Stock Analysis

Return Trends At Jangho Group (SHSE:601886) Aren't Appealing

SHSE:601886
Source: Shutterstock

Did you know there are some financial metrics that can provide clues of a potential multi-bagger? Ideally, a business will show two trends; firstly a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and secondly, an increasing amount of capital employed. Basically this means that a company has profitable initiatives that it can continue to reinvest in, which is a trait of a compounding machine. However, after investigating Jangho Group (SHSE:601886), we don't think it's current trends fit the mold of a multi-bagger.

What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?

For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. To calculate this metric for Jangho Group, this is the formula:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

0.11 = CN¥1.1b ÷ (CN¥27b - CN¥18b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2023).

So, Jangho Group has an ROCE of 11%. In absolute terms, that's a satisfactory return, but compared to the Construction industry average of 7.0% it's much better.

View our latest analysis for Jangho Group

roce
SHSE:601886 Return on Capital Employed March 27th 2024

Above you can see how the current ROCE for Jangho Group compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Jangho Group for free.

So How Is Jangho Group's ROCE Trending?

There hasn't been much to report for Jangho Group's returns and its level of capital employed because both metrics have been steady for the past five years. Businesses with these traits tend to be mature and steady operations because they're past the growth phase. So don't be surprised if Jangho Group doesn't end up being a multi-bagger in a few years time.

Another thing to note, Jangho Group has a high ratio of current liabilities to total assets of 66%. This effectively means that suppliers (or short-term creditors) are funding a large portion of the business, so just be aware that this can introduce some elements of risk. Ideally we'd like to see this reduce as that would mean fewer obligations bearing risks.

Our Take On Jangho Group's ROCE

In summary, Jangho Group isn't compounding its earnings but is generating stable returns on the same amount of capital employed. And in the last five years, the stock has given away 22% so the market doesn't look too hopeful on these trends strengthening any time soon. All in all, the inherent trends aren't typical of multi-baggers, so if that's what you're after, we think you might have more luck elsewhere.

Jangho Group does have some risks though, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Jangho Group that you might be interested in.

While Jangho Group isn't earning the highest return, check out this free list of companies that are earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets.

Valuation is complex, but we're helping make it simple.

Find out whether Jangho Group is potentially over or undervalued by checking out our comprehensive analysis, which includes fair value estimates, risks and warnings, dividends, insider transactions and financial health.

View the Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.