What You Must Know About STEMify Limited's (ASX:SF1) Beta Value

    If you're interested in STEMify Limited (ASX:SF1), then you might want to consider its beta (a measure of share price volatility) in order to understand how the stock could impact your portfolio. Volatility is considered to be a measure of risk in modern finance theory. Investors may think of volatility as falling into two main categories. The first category is company specific volatility. This can be dealt with by limiting your exposure to any particular stock. The second type is the broader market volatility, which you cannot diversify away, since it arises from macroeconomic factors which directly affects all the stocks on the market.

    Some stocks see their prices move in concert with the market. Others tend towards stronger, gentler or unrelated price movements. Beta is a widely used metric to measure a stock's exposure to market risk (volatility). Before we go on, it's worth noting that Warren Buffett pointed out in his 2014 letter to shareholders that 'volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' Having said that, beta can still be rather useful. The first thing to understand about beta is that the beta of the overall market is one. A stock with a beta greater than one is more sensitive to broader market movements than a stock with a beta of less than one.

    View our latest analysis for STEMify

    Advertisement

    What we can learn from SF1's beta value

    Given that it has a beta of 1.16, we can surmise that the STEMify share price has been fairly sensitive to market volatility (over the last 5 years). Based on this history, investors should be aware that STEMify are likely to rise strongly in times of greed, but sell off in times of fear. Share price volatility is well worth considering, but most long term investors consider the history of revenue and earnings growth to be more important. Take a look at how STEMify fares in that regard, below.

    ASX:SF1 Income Statement, September 25th 2019
    ASX:SF1 Income Statement, September 25th 2019

    How does SF1's size impact its beta?

    STEMify is a noticeably small company, with a market capitalisation of AU$3.8m. Most companies this size are not always actively traded. It has a relatively high beta, suggesting it is fairly actively traded for a company of its size. Because it takes less capital to move the share price of a small company like this, when a stock this size is actively traded it is quite often more sensitive to market volatility than similar large companies.

    What this means for you:

    Since STEMify has a reasonably high beta, it's worth considering why it is so heavily influenced by broader market sentiment. For example, it might be a high growth stock or have a lot of operating leverage in its business model. This article aims to educate investors about beta values, but it's well worth looking at important company-specific fundamentals such as STEMify’s financial health and performance track record. I urge you to continue your research by taking a look at the following:

    1. Financial Health: Are SF1’s operations financially sustainable? Balance sheets can be hard to analyze, which is why we’ve done it for you. Check out our financial health checks here.
    2. Other High-Performing Stocks: Are there other stocks that provide better prospects with proven track records? Explore our free list of these great stocks here.

    We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

    If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.

    M
    mitchell_lawler
    mitchell_lawler

    Everyone's watching the oil price. The harder problem is the gas that can't take a detour.

    Everyone's watching the oil price. The harder problem is the gas that can't take a detour. cover
    98
    R
    Rob_Curious

    What I've learnt in the last six months is that fuel supply disruption is a real portfolio risk, and one of the better hedges is a small allocation to shipping. Though it's insane how much these have run up this year.

    f
    frank_ub3n0

    Spot on. Shipping and logistics is much larger constraint for gas than oil. Sorry to break it to you. No quick fixes for that.

    Mitchell Lawler

    What happens to energy stocks as the fix gets built?

    What happens to energy stocks as the fix gets built? cover
    Conflict around the Strait of Hormuz has led investors to oil and tankers. The trouble is, the antidote to the chokepoints is already being built, and it may not reward the same energy stocks.
    21
    Advertisement

    Weekly Picks

    CE
    Ceazar
    SPAI logo
    Ceazar on Sparc AI ·

    When GPS fails: this small cap is fixing a $54B drone problem

    Fair Value:CA$5.2532.6% undervalued
    205 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    31 users have liked this narrative
    CO
    composite32
    Emerging Author
    AROC logo
    composite32 on Archrock ·

    AI Needs Power. Power Needs Gas. Gas Needs Compression: The Archrock Investment Thesis

    Fair Value:US$44.8829.7% undervalued
    32 users have followed this narrative
    2 users have commented on this narrative
    3 users have liked this narrative
    JO
    John_Eric
    Emerging Author
    AEIS logo
    John_Eric on Advanced Energy Industries ·

    AEIS Is Firing on Every Cylinder. My Problem Is the Safety Factor.

