What G4S plc's (LON:GFS) ROE Can Tell Us

    Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). We'll use ROE to examine G4S plc (LON:GFS), by way of a worked example.

    Our data shows G4S has a return on equity of 8.1% for the last year. One way to conceptualize this, is that for each £1 of shareholders' equity it has, the company made £0.08 in profit.

    View our latest analysis for G4S

    Advertisement

    How Do I Calculate ROE?

    The formula for ROE is:

    Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

    Or for G4S:

    8.1% = UK£51m ÷ UK£631m (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2019.)

    Most know that net profit is the total earnings after all expenses, but the concept of shareholders' equity is a little more complicated. It is all earnings retained by the company, plus any capital paid in by shareholders. Shareholders' equity can be calculated by subtracting the total liabilities of the company from the total assets of the company.

    What Does ROE Signify?

    Return on Equity measures a company's profitability against the profit it has kept for the business (plus any capital injections). The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. The higher the ROE, the more profit the company is making. So, all else equal, investors should like a high ROE. That means it can be interesting to compare the ROE of different companies.

    Does G4S Have A Good ROE?

    Arguably the easiest way to assess company's ROE is to compare it with the average in its industry. The limitation of this approach is that some companies are quite different from others, even within the same industry classification. The image below shows that G4S has an ROE that is roughly in line with the Commercial Services industry average (9.7%).

    LSE:GFS Past Revenue and Net Income, January 13th 2020
    LSE:GFS Past Revenue and Net Income, January 13th 2020

    That's not overly surprising. ROE can give us a view about company quality, but many investors also look to other factors, such as whether there are insiders buying shares. For those who like to find winning investments this free list of growing companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.

    How Does Debt Impact Return On Equity?

    Companies usually need to invest money to grow their profits. The cash for investment can come from prior year profits (retained earnings), issuing new shares, or borrowing. In the first two cases, the ROE will capture this use of capital to grow. In the latter case, the use of debt will improve the returns, but will not change the equity. In this manner the use of debt will boost ROE, even though the core economics of the business stay the same.

    G4S's Debt And Its 8.1% ROE

    It seems that G4S uses a lot of debt to fund the business, since it has a high debt to equity ratio of 4.35. The combination of an uninspiring ROE and high debt suggests the business isn't very attractive.

    In Summary

    Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. In my book the highest quality companies have high return on equity, despite low debt. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.

    But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. Profit growth rates, versus the expectations reflected in the price of the stock, are a particularly important to consider. So you might want to check this FREE visualization of analyst forecasts for the company.

    Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

    If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.

    We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Thank you for reading.

    M
    mitchell_lawler
    mitchell_lawler

    A lot of companies don't have a moat, they have customers too busy to switch. AI agents could change that.

    139
    L
    LeverageIsLovely

    Meta built an agent that saves you time so you can spend it on Meta.

    s
    sarah_c5otv

    It can only change a little. Adopting AI agents will in itself be a HUGE friction for many.

    Andrew Legget

    Are social media stocks the new Big Tobacco?

    Are social media stocks the new Big Tobacco? cover
    Greater regulatory scrutiny is catching up with digital platforms, posing a rising risk for social media stocks. But as Big Tobacco discovered, that's not always a bad outcome for shareholders.
    14
    Advertisement

    Weekly Picks

    CE
    Ceazar
    SPAI logo
    Ceazar on Sparc AI ·

    When GPS fails: this small cap is fixing a $54B drone problem

    Fair Value:CA$5.2541.1% undervalued
    198 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    30 users have liked this narrative
    CO
    composite32
    Emerging Author
    AROC logo
    composite32 on Archrock ·

    AI Needs Power. Power Needs Gas. Gas Needs Compression: The Archrock Investment Thesis

    Fair Value:US$44.8831.9% undervalued
    17 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    2 users have liked this narrative
    JO
    John_Eric
    Emerging Author
    AEIS logo
    John_Eric on Advanced Energy Industries ·

    AEIS Is Firing on Every Cylinder. My Problem Is the Safety Factor.

