These 4 Measures Indicate That TECHNOLOGIES (TSE:5248) Is Using Debt Extensively

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies TECHNOLOGIES, Inc. (TSE:5248) makes use of debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

Advertisement

When Is Debt Dangerous?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

What Is TECHNOLOGIES's Net Debt?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of October 2025 TECHNOLOGIES had JP¥8.87b of debt, an increase on JP¥7.58b, over one year. However, it does have JP¥3.07b in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about JP¥5.80b.

debt-equity-history-analysis
TSE:5248 Debt to Equity History December 17th 2025

How Strong Is TECHNOLOGIES' Balance Sheet?

According to the last reported balance sheet, TECHNOLOGIES had liabilities of JP¥9.12b due within 12 months, and liabilities of JP¥5.94b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had JP¥3.07b in cash and JP¥1.31b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling JP¥10.7b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

Given this deficit is actually higher than the company's market capitalization of JP¥8.12b, we think shareholders really should watch TECHNOLOGIES's debt levels, like a parent watching their child ride a bike for the first time. In the scenario where the company had to clean up its balance sheet quickly, it seems likely shareholders would suffer extensive dilution.

See our latest analysis for TECHNOLOGIES

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

TECHNOLOGIES's net debt is 3.0 times its EBITDA, which is a significant but still reasonable amount of leverage. However, its interest coverage of 13.5 is very high, suggesting that the interest expense on the debt is currently quite low. Importantly, TECHNOLOGIES grew its EBIT by 31% over the last twelve months, and that growth will make it easier to handle its debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is TECHNOLOGIES's earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Over the last three years, TECHNOLOGIES recorded negative free cash flow, in total. Debt is far more risky for companies with unreliable free cash flow, so shareholders should be hoping that the past expenditure will produce free cash flow in the future.

Our View

While TECHNOLOGIES's level of total liabilities has us nervous. To wit both its interest cover and EBIT growth rate were encouraging signs. Taking the abovementioned factors together we do think TECHNOLOGIES's debt poses some risks to the business. So while that leverage does boost returns on equity, we wouldn't really want to see it increase from here. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example TECHNOLOGIES has 2 warning signs (and 1 which is a bit unpleasant) we think you should know about.

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.

Discover if TECHNOLOGIES might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.

Access Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

MI
mitchell_lawler
mitchell_lawler

Nvidia's (NVDA) record profit had a US$7.8 billion catch. That chunk came from betting on its own customers, not from selling its chips.

137
JA
Jake_Merritt
Jake_Merritt

The circularity worth examining is not the mark-to-market line. A large and growing share of Nvidia's revenue comes from companies funded by venture capital, and Nvidia participates in some of those rounds. That is the loop. The paper gains are just an accounting reflection of it, so focusing on them means arguing about the mirror rather than the room.

NA
nadia_y3d8i

Hyperscalers grew 13% sequentially, the other AI segment grew 25% and 138% year on year. The faster half is the funded half. AI venture funding was over 400 billion in the first half with about 70% spent on compute. That is an interesting composition shift like I mentioned yesterday.

Andrew Legget

Great earnings season, but are the earnings real?

Great earnings season, but are the earnings real? cover
At first glance, this was the strongest earnings season in years. But when you look at where the growth actually came from, the story splits into two very different pictures.
00

About TSE:5248

TECHNOLOGIES

Provides IT solutions in the areas of AI and entertainment software fields in Japan.

Mediocre balance sheet with low risk.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

LO
Lou_Basenese
ONCY logo
Lou_Basenese on Oncolytics Biotech ·

The Team Behind a $2 Billion Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) Deal Just Took Over This $105 Million Cancer Biotech

Fair Value:US$3.575.7% undervalued
22 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
7 users have liked this narrative
TR
tripledub
Recommended Voice
META logo
tripledub on Meta Platforms ·

The $135 Billion Bet That Should Make Every Shareholder Nervous

Fair Value:US$5862.5% undervalued
57 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
34 users have liked this narrative
TA
Talos
Emerging Author
VOYG logo
Talos on Voyager Technologies ·

The "Landlord of Orbit" – A Deep Value Play Ahead of the Starlab Era

Fair Value:US$385.291.0% undervalued
55 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
6 users have liked this narrative
IV
Emerging Author
UBER logo
Ivoed on Uber Technologies ·

Uber’s Valuation Depends On Who Captures The Economics Of Driverless Rides

Fair Value:US$11633.7% undervalued
12 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
3 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

SA
SashaJ
ALAB logo
SashaJ on Astera Labs ·

Astera Labs - A Great Story But At What Price

Fair Value:US$335.829.4% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
RI
Ricardinho
SXE logo
Ricardinho on Southern Cross Electrical Engineering ·

Southern Cross Electrical Engineering (ASX: SXE): A Long-Duration Opportunity, With Near-Term Noise

Fair Value:AU$4.0710.6% overvalued
6 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
ES
SORENTO logo
Ester on Sorento Capital Berhad ·

Sorento Capital Berhad: Earnings Strengthened by Margin Expansion and Cost Discipline

Fair Value:RM 0.8826.1% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

OS
oscargarcia
NVDA logo
oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

Fair Value:US$28018.6% undervalued
365 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
CU
MSFT logo
CubanEros on Microsoft ·

A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Fair Value:US$419.9120.3% overvalued
213 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative
KI
AMZN logo
KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

Fair Value:US$475.0946.1% undervalued
236 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

AL
BUSER logo
AlfredB on Bambuser ·

Very Intresting Times for Bambuser

1
|
0
TT
6831 logo
TThe on Green Tea Group ·

Green tea dropped so much today

0
|
0
TE
HALO logo
Teg on Halozyme Therapeutics ·

You left out SnapShot.

0
|
0