    Fair Value:US$567.8653.8% undervalued
    18 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    7 users have liked this narrative
    IS
    LRCX logo
    isidrohg on Lam Research ·

    The Memory Shortage Is Lam's Order Book — Whether It Persists Or Resolves

    Fair Value:US$423.8532.0% undervalued
    23 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    7 users have liked this narrative

    Updated Narratives

    AN
    andrei9868
    APP logo
    andrei9868 on AppLovin ·

    Axon Is Still Compounding — the Market Is Pricing a Broken Growth Story

    Fair Value:US$46233.3% undervalued
    0 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    AN
    andrei9868
    FSLR logo
    andrei9868 on First Solar ·

    The Market Is Pricing Policy Noise — Not 45 GW of Contracted U.S. Modules

    Fair Value:US$26325.5% undervalued
    0 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    TR
    TradeGenious
    CM
    TradeGenious on Caledonia Mining ·

    Caledonia Mining (CMCL): A $49 Intrinsic Value Trapped Behind a Sovereign Risk Wall

    Fair Value:US$49.4351.2% undervalued
    1 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative

    Popular Narratives

    AN
    AnalystConsensusTarget
    NVDA logo
    AnalystConsensusTarget on NVIDIA ·

    NVDA: Expanding AI Demand Will Drive Major Data Center Investments Through 2026

    Fair Value:US$302.8326.6% undervalued
    1476 users have followed this narrative
    8 users have commented on this narrative
    35 users have liked this narrative
    AN
    AnalystConsensusTarget
    GOOGL logo
    AnalystConsensusTarget on Alphabet ·

    GOOGL: AI Platform Expansion And Cloud Demand Will Support Durable Performance Amid Competitive Pressures

    Fair Value:US$427.8918.3% undervalued
    1642 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    19 users have liked this narrative
    AN
    AnalystConsensusTarget
    AMZN logo
    AnalystConsensusTarget on Amazon.com ·

    AMZN: Acceleration In Cloud And AI Will Drive Margin Expansion Ahead

    Fair Value:US$32722.4% undervalued
    1654 users have followed this narrative
    1 users have commented on this narrative
    16 users have liked this narrative

    Trending Discussion

    AN
    TPG0 logo
    anthony_x0j2w on Platform Group SE KGaA ·

    Hello,(I am a shareholder).I spent the summer investigating in whatever I was able to find in the press, the trustee, or legal, and comparing it to FS Benner's declaration/transcripts:press: MM has a tendancy to use facts, modify them and turn them the way they want: 100% of their claims against TPG0 is traçable factually, 80% is flawed and interpreted. Example are numerous: 11M loans banks to be paid seems right, but it has not been an issue at all, it has been paid in full. (and it happens all the time in every business...); the previous HR becoming a financial director in the article herself being attacked by TPG on the legal side; the wrong address of curator (if truly announced by TPG).Trustee: according to my research (which can be incomplete) no communication to the Nordic trustee (hereby, bond holders) has been done on a, indebtedness (late payment) > 1M€, which is their obligation by contract (clause 14.d - https://corporate.the-platform-group.com/bond/) => this is a sign of a huge lie and fraud, or the sign that there is no indebtedness > 1M€ over the whole TPG group.Legal: still awaiting for an answer, probable that I won't get it.VALUATIONYou can spent hours working the fundamentals, if they're flawed...the thesis falls.Anyway, I always substracts the badwill (that I consider non-current - you have it in the CFS) & non-controlling interests from my valuation:Earnings ~22MFCF ~40M€The financial statements are not the issue here, we are more on an cheap option on the sincerity of the accounts that a real valuation. Unfortunately, these are unverifiable elements, hence the low price./!\ Careful:the accounts are consolidated and skip the subsidiaries issues...Careful with the business model: TPG0 is a financial holding that acquire subsidiaries, hold the debt, and has no operations. 100% of the Cash Flow comes from subs' dividends => it is a risk here, more a plumber risk than an operational one, but nevertheless...The auditor is too small, and managed by the same firm than before, with 140K€/year commission => it's too low, nobody external really reviewed what Benner and his team are doing internallycapital increase do not go through the CFS, but through change in equity AND equity in the BSIf the equity stays low too long, the WACC increase will be unbearable (I have a 30% global, with a 118% on equity): diluting is expensive => TPG machine can stay broken for a while.Most of the people I talk with never saw this, while this is ESSENTIAL to Benner's business model.SEVERAL EVENTS THAT COULD CHANGE:AEP is being audited by KPMG: if Benner plays the "we will propose KPMG to our shareholders BEOY", this can increase the trust in him significantly/KPMG (or other) to validate the 2026 IFRS accounts & having a word on HGB's: though still consolidated, at least we'll know...AEP being eventually acquired: while it carries a high integration risk due to its size, they talked about it so many times, that trust goes with it.Without this combination of event, the equity is doomed to stay at this level, IMO.Do not forget to also follow the bond: with TPG's announced safe harbor plan for buyback (25% of daily exchange), it is also interesting to check this illiquid and retail market: https://live.deutsche-boerse.com/bond/no0013256834-the-platform-group-ag-8-875-24-28?mic=XFRA

    1
    |
    0