The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We note that GFT Technologies SE (ETR:GFT) does have debt on its balance sheet. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
What Is GFT Technologies's Debt?
As you can see below, GFT Technologies had €139.3m of debt, at September 2025, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, because it has a cash reserve of €46.2m, its net debt is less, at about €93.0m.
How Healthy Is GFT Technologies' Balance Sheet?
Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that GFT Technologies had liabilities of €261.1m due within 12 months and liabilities of €113.1m due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of €46.2m and €218.7m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total €109.2m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
GFT Technologies has a market capitalization of €501.8m, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.
See our latest analysis for GFT Technologies
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
GFT Technologies's net debt is only 1.4 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 13.4 times over. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. In fact GFT Technologies's saving grace is its low debt levels, because its EBIT has tanked 24% in the last twelve months. When a company sees its earnings tank, it can sometimes find its relationships with its lenders turn sour. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if GFT Technologies can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, GFT Technologies recorded free cash flow worth 70% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.
Our View
GFT Technologies's EBIT growth rate was a real negative on this analysis, although the other factors we considered were considerably better. In particular, we are dazzled with its interest cover. Considering this range of data points, we think GFT Technologies is in a good position to manage its debt levels. But a word of caution: we think debt levels are high enough to justify ongoing monitoring. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with GFT Technologies .
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One Place
We've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.
• Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency
• Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile
• Track the Fair Value of your stocks
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
About XTRA:GFT
GFT Technologies
Provides digital transformation services.
Very undervalued with flawless balance sheet and pays a dividend.
Similar Companies
Market Insights
Weekly Picks

Is Ubisoft the Market’s Biggest Pricing Error? Why Forensic Value Points to €33 Per Share

EU#4 - Turning Heritage into the World’s Strongest Luxury Empire

The "Easy Money" Is Gone: Why Alphabet Is Now a "Show Me" Story
Recently Updated Narratives

Novo Nordisk - A Fundamental and Historical Valuation

Is Ubisoft the Market’s Biggest Pricing Error? Why Forensic Value Points to €33 Per Share

The "David vs. Goliath" AI Trade – Why Second Place is Worth Billions
Popular Narratives

The "Sleeping Giant" Stumbles, Then Wakes Up
Undervalued Key Player in Magnets/Rare Earth
