Stock Analysis

These 4 Measures Indicate That Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) (TLV:BSEN) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

TASE:BSEN
Source: Shutterstock

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We note that Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) Ltd (TLV:BSEN) does have debt on its balance sheet. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

Check out our latest analysis for Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)

What Is Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)'s Debt?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) had US$38.9m of debt in June 2024, down from US$74.6m, one year before. Net debt is about the same, since the it doesn't have much cash.

debt-equity-history-analysis
TASE:BSEN Debt to Equity History October 10th 2024

How Healthy Is Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)'s Balance Sheet?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) had liabilities of US$92.3m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$40.5m due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$612.0k in cash and US$48.3m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$84.0m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

Given Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) has a market capitalization of US$631.5m, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. However, we do think it is worth keeping an eye on its balance sheet strength, as it may change over time.

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

Looking at its net debt to EBITDA of 0.82 and interest cover of 6.8 times, it seems to us that Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) is probably using debt in a pretty reasonable way. But the interest payments are certainly sufficient to have us thinking about how affordable its debt is. Better yet, Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) grew its EBIT by 169% last year, which is an impressive improvement. If maintained that growth will make the debt even more manageable in the years ahead. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)'s earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So when considering debt, it's definitely worth looking at the earnings trend. Click here for an interactive snapshot.

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) recorded free cash flow worth 69% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

Our View

The good news is that Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)'s demonstrated ability to grow its EBIT delights us like a fluffy puppy does a toddler. And that's just the beginning of the good news since its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow is also very heartening. Looking at the bigger picture, we think Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)'s use of debt seems quite reasonable and we're not concerned about it. While debt does bring risk, when used wisely it can also bring a higher return on equity. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) (of which 1 is concerning!) you should know about.

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.

Discover if Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.

Access Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.