Read This Before You Buy Pulz Electronics Limited (NSE:PULZ) Because Of Its P/E Ratio

The goal of this article is to teach you how to use price to earnings ratios (P/E ratios). We’ll show how you can use Pulz Electronics Limited’s (NSE:PULZ) P/E ratio to inform your assessment of the investment opportunity. Based on the last twelve months, Pulz Electronics’s P/E ratio is 4.45. That means that at current prices, buyers pay ₹4.45 for every ₹1 in trailing yearly profits.

View our latest analysis for Pulz Electronics

How Do I Calculate A Price To Earnings Ratio?

The formula for P/E is:

Price to Earnings Ratio = Share Price ÷ Earnings per Share (EPS)

Or for Pulz Electronics:

P/E of 4.45 = ₹26.5 ÷ ₹5.96 (Based on the year to March 2018.)

Is A High P/E Ratio Good?

A higher P/E ratio means that investors are paying a higher price for each ₹1 of company earnings. All else being equal, it’s better to pay a low price — but as Warren Buffett said, ‘It’s far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price.’

How Growth Rates Impact P/E Ratios

Earnings growth rates have a big influence on P/E ratios. When earnings grow, the ‘E’ increases, over time. Therefore, even if you pay a high multiple of earnings now, that multiple will become lower in the future. Then, a lower P/E should attract more buyers, pushing the share price up.

Pulz Electronics’s earnings per share fell by 11% in the last twelve months. But over the longer term (5 years) earnings per share have increased by 48%.

How Does Pulz Electronics’s P/E Ratio Compare To Its Peers?

The P/E ratio indicates whether the market has higher or lower expectations of a company. The image below shows that Pulz Electronics has a lower P/E than the average (17.7) P/E for companies in the consumer durables industry.

NSEI:PULZ PE PEG Gauge October 26th 18
NSEI:PULZ PE PEG Gauge October 26th 18

Its relatively low P/E ratio indicates that Pulz Electronics shareholders think it will struggle to do as well as other companies in its industry classification. While current expectations are low, the stock could be undervalued if the situation is better than the market assumes. You should delve deeper. I like to check if company insiders have been buying or selling.

Remember: P/E Ratios Don’t Consider The Balance Sheet

Don’t forget that the P/E ratio considers market capitalization. In other words, it does not consider any debt or cash that the company may have on the balance sheet. Theoretically, a business can improve its earnings (and produce a lower P/E in the future), by taking on debt (or spending its remaining cash).

Spending on growth might be good or bad a few years later, but the point is that the P/E ratio does not account for the option (or lack thereof).

How Does Pulz Electronics’s Debt Impact Its P/E Ratio?

Since Pulz Electronics holds net cash of ₹14m, it can spend on growth, justifying a higher P/E ratio than otherwise.

The Bottom Line On Pulz Electronics’s P/E Ratio

Pulz Electronics’s P/E is 4.4 which is below average (17) in the IN market. The recent drop in earnings per share would almost certainly temper expectations, but the net cash position means the company has time to improve: if so, the low P/E could be an opportunity.

Investors have an opportunity when market expectations about a stock are wrong. If the reality for a company is not as bad as the P/E ratio indicates, then the share price should increase as the market realizes this. We don’t have analyst forecasts, but you could get a better understanding of its growth by checking out this more detailed historical graph of earnings, revenue and cash flow.

But note: Pulz Electronics may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with strong recent earnings growth (and a P/E ratio below 20).

To help readers see past the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned. For errors that warrant correction please contact the editor at