These 4 Measures Indicate That Alaska Communications Systems Group (NASDAQ:ALSK) Is Using Debt In A Risky Way

    The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We can see that Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:ALSK) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

    Advertisement

    Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

    Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

    View our latest analysis for Alaska Communications Systems Group

    What Is Alaska Communications Systems Group's Debt?

    As you can see below, Alaska Communications Systems Group had US$175.3m of debt, at June 2019, which is about the same the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, it also had US$24.1m in cash, and so its net debt is US$151.2m.

    NasdaqGS:ALSK Historical Debt, September 16th 2019
    NasdaqGS:ALSK Historical Debt, September 16th 2019

    A Look At Alaska Communications Systems Group's Liabilities

    According to the last reported balance sheet, Alaska Communications Systems Group had liabilities of US$49.1m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$320.6m due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had US$24.1m in cash and US$27.6m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$318.0m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

    This deficit casts a shadow over the US$93.1m company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we definitely think shareholders need to watch this one closely. At the end of the day, Alaska Communications Systems Group would probably need a major re-capitalization if its creditors were to demand repayment.

    We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

    While we wouldn't worry about Alaska Communications Systems Group's net debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.8, we think its super-low interest cover of 1.6 times is a sign of high leverage. It seems that the business incurs large depreciation and amortisation charges, so maybe its debt load is heavier than it would first appear, since EBITDA is arguably a generous measure of earnings. It seems clear that the cost of borrowing money is negatively impacting returns for shareholders, of late. Investors should also be troubled by the fact that Alaska Communications Systems Group saw its EBIT drop by 13% over the last twelve months. If things keep going like that, handling the debt will about as easy as bundling an angry house cat into its travel box. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is Alaska Communications Systems Group's earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.

    But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. In the last three years, Alaska Communications Systems Group's free cash flow amounted to 32% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.

    Our View

    To be frank both Alaska Communications Systems Group's interest cover and its track record of staying on top of its total liabilities make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. Having said that, its ability handle its debt, based on its EBITDA, isn't such a worry. After considering the datapoints discussed, we think Alaska Communications Systems Group has too much debt. While some investors love that sort of risky play, it's certainly not our cup of tea. Given the risks around Alaska Communications Systems Group's use of debt, the sensible thing to do is to check if insiders have been unloading the stock.

    When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

    We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

    If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.

    MI
    mitchell_lawler
    mitchell_lawler

    Gold miners still look inexpensive because the market thinks we're near the top of the cycle. Given what's happening to the dollar, I'm not so sure.

    Gold miners still look inexpensive because the market thinks we're near the top of the cycle. Given what's happening to the dollar, I'm not so sure. cover
    1311
    ST
    steve_investor

    Is it a safer bet on gold to have just exposure to ETFs?

    MA
    marcus_l38oa

    Between 2003 and 2011, gold nearly went 5x. Dollar went weak too. The gold companies did bad. It is worth noting that between 2003 and 2011, there was 2008! I will leave it your inference and research.

    Advertisement

    Weekly Picks

    RI
    Rick_Orford
    FJET logo
    Rick_Orford on Starfighters Space ·

    The 1960s Fighter Jet That Could Crack Open a $20 Billion Satellite Market

    Fair Value:US$522.0% undervalued
    58 users have followed this narrative
    3 users have commented on this narrative
    7 users have liked this narrative
    JO
    John_Eric
    MELI logo
    John_Eric on MercadoLibre ·

    MercadoLibre and the Spreadsheet Trick That Decides Everything

    Fair Value:US$7.31k73.7% undervalued
    108 users have followed this narrative
    2 users have commented on this narrative
    16 users have liked this narrative
    RC
    PYPL logo
    rcb9 on PayPal Holdings ·

    Ten Percent More Volume, One Percent More Transaction Margin

    Fair Value:US$70.8913.2% undervalued
    15 users have followed this narrative
    1 users have commented on this narrative
    6 users have liked this narrative
    HE
    HedgeY
    MU logo
    HedgeY on Micron Technology ·

    Micron - The Memory Bottleneck Behind the AI Supercycle

    Fair Value:US$1.25k22.7% undervalued
    41 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    13 users have liked this narrative

    Updated Narratives

    VI
    VIJITH_PREMASINGHE
    PAP.N0000 logo
    VIJITH_PREMASINGHE on Panasian Power ·

    Panasian Power Will Transform with 35% Profit Margin Growth and 18% Revenue Boost

    Fair Value:LK₨14.836.5% overvalued
    1 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    PI
    PittTheYounger
    NESTE logo
    PittTheYounger on Neste Oyj ·

    Long-overlooked renewable fuels champion starts to get attention it deserves

    Fair Value:€48.6832.5% undervalued
    1 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    LU
    LunaRodas
    BJ logo
    LunaRodas on BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings ·

    BJ | BJ's Wholesale Club: What They Said vs. What They Did

    Fair Value:US$108.2210.9% undervalued
    1 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative

    Popular Narratives

    OS
    oscargarcia
    NVDA logo
    oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

    The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

    Fair Value:US$28023.3% undervalued
    341 users have followed this narrative
    9 users have commented on this narrative
    16 users have liked this narrative
    CU
    MSFT logo
    CubanEros on Microsoft ·

    A wonderful business at reasonable price.

    Fair Value:US$419.9115.1% overvalued
    188 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    9 users have liked this narrative
    KI
    AMZN logo
    KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

    Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

    Fair Value:US$475.0945.6% undervalued
    216 users have followed this narrative
    1 users have commented on this narrative
    8 users have liked this narrative

    Trending Discussion

    HA
    HarishPK
    EVER logo
    HarishPK on EverQuote ·

    Feedback welcome!

    2
    |
    0
    MA
    MRNA logo
    Madave on Moderna ·

    Aged like wine

    2
    |
    0