us uncomfortable.

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.

Discover if E.A. Technique (M) Berhad might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.

Access Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.