Stock Analysis

Pinning Down Fabasoft AG's (ETR:FAA) P/E Is Difficult Right Now

XTRA:FAA
Source: Shutterstock

When close to half the companies in Germany have price-to-earnings ratios (or "P/E's") below 15x, you may consider Fabasoft AG (ETR:FAA) as a stock to potentially avoid with its 21.7x P/E ratio. Nonetheless, we'd need to dig a little deeper to determine if there is a rational basis for the elevated P/E.

Recent times have been advantageous for Fabasoft as its earnings have been rising faster than most other companies. It seems that many are expecting the strong earnings performance to persist, which has raised the P/E. You'd really hope so, otherwise you're paying a pretty hefty price for no particular reason.

View our latest analysis for Fabasoft

pe-multiple-vs-industry
XTRA:FAA Price to Earnings Ratio vs Industry November 12th 2024
Keen to find out how analysts think Fabasoft's future stacks up against the industry? In that case, our free report is a great place to start.

Is There Enough Growth For Fabasoft?

In order to justify its P/E ratio, Fabasoft would need to produce impressive growth in excess of the market.

Retrospectively, the last year delivered an exceptional 27% gain to the company's bottom line. As a result, it also grew EPS by 23% in total over the last three years. Accordingly, shareholders would have probably been satisfied with the medium-term rates of earnings growth.

Turning to the outlook, the next three years should generate growth of 6.0% each year as estimated by the dual analysts watching the company. That's shaping up to be materially lower than the 16% each year growth forecast for the broader market.

With this information, we find it concerning that Fabasoft is trading at a P/E higher than the market. It seems most investors are hoping for a turnaround in the company's business prospects, but the analyst cohort is not so confident this will happen. There's a good chance these shareholders are setting themselves up for future disappointment if the P/E falls to levels more in line with the growth outlook.

The Bottom Line On Fabasoft's P/E

Generally, our preference is to limit the use of the price-to-earnings ratio to establishing what the market thinks about the overall health of a company.

Our examination of Fabasoft's analyst forecasts revealed that its inferior earnings outlook isn't impacting its high P/E anywhere near as much as we would have predicted. Right now we are increasingly uncomfortable with the high P/E as the predicted future earnings aren't likely to support such positive sentiment for long. Unless these conditions improve markedly, it's very challenging to accept these prices as being reasonable.

It's always necessary to consider the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Fabasoft, and understanding should be part of your investment process.

If these risks are making you reconsider your opinion on Fabasoft, explore our interactive list of high quality stocks to get an idea of what else is out there.

New: AI Stock Screener & Alerts

Our new AI Stock Screener scans the market every day to uncover opportunities.

• Dividend Powerhouses (3%+ Yield)
• Undervalued Small Caps with Insider Buying
• High growth Tech and AI Companies

Or build your own from over 50 metrics.

Explore Now for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.