Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that Softec S.p.A. (BIT:YSFT) does use debt in its business. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
View our latest analysis for Softec
How Much Debt Does Softec Carry?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of June 2021 Softec had €1.77m of debt, an increase on €414.3k, over one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of €765.0k, its net debt is less, at about €1.00m.
How Strong Is Softec's Balance Sheet?
The latest balance sheet data shows that Softec had liabilities of €3.87m due within a year, and liabilities of €3.39m falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of €765.0k as well as receivables valued at €2.16m due within 12 months. So its liabilities total €4.34m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
This is a mountain of leverage relative to its market capitalization of €5.35m. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since Softec will need earnings to service that debt. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.
In the last year Softec had a loss before interest and tax, and actually shrunk its revenue by 14%, to €5.4m. That's not what we would hope to see.
Caveat Emptor
While Softec's falling revenue is about as heartwarming as a wet blanket, arguably its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) loss is even less appealing. Indeed, it lost a very considerable €1.2m at the EBIT level. Considering that alongside the liabilities mentioned above does not give us much confidence that company should be using so much debt. Quite frankly we think the balance sheet is far from match-fit, although it could be improved with time. However, it doesn't help that it burned through €564k of cash over the last year. So suffice it to say we consider the stock very risky. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Softec (of which 2 can't be ignored!) you should know about.
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One Place
We've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.
• Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency
• Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile
• Track the Fair Value of your stocks
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
About BIT:YSFT
Softec
Softec S.p.A. operates in the digital innovation services sector in Italy and internationally.
Slightly overvalued with weak fundamentals.
Market Insights
Weekly Picks

Ferrari's Intrinsic and Historical Valuation

Investment Thesis: Costco Wholesale (COST)
Undervalued Key Player in Magnets/Rare Earth
Recently Updated Narratives

Investing in the future with RGYAS as fair value hits 228.23

The global leader in cash handling

Wolters Kluwer - A Fundamental and Historical Valuation
Popular Narratives

The "Sleeping Giant" Stumbles, Then Wakes Up
Undervalued Key Player in Magnets/Rare Earth

NVDA: Expanding AI Demand Will Drive Major Data Center Investments Through 2026
Trending Discussion

I'm exiting the positions at great return! WRLG got great competent management. But, 100k oz gold too small in today environment. They might looking for M/A opportunity in the future, or they might get take over by Aris Mining, I don't know. But, Frank Giustra stated he's believed in multi-assets, so that's my speculation. Anyhow, I want to be aggressive in today's gold price. I'm buying Lahontan Gold LG with this as exchange. Higher upside, more leverage. WRLG CEO is BOD's of LG, that's something. This will be my last update on WRLG, good luck!
Thanks for your post but some of your calculations are wrong. It is only the actual silver that should be priced at 100/oz, not the zink and lead. The actual silver is about 5 million ounces and the rest is biproducts which cannot be calculated as 100/oz per silver equivalent. Since it would now require alot more zink and lead to create 1 AgEq with the current silver price which means their AgEq would become lower even if the production remains the same. I am still very bullish on the stock and I own it.
