Stock Analysis

GFA (TSE:8783) Is Making Moderate Use Of Debt

TSE:8783
Source: Shutterstock

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. Importantly, GFA Co., Ltd. (TSE:8783) does carry debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

Advertisement

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

What Is GFA's Debt?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that GFA had debt of JP¥2.54b at the end of March 2025, a reduction from JP¥3.38b over a year. On the flip side, it has JP¥379.0m in cash leading to net debt of about JP¥2.16b.

debt-equity-history-analysis
TSE:8783 Debt to Equity History June 28th 2025

How Strong Is GFA's Balance Sheet?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that GFA had liabilities of JP¥4.64b falling due within a year, and liabilities of JP¥349.0m due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of JP¥379.0m and JP¥2.08b worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling JP¥2.53b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

GFA has a market capitalization of JP¥7.31b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is GFA's earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.

View our latest analysis for GFA

Over 12 months, GFA made a loss at the EBIT level, and saw its revenue drop to JP¥3.3b, which is a fall of 21%. To be frank that doesn't bode well.

Caveat Emptor

While GFA's falling revenue is about as heartwarming as a wet blanket, arguably its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) loss is even less appealing. Indeed, it lost a very considerable JP¥2.6b at the EBIT level. Considering that alongside the liabilities mentioned above does not give us much confidence that company should be using so much debt. Quite frankly we think the balance sheet is far from match-fit, although it could be improved with time. However, it doesn't help that it burned through JP¥2.6b of cash over the last year. So in short it's a really risky stock. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. We've identified 5 warning signs with GFA (at least 4 which shouldn't be ignored) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One Place

We've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.

• Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency
• Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile
• Track the Fair Value of your stocks

Try a Demo Portfolio for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.