Stock Analysis

Slowing Rates Of Return At Guangdong Construction Engineering Group (SZSE:002060) Leave Little Room For Excitement

SZSE:002060
Source: Shutterstock

If we want to find a stock that could multiply over the long term, what are the underlying trends we should look for? One common approach is to try and find a company with returns on capital employed (ROCE) that are increasing, in conjunction with a growing amount of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. However, after investigating Guangdong Construction Engineering Group (SZSE:002060), we don't think it's current trends fit the mold of a multi-bagger.

Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)

If you haven't worked with ROCE before, it measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Guangdong Construction Engineering Group:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

0.07 = CN¥2.6b ÷ (CN¥131b - CN¥94b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2024).

Thus, Guangdong Construction Engineering Group has an ROCE of 7.0%. On its own, that's a low figure but it's around the 6.4% average generated by the Construction industry.

View our latest analysis for Guangdong Construction Engineering Group

roce
SZSE:002060 Return on Capital Employed May 28th 2024

In the above chart we have measured Guangdong Construction Engineering Group's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Guangdong Construction Engineering Group for free.

What The Trend Of ROCE Can Tell Us

In terms of Guangdong Construction Engineering Group's historical ROCE trend, it doesn't exactly demand attention. The company has employed 267% more capital in the last five years, and the returns on that capital have remained stable at 7.0%. Given the company has increased the amount of capital employed, it appears the investments that have been made simply don't provide a high return on capital.

On another note, while the change in ROCE trend might not scream for attention, it's interesting that the current liabilities have actually gone up over the last five years. This is intriguing because if current liabilities hadn't increased to 72% of total assets, this reported ROCE would probably be less than7.0% because total capital employed would be higher.The 7.0% ROCE could be even lower if current liabilities weren't 72% of total assets, because the the formula would show a larger base of total capital employed. So with current liabilities at such high levels, this effectively means the likes of suppliers or short-term creditors are funding a meaningful part of the business, which in some instances can bring some risks.

The Bottom Line On Guangdong Construction Engineering Group's ROCE

As we've seen above, Guangdong Construction Engineering Group's returns on capital haven't increased but it is reinvesting in the business. Although the market must be expecting these trends to improve because the stock has gained 44% over the last five years. Ultimately, if the underlying trends persist, we wouldn't hold our breath on it being a multi-bagger going forward.

On a final note, we found 4 warning signs for Guangdong Construction Engineering Group (2 are potentially serious) you should be aware of.

If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.

Valuation is complex, but we're helping make it simple.

Find out whether Guangdong Construction Engineering Group is potentially over or undervalued by checking out our comprehensive analysis, which includes fair value estimates, risks and warnings, dividends, insider transactions and financial health.

View the Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.