Magazine Luiza (BVMF:MGLU3) Has More To Do To Multiply In Value Going Forward

Simply Wall St

If we want to find a potential multi-bagger, often there are underlying trends that can provide clues. Firstly, we'd want to identify a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and then alongside that, an ever-increasing base of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. Having said that, from a first glance at Magazine Luiza (BVMF:MGLU3) we aren't jumping out of our chairs at how returns are trending, but let's have a deeper look.

Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?

For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Magazine Luiza:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

0.063 = R$1.4b ÷ (R$37b - R$15b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2025).

So, Magazine Luiza has an ROCE of 6.3%. Even though it's in line with the industry average of 6.3%, it's still a low return by itself.

See our latest analysis for Magazine Luiza

BOVESPA:MGLU3 Return on Capital Employed December 17th 2025

Above you can see how the current ROCE for Magazine Luiza compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free analyst report for Magazine Luiza .

So How Is Magazine Luiza's ROCE Trending?

In terms of Magazine Luiza's historical ROCE trend, it doesn't exactly demand attention. The company has consistently earned 6.3% for the last five years, and the capital employed within the business has risen 98% in that time. Given the company has increased the amount of capital employed, it appears the investments that have been made simply don't provide a high return on capital.

On a separate but related note, it's important to know that Magazine Luiza has a current liabilities to total assets ratio of 41%, which we'd consider pretty high. This effectively means that suppliers (or short-term creditors) are funding a large portion of the business, so just be aware that this can introduce some elements of risk. While it's not necessarily a bad thing, it can be beneficial if this ratio is lower.

What We Can Learn From Magazine Luiza's ROCE

As we've seen above, Magazine Luiza's returns on capital haven't increased but it is reinvesting in the business. Moreover, since the stock has crumbled 96% over the last five years, it appears investors are expecting the worst. In any case, the stock doesn't have these traits of a multi-bagger discussed above, so if that's what you're looking for, we think you'd have more luck elsewhere.

On a final note, we've found 3 warning signs for Magazine Luiza that we think you should be aware of.

If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.

Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.

Discover if Magazine Luiza might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.

Access Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.