Stock Analysis

Shanghai Industrial Holdings (HKG:363) Has Some Way To Go To Become A Multi-Bagger

SEHK:363
Source: Shutterstock

Did you know there are some financial metrics that can provide clues of a potential multi-bagger? One common approach is to try and find a company with returns on capital employed (ROCE) that are increasing, in conjunction with a growing amount of capital employed. This shows us that it's a compounding machine, able to continually reinvest its earnings back into the business and generate higher returns. Although, when we looked at Shanghai Industrial Holdings (HKG:363), it didn't seem to tick all of these boxes.

What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?

For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. The formula for this calculation on Shanghai Industrial Holdings is:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

0.069 = HK$9.2b ÷ (HK$175b - HK$42b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).

Thus, Shanghai Industrial Holdings has an ROCE of 6.9%. In absolute terms, that's a low return, but it's much better than the Industrials industry average of 3.0%.

See our latest analysis for Shanghai Industrial Holdings

roce
SEHK:363 Return on Capital Employed September 2nd 2024

In the above chart we have measured Shanghai Industrial Holdings' prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free analyst report for Shanghai Industrial Holdings .

What Can We Tell From Shanghai Industrial Holdings' ROCE Trend?

Over the past five years, Shanghai Industrial Holdings' ROCE and capital employed have both remained mostly flat. It's not uncommon to see this when looking at a mature and stable business that isn't re-investing its earnings because it has likely passed that phase of the business cycle. With that in mind, unless investment picks up again in the future, we wouldn't expect Shanghai Industrial Holdings to be a multi-bagger going forward.

What We Can Learn From Shanghai Industrial Holdings' ROCE

We can conclude that in regards to Shanghai Industrial Holdings' returns on capital employed and the trends, there isn't much change to report on. And with the stock having returned a mere 12% in the last five years to shareholders, you could argue that they're aware of these lackluster trends. So if you're looking for a multi-bagger, the underlying trends indicate you may have better chances elsewhere.

One more thing: We've identified 2 warning signs with Shanghai Industrial Holdings (at least 1 which is potentially serious) , and understanding them would certainly be useful.

If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.

New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One Place

We've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.

• Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency
• Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile
• Track the Fair Value of your stocks

Try a Demo Portfolio for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.