Is GenMark Diagnostics (NASDAQ:GNMK) Using Too Much Debt?

    Want to participate in a short research study? Help shape the future of investing tools and you could win a $250 gift card!

    Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. As with many other companies. GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. (NASDAQ:GNMK) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

    Advertisement

    What Risk Does Debt Bring?

    Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

    View our latest analysis for GenMark Diagnostics

    How Much Debt Does GenMark Diagnostics Carry?

    The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at March 2019 GenMark Diagnostics had debt of US$47.8m, up from US$28.3m in one year. However, its balance sheet shows it holds US$48.4m in cash, so it actually has US$601.0k net cash.

    NasdaqGM:GNMK Historical Debt, July 16th 2019
    NasdaqGM:GNMK Historical Debt, July 16th 2019

    A Look At GenMark Diagnostics's Liabilities

    According to the last reported balance sheet, GenMark Diagnostics had liabilities of US$17.7m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$54.5m due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had US$48.4m in cash and US$9.17m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$14.6m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

    Given GenMark Diagnostics has a market capitalization of US$361.0m, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward. GenMark Diagnostics boasts net cash, so it's fair to say it does not have a heavy debt load! There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine GenMark Diagnostics's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

    In the last year GenMark Diagnostics managed to grow its revenue by 18%, to US$72m. We usually like to see faster growth from unprofitable companies, but each to their own.

    So How Risky Is GenMark Diagnostics?

    Statistically speaking companies that lose money are riskier than those that make money. And in the last year GenMark Diagnostics had negative earnings before interest and tax (EBIT), truth be told. Indeed, in that time it burnt through US$37m of cash and made a loss of US$51m. However, it has net cash of US$48m, so it has a bit of time before it will need more capital. Overall, we'd say the stock is a bit risky, and we're usually very cautious until we see positive free cash flow. For riskier companies like GenMark Diagnostics I always like to keep an eye on whether insiders are buying or selling. So click here if you want to find out for yourself.

    If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

    We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

    If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.

    MI
    mitchell_lawler
    mitchell_lawler

    A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it.

    A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it. cover
    108
    ZO
    zoe_vi5fn

    Any moat with an opt-out clause for your competitors is just a fence around your own garden.

    CO
    connor_iwn1g

    Worth looking at what previous legal action actually did to Meta rather than reaching for tobacco. The FTC's record five billion dollar privacy fine in 2019 was met with the stock rising, because it came in below fears and removed an open question. GDPR was designed to constrain large platforms and increased their share of the European ad market, because compliance cost fell hardest on small intermediaries. The FTC's antitrust case, the one that could genuinely have broken the company up, was decided in Meta's favour last November. The only thing that ever meaningfully hurt the business was Apple changing a tracking default, and Meta out-spent that too, while the ad-tech firms that could not afford to rebuild disappeared. The pattern is not that Meta survives regulation. It is that regulation keeps costing its smaller competitors more.

    Andrew Legget

    Great earnings season, but are the earnings real?

    Great earnings season, but are the earnings real? cover
    At first glance, this was the strongest earnings season in years. But when you look at where the growth actually came from, the story splits into two very different pictures.
    10
    Advertisement

    Weekly Picks

    LO
    Lou_Basenese
    ONCY logo
    Lou_Basenese on Oncolytics Biotech ·

    The Team Behind a $2 Billion Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) Deal Just Took Over This $105 Million Cancer Biotech

    Fair Value:US$3.575.5% undervalued
    26 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    7 users have liked this narrative
    TR
    tripledub
    Recommended Voice
    META logo
    tripledub on Meta Platforms ·

    The $135 Billion Bet That Should Make Every Shareholder Nervous

    Fair Value:US$5861.4% undervalued
    59 users have followed this narrative
    3 users have commented on this narrative
    34 users have liked this narrative
    TA
    Talos
    Emerging Author
    VOYG logo
    Talos on Voyager Technologies ·

    The "Landlord of Orbit" – A Deep Value Play Ahead of the Starlab Era

    Fair Value:US$385.291.1% undervalued
    62 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    6 users have liked this narrative
    IV
    Emerging Author
    UBER logo
    Ivoed on Uber Technologies ·

    Uber’s Valuation Depends On Who Captures The Economics Of Driverless Rides

    Fair Value:US$11632.1% undervalued
    12 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    3 users have liked this narrative

    Updated Narratives

    RO
    RockeTeller
    SCZ logo
    RockeTeller on Santacruz Silver Mining ·

    Santacruz Silver, 5.6M Oz Silver Producer Trading at Low Multiples, 100X Per-Share Upside in $200 Silver

    Fair Value:CA$142.990.7% undervalued
    96 users have followed this narrative
    14 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    CO
    composite32
    ETN logo
    composite32 on Eaton ·

    "Grid-to-Chip: How Eaton Controls the Physical Bottlenecks of AI Data Centers"

    Fair Value:US$517.0622.1% undervalued
    1 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    QU
    QuanD
    NVDA logo
    QuanD on NVIDIA ·

    Nvidia Isn’t Cisco. And It’s Still Cheap

    Fair Value:US$359.2239.4% undervalued
    1 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative

    Popular Narratives

    OS
    oscargarcia
    NVDA logo
    oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

    The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

    Fair Value:US$28022.3% undervalued
    365 users have followed this narrative
    9 users have commented on this narrative
    16 users have liked this narrative
    CU
    MSFT logo
    CubanEros on Microsoft ·

    A wonderful business at reasonable price.

    Fair Value:US$419.9122.3% overvalued
    213 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    9 users have liked this narrative
    KI
    AMZN logo
    KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

    Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

    Fair Value:US$475.0943.9% undervalued
    240 users have followed this narrative
    1 users have commented on this narrative
    8 users have liked this narrative