- Israel
- /
- Real Estate
- /
- TASE:GCT
Public companies who hold 48% of G City Ltd (TLV:GCT) gained 13%, institutions profited as well
Key Insights
- Significant control over G City by public companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 58% ownership
- Institutional ownership in G City is 29%
A look at the shareholders of G City Ltd (TLV:GCT) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 48% to be precise, is public companies. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
While public companies were the group that benefitted the most from last week’s ₪205m market cap gain, institutions too had a 29% share in those profits.
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of G City.
View our latest analysis for G City
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About G City?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
G City already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of G City, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in G City. The company's largest shareholder is Norstar Holdings Inc, with ownership of 48%. The second and third largest shareholders are Shlomo Eliahu Holding Ltd, Asset Management Arm and Menora Mivtachim Pensions & Gemel Ltd., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 9.6%.
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
Insider Ownership Of G City
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
Our information suggests that G City Ltd insiders own under 1% of the company. It seems the board members have no more than ₪13m worth of shares in the ₪1.8b company. We generally like to see a board more invested. However it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
General Public Ownership
With a 22% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over G City. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
Public Company Ownership
We can see that public companies hold 48% of the G City shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.
Next Steps:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand G City better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that G City is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is significant...
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One Place
We've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.
• Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency
• Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile
• Track the Fair Value of your stocks
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
About TASE:GCT
G City
Through its subsidiaries, owns, develops, manages, and operates supermarket-anchored urban shopping centers and retail-based mixed-use properties in Israel, North America, Brazil, and Northern and Central Europe.
Good value with mediocre balance sheet.