Stock Analysis

Does Kerlink (EPA:ALKLK) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

ENXTPA:ALKLK
Source: Shutterstock

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We note that Kerlink SA (EPA:ALKLK) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

Check out our latest analysis for Kerlink

What Is Kerlink's Net Debt?

The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Kerlink had €12.4m in debt in June 2024; about the same as the year before. However, it does have €5.30m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about €7.13m.

debt-equity-history-analysis
ENXTPA:ALKLK Debt to Equity History December 20th 2024

How Healthy Is Kerlink's Balance Sheet?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Kerlink had liabilities of €7.65m due within a year, and liabilities of €11.0m falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of €5.30m as well as receivables valued at €2.80m due within 12 months. So its liabilities total €10.6m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

This deficit casts a shadow over the €3.61m company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we definitely think shareholders need to watch this one closely. After all, Kerlink would likely require a major re-capitalisation if it had to pay its creditors today. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Kerlink can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Over 12 months, Kerlink made a loss at the EBIT level, and saw its revenue drop to €13m, which is a fall of 14%. That's not what we would hope to see.

Caveat Emptor

While Kerlink's falling revenue is about as heartwarming as a wet blanket, arguably its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) loss is even less appealing. Indeed, it lost a very considerable €3.0m at the EBIT level. If you consider the significant liabilities mentioned above, we are extremely wary of this investment. Of course, it may be able to improve its situation with a bit of luck and good execution. But we think that is unlikely since it is low on liquid assets, and made a loss of €4.0m in the last year. So we think this stock is quite risky. We'd prefer to pass. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Kerlink (1 can't be ignored!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.

Discover if Kerlink might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.

Access Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.