Should Creepy Jar S.A.’s (WSE:CRJ) Weak Investment Returns Worry You?

Today we are going to look at Creepy Jar S.A. (WSE:CRJ) to see whether it might be an attractive investment prospect. Specifically, we'll consider its Return On Capital Employed (ROCE), since that will give us an insight into how efficiently the business can generate profits from the capital it requires.

Firstly, we'll go over how we calculate ROCE. Second, we'll look at its ROCE compared to similar companies. Last but not least, we'll look at what impact its current liabilities have on its ROCE.

Advertisement

What is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?

ROCE measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. All else being equal, a better business will have a higher ROCE. Ultimately, it is a useful but imperfect metric. Renowned investment researcher Michael Mauboussin has suggested that a high ROCE can indicate that 'one dollar invested in the company generates value of more than one dollar'.

So, How Do We Calculate ROCE?

Analysts use this formula to calculate return on capital employed:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

Or for Creepy Jar:

0.12 = zł890k ÷ (zł7.7m - zł283k) (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2019.)

So, Creepy Jar has an ROCE of 12%.

Check out our latest analysis for Creepy Jar

Does Creepy Jar Have A Good ROCE?

When making comparisons between similar businesses, investors may find ROCE useful. In this analysis, Creepy Jar's ROCE appears meaningfully below the 17% average reported by the Entertainment industry. This could be seen as a negative, as it suggests some competitors may be employing their capital more efficiently. Separate from Creepy Jar's performance relative to its industry, its ROCE in absolute terms looks satisfactory, and it may be worth researching in more depth.

The image below shows how Creepy Jar's ROCE compares to its industry, and you can click it to see more detail on its past growth.

WSE:CRJ Past Revenue and Net Income April 8th 2020
WSE:CRJ Past Revenue and Net Income April 8th 2020

It is important to remember that ROCE shows past performance, and is not necessarily predictive. ROCE can be misleading for companies in cyclical industries, with returns looking impressive during the boom times, but very weak during the busts. ROCE is only a point-in-time measure. How cyclical is Creepy Jar? You can see for yourself by looking at this free graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

How Creepy Jar's Current Liabilities Impact Its ROCE

Short term (or current) liabilities, are things like supplier invoices, overdrafts, or tax bills that need to be paid within 12 months. Due to the way the ROCE equation works, having large bills due in the near term can make it look as though a company has less capital employed, and thus a higher ROCE than usual. To check the impact of this, we calculate if a company has high current liabilities relative to its total assets.

Creepy Jar has total assets of zł7.7m and current liabilities of zł283k. As a result, its current liabilities are equal to approximately 3.7% of its total assets. Low current liabilities have only a minimal impact on Creepy Jar's ROCE, making its decent returns more credible.

The Bottom Line On Creepy Jar's ROCE

If Creepy Jar can continue reinvesting in its business, it could be an attractive prospect. There might be better investments than Creepy Jar out there, but you will have to work hard to find them . These promising businesses with rapidly growing earnings might be right up your alley.

For those who like to find winning investments this free list of growing companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Thank you for reading.

MI
mitchell_lawler
mitchell_lawler

Google (GOOG) just paid US$10 million for a dead airline's emails. I think some companies are sitting on undervalued data goldmines, just waiting to strike a deal. But which can monetize it without going broke?

1110
PO
PowerLaw

Reddit is re-evaluating it's play here. It is worth watching. The consumers of data can also become competitors. It's a much bigger threat.

JA
jake_vw4g3

It only matters to a business if it can become a recurrent revenue stream. Mostly one off sales don't go anywhere.

About WSE:CRJ

Creepy Jar

Develops and publishes computer games in Poland and internationally.

Flawless balance sheet with proven track record.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

RI
Rick_Orford
FJET logo
Rick_Orford on Starfighters Space ·

The 1960s Fighter Jet That Could Crack Open a $20 Billion Satellite Market

Fair Value:US$520.6% undervalued
51 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
7 users have liked this narrative
JO
John_Eric
MELI logo
John_Eric on MercadoLibre ·

MercadoLibre and the Spreadsheet Trick That Decides Everything

Fair Value:US$7.31k73.9% undervalued
93 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
14 users have liked this narrative
RC
PYPL logo
rcb9 on PayPal Holdings ·

Ten Percent More Volume, One Percent More Transaction Margin

Fair Value:US$70.8913.6% undervalued
12 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
5 users have liked this narrative
HE
HedgeY
MU logo
HedgeY on Micron Technology ·

Micron - The Memory Bottleneck Behind the AI Supercycle

Fair Value:US$1.25k25.0% undervalued
30 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

JO
John_Eric
BWMX logo
John_Eric on Betterware de MéxicoP.I. de ·

Only Two Analysts Cover This Stock.

Fair Value:US$59.672.9% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
LU
LunaRodas
JKHY logo
LunaRodas on Jack Henry & Associates ·

JKHY | Jack Henry: What They Said vs. What They Did

Fair Value:US$163.690.4% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
DA
LOT logo
david_1211213 on Lotus Technology ·

When History and Modern Collide, The Possibilities Expand for Lotus Technology Inc. (LOT)

Fair Value:US$4.576.9% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

OS
oscargarcia
NVDA logo
oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

Fair Value:US$28022.3% undervalued
327 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
CU
MSFT logo
CubanEros on Microsoft ·

A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Fair Value:US$419.9115.3% overvalued
182 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative
KI
AMZN logo
KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

Fair Value:US$475.0944.0% undervalued
206 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative