- South Korea
- /
- Software
- /
- KOSDAQ:A263800
Is Datasolution (KOSDAQ:263800) Using Debt Sensibly?
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. Importantly, Datasolution, Inc. (KOSDAQ:263800) does carry debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
When Is Debt Dangerous?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
View our latest analysis for Datasolution
What Is Datasolution's Net Debt?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Datasolution had debt of ₩2.40b at the end of June 2024, a reduction from ₩4.24b over a year. But it also has ₩7.67b in cash to offset that, meaning it has ₩5.27b net cash.
How Healthy Is Datasolution's Balance Sheet?
According to the last reported balance sheet, Datasolution had liabilities of ₩26.6b due within 12 months, and liabilities of ₩2.66b due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of ₩7.67b and ₩3.44b worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling ₩18.1b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
This deficit isn't so bad because Datasolution is worth ₩78.5b, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt. While it does have liabilities worth noting, Datasolution also has more cash than debt, so we're pretty confident it can manage its debt safely. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since Datasolution will need earnings to service that debt. So when considering debt, it's definitely worth looking at the earnings trend. Click here for an interactive snapshot.
Over 12 months, Datasolution made a loss at the EBIT level, and saw its revenue drop to ₩91b, which is a fall of 6.2%. We would much prefer see growth.
So How Risky Is Datasolution?
We have no doubt that loss making companies are, in general, riskier than profitable ones. And in the last year Datasolution had an earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) loss, truth be told. Indeed, in that time it burnt through ₩18b of cash and made a loss of ₩9.5m. With only ₩5.27b on the balance sheet, it would appear that its going to need to raise capital again soon. Summing up, we're a little skeptical of this one, as it seems fairly risky in the absence of free cashflow. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Datasolution you should be aware of.
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One Place
We've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.
• Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency
• Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile
• Track the Fair Value of your stocks
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
About KOSDAQ:A263800
Datasolution
Provides data solutions in South Korea.
Excellent balance sheet and good value.
Market Insights
Weekly Picks

Looking to be second time lucky with a game-changing new product
PlaySide Studios: Market Is Sleeping on a Potential 10M+ Unit Breakout Year, FY26 Could Be the Rerate of the Decade

Inotiv NAMs Test Center
This isn’t speculation — this is confirmation.A Schedule 13G was filed, not a 13D, meaning this is passive institutional capital, not acti
Recently Updated Narratives
From $5M to $2B: Why the 2024 Crash Was the Best Buying Opportunity in Consumer Stocks

EU#7 - From Aprons in Galicia to the World’s Most Efficient Fashion Machine
ASTS is a high upside/high execution risk stock.
Popular Narratives

Is Ubisoft the Market’s Biggest Pricing Error? Why Forensic Value Points to €33 Per Share

Analyst Commentary Highlights Microsoft AI Momentum and Upward Valuation Amid Growth and Competitive Risks

The "Physical AI" Monopoly – A New Industrial Revolution
Trending Discussion
Looks interesting, I am jumping into the finances now. Your 15% margin seems high for a conservative model, can't just ignore the years they need to invest. You didnt seem to mention that they had to dilute the sharebase by issuing ~40mil shares. raising ~8 mil. should be enough if mouse does OK. If not they will need to raise more to suvive. Losing 20m a year, 14m after there 6m cutbacks. Am I reading it right that they have no debt. have they any history of raising debt? First look it is too dependant on the mouse and GoT games. they do well stock will 2-3x, poorly and it will drop. I am not sure I agree with your work for hire backstop. Unlikely meta horizons will continue with the same size contract going forward. say 10% margins and 15x multiple on 30m. that is 45m, which with the new sharecount is 10c. It is a backstop but maybe not that strong. Mouse fails and devs could start jumping ship and outside contracts could dry up. Hmm on top of all that AI could be disrupting the work for hire model. I think I have mostly talked myself out of it. Although Mouse looks good and does seem like the type of game that could go viral on twitch for a few months. If it does you will likly get a great return 5x plus. crap maybe I am talking myself back in.
