What G4S plc's (LON:GFS) ROE Can Tell Us

    Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). We'll use ROE to examine G4S plc (LON:GFS), by way of a worked example.

    Our data shows G4S has a return on equity of 8.1% for the last year. One way to conceptualize this, is that for each £1 of shareholders' equity it has, the company made £0.08 in profit.

    View our latest analysis for G4S

    Advertisement

    How Do I Calculate ROE?

    The formula for ROE is:

    Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

    Or for G4S:

    8.1% = UK£51m ÷ UK£631m (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2019.)

    Most know that net profit is the total earnings after all expenses, but the concept of shareholders' equity is a little more complicated. It is all earnings retained by the company, plus any capital paid in by shareholders. Shareholders' equity can be calculated by subtracting the total liabilities of the company from the total assets of the company.

    What Does ROE Signify?

    Return on Equity measures a company's profitability against the profit it has kept for the business (plus any capital injections). The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. The higher the ROE, the more profit the company is making. So, all else equal, investors should like a high ROE. That means it can be interesting to compare the ROE of different companies.

    Does G4S Have A Good ROE?

    Arguably the easiest way to assess company's ROE is to compare it with the average in its industry. The limitation of this approach is that some companies are quite different from others, even within the same industry classification. The image below shows that G4S has an ROE that is roughly in line with the Commercial Services industry average (9.7%).

    LSE:GFS Past Revenue and Net Income, January 13th 2020
    LSE:GFS Past Revenue and Net Income, January 13th 2020

    That's not overly surprising. ROE can give us a view about company quality, but many investors also look to other factors, such as whether there are insiders buying shares. For those who like to find winning investments this free list of growing companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.

    How Does Debt Impact Return On Equity?

    Companies usually need to invest money to grow their profits. The cash for investment can come from prior year profits (retained earnings), issuing new shares, or borrowing. In the first two cases, the ROE will capture this use of capital to grow. In the latter case, the use of debt will improve the returns, but will not change the equity. In this manner the use of debt will boost ROE, even though the core economics of the business stay the same.

    G4S's Debt And Its 8.1% ROE

    It seems that G4S uses a lot of debt to fund the business, since it has a high debt to equity ratio of 4.35. The combination of an uninspiring ROE and high debt suggests the business isn't very attractive.

    In Summary

    Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. In my book the highest quality companies have high return on equity, despite low debt. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.

    But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. Profit growth rates, versus the expectations reflected in the price of the stock, are a particularly important to consider. So you might want to check this FREE visualization of analyst forecasts for the company.

    Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

    If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.

    We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Thank you for reading.

    MI
    mitchell_lawler
    mitchell_lawler

    A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it.

    A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it. cover
    108
    ZO
    zoe_vi5fn

    Any moat with an opt-out clause for your competitors is just a fence around your own garden.

    CO
    connor_iwn1g

    Worth looking at what previous legal action actually did to Meta rather than reaching for tobacco. The FTC's record five billion dollar privacy fine in 2019 was met with the stock rising, because it came in below fears and removed an open question. GDPR was designed to constrain large platforms and increased their share of the European ad market, because compliance cost fell hardest on small intermediaries. The FTC's antitrust case, the one that could genuinely have broken the company up, was decided in Meta's favour last November. The only thing that ever meaningfully hurt the business was Apple changing a tracking default, and Meta out-spent that too, while the ad-tech firms that could not afford to rebuild disappeared. The pattern is not that Meta survives regulation. It is that regulation keeps costing its smaller competitors more.

    Andrew Legget

    Great earnings season, but are the earnings real?

    Great earnings season, but are the earnings real? cover
    At first glance, this was the strongest earnings season in years. But when you look at where the growth actually came from, the story splits into two very different pictures.
    10
    Advertisement

    Weekly Picks

    LO
    Lou_Basenese
    ONCY logo
    Lou_Basenese on Oncolytics Biotech ·

    The Team Behind a $2 Billion Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) Deal Just Took Over This $105 Million Cancer Biotech

    Fair Value:US$3.575.5% undervalued
    26 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    7 users have liked this narrative
    TR
    tripledub
    Recommended Voice
    META logo
    tripledub on Meta Platforms ·

    The $135 Billion Bet That Should Make Every Shareholder Nervous

    Fair Value:US$5861.4% undervalued
    59 users have followed this narrative
    3 users have commented on this narrative
    34 users have liked this narrative
    TA
    Talos
    Emerging Author
    VOYG logo
    Talos on Voyager Technologies ·

    The "Landlord of Orbit" – A Deep Value Play Ahead of the Starlab Era

    Fair Value:US$385.291.1% undervalued
    62 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    6 users have liked this narrative
    IV
    Emerging Author
    UBER logo
    Ivoed on Uber Technologies ·

    Uber’s Valuation Depends On Who Captures The Economics Of Driverless Rides

    Fair Value:US$11632.1% undervalued
    12 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    3 users have liked this narrative

    Updated Narratives

    RO
    RockeTeller
    SCZ logo
    RockeTeller on Santacruz Silver Mining ·

    Santacruz Silver, 5.6M Oz Silver Producer Trading at Low Multiples, 100X Per-Share Upside in $200 Silver

    Fair Value:CA$142.990.7% undervalued
    96 users have followed this narrative
    14 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    CO
    composite32
    ETN logo
    composite32 on Eaton ·

    "Grid-to-Chip: How Eaton Controls the Physical Bottlenecks of AI Data Centers"

    Fair Value:US$517.0622.1% undervalued
    1 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    QU
    QuanD
    NVDA logo
    QuanD on NVIDIA ·

    Nvidia Isn’t Cisco. And It’s Still Cheap

    Fair Value:US$359.2239.4% undervalued
    1 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative

    Popular Narratives

    OS
    oscargarcia
    NVDA logo
    oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

    The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

    Fair Value:US$28022.3% undervalued
    365 users have followed this narrative
    9 users have commented on this narrative
    16 users have liked this narrative
    CU
    MSFT logo
    CubanEros on Microsoft ·

    A wonderful business at reasonable price.

    Fair Value:US$419.9122.3% overvalued
    213 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    9 users have liked this narrative
    KI
    AMZN logo
    KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

    Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

    Fair Value:US$475.0943.9% undervalued
    240 users have followed this narrative
    1 users have commented on this narrative
    8 users have liked this narrative