Stock Analysis

LX Semicon Co., Ltd.'s (KRX:108320) Earnings Are Not Doing Enough For Some Investors

KOSE:A108320
Source: Shutterstock

With a price-to-earnings (or "P/E") ratio of 6.9x LX Semicon Co., Ltd. (KRX:108320) may be sending bullish signals at the moment, given that almost half of all companies in Korea have P/E ratios greater than 14x and even P/E's higher than 29x are not unusual. However, the P/E might be low for a reason and it requires further investigation to determine if it's justified.

With earnings growth that's superior to most other companies of late, LX Semicon has been doing relatively well. It might be that many expect the strong earnings performance to degrade substantially, which has repressed the P/E. If you like the company, you'd be hoping this isn't the case so that you could potentially pick up some stock while it's out of favour.

Check out our latest analysis for LX Semicon

pe-multiple-vs-industry
KOSE:A108320 Price to Earnings Ratio vs Industry July 25th 2025
Want the full picture on analyst estimates for the company? Then our free report on LX Semicon will help you uncover what's on the horizon.
Advertisement

Does Growth Match The Low P/E?

LX Semicon's P/E ratio would be typical for a company that's only expected to deliver limited growth, and importantly, perform worse than the market.

Taking a look back first, we see that the company grew earnings per share by an impressive 29% last year. Still, incredibly EPS has fallen 60% in total from three years ago, which is quite disappointing. Therefore, it's fair to say the earnings growth recently has been undesirable for the company.

Looking ahead now, EPS is anticipated to climb by 9.9% per annum during the coming three years according to the seven analysts following the company. Meanwhile, the rest of the market is forecast to expand by 19% each year, which is noticeably more attractive.

In light of this, it's understandable that LX Semicon's P/E sits below the majority of other companies. It seems most investors are expecting to see limited future growth and are only willing to pay a reduced amount for the stock.

The Final Word

Using the price-to-earnings ratio alone to determine if you should sell your stock isn't sensible, however it can be a practical guide to the company's future prospects.

As we suspected, our examination of LX Semicon's analyst forecasts revealed that its inferior earnings outlook is contributing to its low P/E. At this stage investors feel the potential for an improvement in earnings isn't great enough to justify a higher P/E ratio. It's hard to see the share price rising strongly in the near future under these circumstances.

It's always necessary to consider the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with LX Semicon (at least 1 which is a bit concerning), and understanding these should be part of your investment process.

If P/E ratios interest you, you may wish to see this free collection of other companies with strong earnings growth and low P/E ratios.

New: AI Stock Screener & Alerts

Our new AI Stock Screener scans the market every day to uncover opportunities.

• Dividend Powerhouses (3%+ Yield)
• Undervalued Small Caps with Insider Buying
• High growth Tech and AI Companies

Or build your own from over 50 metrics.

Explore Now for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.