    Fair Value:US$567.8655.9% undervalued
    10 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    7 users have liked this narrative
    IS
    LRCX logo
    isidrohg on Lam Research ·

    The Memory Shortage Is Lam's Order Book — Whether It Persists Or Resolves

    Fair Value:US$423.8536.1% undervalued
    13 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    5 users have liked this narrative

    Updated Narratives

    RE
    RedCandleRx
    APP logo
    RedCandleRx on AppLovin ·

    Why the Market Still Misprices AppLovin as Just a Gaming Network

    Fair Value:US$50734.6% undervalued
    1 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    BR
    Brunhilde_Wagner
    CPRT logo
    Brunhilde_Wagner on Copart ·

    Compounder to Cash Generator in Real Time

    Fair Value:US$2524.2% overvalued
    2 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    EV
    CHG logo
    evadav on Chemring Group ·

    Chemring remains a strong long term defence holding

    Fair Value:UK£6.3515.8% undervalued
    1 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative

    Popular Narratives

    AN
    AnalystConsensusTarget
    NVDA logo
    AnalystConsensusTarget on NVIDIA ·

    NVDA: Expanding AI Demand Will Drive Major Data Center Investments Through 2026

    Fair Value:US$302.8329.9% undervalued
    1457 users have followed this narrative
    8 users have commented on this narrative
    35 users have liked this narrative
    AN
    AnalystConsensusTarget
    GOOGL logo
    AnalystConsensusTarget on Alphabet ·

    GOOGL: AI Platform Expansion And Cloud Demand Will Support Durable Performance Amid Competitive Pressures

    Fair Value:US$427.8919.4% undervalued
    1633 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    19 users have liked this narrative
    AN
    AnalystConsensusTarget
    AMZN logo
    AnalystConsensusTarget on Amazon.com ·

    AMZN: Acceleration In Cloud And AI Will Drive Margin Expansion Ahead

    Fair Value:US$32724.0% undervalued
    1645 users have followed this narrative
    1 users have commented on this narrative
    16 users have liked this narrative

    Trending Discussion

    AN
    TPG0 logo
    anthony_x0j2w on Platform Group SE KGaA ·

    Hello,(I am a shareholder).I spent the summer investigating in whatever I was able to find in the press, the trustee, or legal, and comparing it to FS Benner's declaration/transcripts:press: MM has a tendancy to use facts, modify them and turn them the way they want: 100% of their claims against TPG0 is traçable factually, 80% is flawed and interpreted. Example are numerous: 11M loans banks to be paid seems right, but it has not been an issue at all, it has been paid in full. (and it happens all the time in every business...); the previous HR becoming a financial director in the article herself being attacked by TPG on the legal side; the wrong address of curator (if truly announced by TPG).Trustee: according to my research (which can be incomplete) no communication to the Nordic trustee (hereby, bond holders) has been done on a, indebtedness (late payment) > 1M€, which is their obligation by contract (clause 14.d - https://corporate.the-platform-group.com/bond/) => this is a sign of a huge lie and fraud, or the sign that there is no indebtedness > 1M€ over the whole TPG group.Legal: still awaiting for an answer, probable that I won't get it.VALUATIONYou can spent hours working the fundamentals, if they're flawed...the thesis falls.Anyway, I always substracts the badwill (that I consider non-current - you have it in the CFS) & non-controlling interests from my valuation:Earnings ~22MFCF ~40M€The financial statements are not the issue here, we are more on an cheap option on the sincerity of the accounts that a real valuation. Unfortunately, these are unverifiable elements, hence the low price./!\ Careful:the accounts are consolidated and skip the subsidiaries issues...Careful with the business model: TPG0 is a financial holding that acquire subsidiaries, hold the debt, and has no operations. 100% of the Cash Flow comes from subs' dividends => it is a risk here, more a plumber risk than an operational one, but nevertheless...The auditor is too small, and managed by the same firm than before, with 140K€/year commission => it's too low, nobody external really reviewed what Benner and his team are doing internallycapital increase do not go through the CFS, but through change in equity AND equity in the BSIf the equity stays low too long, the WACC increase will be unbearable (I have a 30% global, with a 118% on equity): diluting is expensive => TPG machine can stay broken for a while.Most of the people I talk with never saw this, while this is ESSENTIAL to Benner's business model.SEVERAL EVENTS THAT COULD CHANGE:AEP is being audited by KPMG: if Benner plays the "we will propose KPMG to our shareholders BEOY", this can increase the trust in him significantly/KPMG (or other) to validate the 2026 IFRS accounts & having a word on HGB's: though still consolidated, at least we'll know...AEP being eventually acquired: while it carries a high integration risk due to its size, they talked about it so many times, that trust goes with it.Without this combination of event, the equity is doomed to stay at this level, IMO.Do not forget to also follow the bond: with TPG's announced safe harbor plan for buyback (25% of daily exchange), it is also interesting to check this illiquid and retail market: https://live.deutsche-boerse.com/bond/no0013256834-the-platform-group-ag-8-875-24-28?mic=XFRA

    1
    |
    0