What Does Apple Inc.'s (NASDAQ:AAPL) P/E Ratio Tell You?

The goal of this article is to teach you how to use price to earnings ratios (P/E ratios). To keep it practical, we'll show how Apple Inc.'s (NASDAQ:AAPL) P/E ratio could help you assess the value on offer. Apple has a P/E ratio of 21.88, based on the last twelve months. That is equivalent to an earnings yield of about 4.6%.

Check out our latest analysis for Apple

Advertisement

How Do You Calculate Apple's P/E Ratio?

The formula for price to earnings is:

Price to Earnings Ratio = Price per Share ÷ Earnings per Share (EPS)

Or for Apple:

P/E of 21.88 = $261.78 ÷ $11.97 (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2019.)

Is A High Price-to-Earnings Ratio Good?

A higher P/E ratio means that investors are paying a higher price for each $1 of company earnings. That isn't necessarily good or bad, but a high P/E implies relatively high expectations of what a company can achieve in the future.

How Does Apple's P/E Ratio Compare To Its Peers?

The P/E ratio essentially measures market expectations of a company. You can see in the image below that the average P/E (21.9) for companies in the tech industry is roughly the same as Apple's P/E.

NasdaqGS:AAPL Price Estimation Relative to Market, November 24th 2019
NasdaqGS:AAPL Price Estimation Relative to Market, November 24th 2019

That indicates that the market expects Apple will perform roughly in line with other companies in its industry.

How Growth Rates Impact P/E Ratios

Probably the most important factor in determining what P/E a company trades on is the earnings growth. When earnings grow, the 'E' increases, over time. That means unless the share price increases, the P/E will reduce in a few years. A lower P/E should indicate the stock is cheap relative to others -- and that may attract buyers.

Apple had pretty flat EPS growth in the last year. But EPS is up 13% over the last 5 years. Shareholders have some reason to be optimistic, but the future is always uncertain. So investors should delve deeper. I like to check if company insiders have been buying or selling.

Remember: P/E Ratios Don't Consider The Balance Sheet

It's important to note that the P/E ratio considers the market capitalization, not the enterprise value. So it won't reflect the advantage of cash, or disadvantage of debt. Hypothetically, a company could reduce its future P/E ratio by spending its cash (or taking on debt) to achieve higher earnings.

While growth expenditure doesn't always pay off, the point is that it is a good option to have; but one that the P/E ratio ignores.

How Does Apple's Debt Impact Its P/E Ratio?

Apple's net debt is 0.6% of its market cap. So it doesn't have as many options as it would with net cash, but its debt would not have much of an impact on its P/E ratio.

The Bottom Line On Apple's P/E Ratio

Apple trades on a P/E ratio of 21.9, which is above its market average of 18.1. With some debt but no EPS growth last year, the market has high expectations of future profits.

When the market is wrong about a stock, it gives savvy investors an opportunity. People often underestimate remarkable growth -- so investors can make money when fast growth is not fully appreciated. So this free visualization of the analyst consensus on future earnings could help you make the right decision about whether to buy, sell, or hold.

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking at a few good candidates. So take a peek at this free list of companies with modest (or no) debt, trading on a P/E below 20.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Thank you for reading.

mitchell_lawler

Micron (MU) is booming, and it still doesn't look ‘expensive’ based on next year's earnings. So why does our own valuation say it could be worth 40% less?

1710
zoe_vi5fn

A low price to earnings ratio at the top of the cycle is a warning rather than a bargain, and a terrifyingly high one at the bottom is often the entry point

darius_xnnrd

Memory used to have a dozen participants racing each other into oversupply, and now it has three. High bandwidth memory is qualified into customer designs years ahead, sold under long-term agreements, and is far harder to switch away from than commodity DRAM.

About NasdaqGS:AAPL

Apple

Designs, manufactures, and markets smartphones, personal computers, tablets, wearables, and accessories worldwide.

Outstanding track record with excellent balance sheet.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

RI
Rick_Orford
FJET logo
Rick_Orford on Starfighters Space ·

The 1960s Fighter Jet That Could Crack Open a $20 Billion Satellite Market

Fair Value:US$515.2% undervalued
31 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
5 users have liked this narrative
FU
FundamentalFlow
VRT logo
FundamentalFlow on Vertiv Holdings Co ·

The Short and Long Term Compounder of Liquid Cooling industry.

Fair Value:US$45034.7% undervalued
59 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
13 users have liked this narrative
JO
John_Eric
SPXC logo
John_Eric on SPX Technologies ·

I Fell in Love With a Data-Center Cooling Stock. Then I Opened the Filings.

Fair Value:US$2037.1% overvalued
23 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
7 users have liked this narrative
TR
tripledub
GQG logo
tripledub on GQG Partners ·

The Cheap Genius Problem

Fair Value:AU$3.2155.0% undervalued
34 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
22 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

RI
NVO logo
ricksilva20 on Novo Nordisk ·

Fair Price 80$ eventually 100$ depending on the market share futuro

Fair Value:US$76.6340.1% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
IV
META logo
Ivoed on Meta Platforms ·

Meta’s Valuation Still Works, But Only If Free Cash Flow Recovers

Fair Value:US$752.0721.6% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
IV
TRIO logo
Ivoed on Triodos Bank ·

Triodos Bank: The Market Still Looks Stuck On The Trading Saga, But The Valuation Case Is Starting To Shift

Fair Value:€5534.4% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

OS
oscargarcia
NVDA logo
oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

Fair Value:US$28019.6% undervalued
311 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
CU
MSFT logo
CubanEros on Microsoft ·

A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Fair Value:US$419.9118.0% overvalued
169 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative
KI
AMZN logo
KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

Fair Value:US$475.0944.7% undervalued
191 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative