- South Korea
- /
- Electronic Equipment and Components
- /
- KOSDAQ:A059100
i-Components' (KOSDAQ:059100) Solid Earnings Are Supported By Other Strong Factors
i-Components Co., Ltd (KOSDAQ:059100) just reported healthy earnings but the stock price didn't move much. We think that investors have missed some encouraging factors underlying the profit figures.
Our free stock report includes 2 warning signs investors should be aware of before investing in i-Components. Read for free now.Zooming In On i-Components' Earnings
One key financial ratio used to measure how well a company converts its profit to free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio. In plain english, this ratio subtracts FCF from net profit, and divides that number by the company's average operating assets over that period. The ratio shows us how much a company's profit exceeds its FCF.
As a result, a negative accrual ratio is a positive for the company, and a positive accrual ratio is a negative. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.
i-Components has an accrual ratio of -0.10 for the year to March 2025. That implies it has good cash conversion, and implies that its free cash flow solidly exceeded its profit last year. Indeed, in the last twelve months it reported free cash flow of ₩8.0b, well over the ₩3.89b it reported in profit. i-Components' free cash flow improved over the last year, which is generally good to see.
Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of i-Components.
Our Take On i-Components' Profit Performance
As we discussed above, i-Components has perfectly satisfactory free cash flow relative to profit. Because of this, we think i-Components' earnings potential is at least as good as it seems, and maybe even better! And it's also positive that the company showed enough improvement to book a profit this year, after losing money last year. The goal of this article has been to assess how well we can rely on the statutory earnings to reflect the company's potential, but there is plenty more to consider. With this in mind, we wouldn't consider investing in a stock unless we had a thorough understanding of the risks. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for i-Components you should be mindful of and 1 of these doesn't sit too well with us.
Today we've zoomed in on a single data point to better understand the nature of i-Components' profit. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.
Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.
Discover if i-Components might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.
Access Free AnalysisHave feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
About KOSDAQ:A059100
i-Components
Produces and sells barrier and optical plastic films, and substrates in South Korea.
Flawless balance sheet with solid track record.
Market Insights
Weekly Picks

When GPS fails: this small cap is fixing a $54B drone problem

Why Amdocs is a high conviction Buy for me?
Why SBM Offshore’s €30 Share Price May Be Too Harsh On Its Backlog

One of China's Fastest-Growing Restaurant Chains Trades on Just 7x Earnings and an 8% Dividend
Recently Updated Narratives
The Reinsurance Transition Is Doing The Growth
Negative Free Cash Flow For The First Time In A Second Quarter
Earnings Grew 22%, Not 31%, And The Difference Is OpenAI Accounting
Popular Narratives

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.
A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Warren Buffett Just Bet $10 Billion on Google. The Catch? You May Already Be Too Late.
Trending Discussion
As someone who has dealt directly with them as a CTO for a credit union, I have 8 years of horror stories about doing business with them. If there was any other competitor than could deliver 80% of Fiserv services, there would be a mad rush to migrate to them. They should thank their lucky stars they are a near monopoly. this industry is so ripe for a well funded competitor. Their integration of technology is awful, their ability to fix their own implementation screwups is sadly tragic. Sometimes they just silently kill support tickets without resolution and you never find out until you do a follow up inquiry. Why, because sometimes no one you are dealing with knows how to fix it and knows no one to ask for help. They can not meet their own implementation deadlines and sometimes there is no one on a technical team dealing with you that has any banking or credit union experience. The is an industry insider phrase when you meet other Fiserv customers called being "Fiserved". It means telling others of your worst stories of dealing with them. Ask around, all CTO's have some doozies.


