How Much is P.A.M. Transportation Services, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:PTSI) CEO Getting Paid?

In 2009, Daniel Cushman was appointed CEO of P.A.M. Transportation Services, Inc. (NASDAQ:PTSI). This report will, first, examine the CEO compensation levels in comparison to CEO compensation at companies of similar size. Then we'll look at a snap shot of the business growth. And finally - as a second measure of performance - we will look at the returns shareholders have received over the last few years. The aim of all this is to consider the appropriateness of CEO pay levels.

View our latest analysis for P.A.M. Transportation Services

Advertisement

How Does Daniel Cushman's Compensation Compare With Similar Sized Companies?

Our data indicates that P.A.M. Transportation Services, Inc. is worth US$212m, and total annual CEO compensation was reported as US$1.2m for the year to December 2019. That's actually a decrease on the year before. While we always look at total compensation first, we note that the salary component is less, at US$628k. We examined companies with market caps from US$100m to US$400m, and discovered that the median CEO total compensation of that group was US$1.4m.

Now let's take a look at the pay mix on an industry and company level to gain a better understanding of where P.A.M. Transportation Services stands. Talking in terms of the sector, salary represented approximately 19% of total compensation out of all the companies we analysed, while other remuneration made up 81% of the pie. It's interesting to note that P.A.M. Transportation Services pays out a greater portion of remuneration through salary, in comparison to the wider industry.

So Daniel Cushman is paid around the average of the companies we looked at. While this data point isn't particularly informative alone, it gains more meaning when considered with business performance. The graphic below shows how CEO compensation at P.A.M. Transportation Services has changed from year to year.

NasdaqGM:PTSI CEO Compensation May 4th 2020
NasdaqGM:PTSI CEO Compensation May 4th 2020

Is P.A.M. Transportation Services, Inc. Growing?

Over the last three years P.A.M. Transportation Services, Inc. has shrunk its earnings per share by an average of 2.4% per year (measured with a line of best fit). Its revenue is down 5.1% over last year.

In the last three years the company has failed to grow earnings per share. And the fact that revenue is down year on year arguably paints an ugly picture. These factors suggest that the business performance wouldn't really justify a high pay packet for the CEO. Shareholders might be interested in this free visualization of analyst forecasts.

Has P.A.M. Transportation Services, Inc. Been A Good Investment?

I think that the total shareholder return of 121%, over three years, would leave most P.A.M. Transportation Services, Inc. shareholders smiling. This strong performance might mean some shareholders don't mind if the CEO were to be paid more than is normal for a company of its size.

In Summary...

Remuneration for Daniel Cushman is close enough to the median pay for a CEO of a similar sized company .

We feel that earnings per share have been a bit disappointing, but it's nice to see positive shareholder returns over the last three years. So we doubt many are complaining about the fairly normal CEO pay. Shifting gears from CEO pay for a second, we've picked out 1 warning sign for P.A.M. Transportation Services that investors should be aware of in a dynamic business environment.

Arguably, business quality is much more important than CEO compensation levels. So check out this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Thank you for reading.

About NasdaqGM:PAMT

PAMT

Through its subsidiaries, operates as a truckload transportation and logistics company in the United States, Mexico, and Canada.

Slightly overvalued with very low risk.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

DA
davidlsander
OPTH logo
davidlsander on Optimi Health ·

OPTH: A licensed manufacturer already selling MDMA while peers still wait on trials

Fair Value:US$1261.0% undervalued
15 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
2 users have liked this narrative
FU
VRT logo
FundamentalFlow on Vertiv Holdings Co ·

The Short and Long Term Compounder of Liquid Cooling industry.

Fair Value:US$45037.4% undervalued
9 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
4 users have liked this narrative
JO
John_Eric
SPXC logo
John_Eric on SPX Technologies ·

I Fell in Love With a Data-Center Cooling Stock. Then I Opened the Filings.

Fair Value:US$2036.8% overvalued
6 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
3 users have liked this narrative
TR
tripledub
GQG logo
tripledub on GQG Partners ·

The Cheap Genius Problem

Fair Value:AU$2.4541.2% undervalued
16 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
18 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

RC
PLTR logo
rcb9 on Palantir Technologies ·

The Fifty-Five Percent Margin Is A Tax Holiday, Not The Business

Fair Value:US$91.8590.5% overvalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
KL
TAL logo
Klim on PetroTal ·

PetroTal: Betting On a Production Recovery

Fair Value:CA$0.8542.4% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
DA
AIIO logo
david_1211213 on Robo.ai ·

Robo.ai (AIIO): A Long-Term Bullish Technical Setup

Fair Value:US$5.6447.2% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

OS
oscargarcia
NVDA logo
oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

Fair Value:US$28022.3% undervalued
296 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
CU
MSFT logo
CubanEros on Microsoft ·

A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Fair Value:US$419.9120.0% overvalued
158 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative
KI
AMZN logo
KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

Fair Value:US$475.0942.7% undervalued
178 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

M0
PONY logo
m00sekateer on Pony AI ·

Checked it. The arithmetic is fine; the inputs aren't, and the conclusion doesn't follow even if they were.1. Fare. $7 is a US robotaxi price. Pony's record peak day in Shenzhen (22 March 2026) was RMB394 net revenue per Gen-7 vehicle on 25 orders — about US$2.20 per order. You're roughly 3x high.2. Utilisation. 25 orders/day is Pony's all-time single-day high, not an average, and you then run it 365 days with zero downtime for charging, cleaning, maintenance, weather or geofence interruption.Corrected, the best day Pony has ever recorded yields ~US$55/day. On $43k of hardware that's ~26 months of gross revenue, before any operating cost. The reported actuals agree: FY2025 robotaxi services revenue US$16.6m on a fleet just past 1,000 units; Q1 2026 US$8.6m with the fleet above 1,700 — call it US$20–25k per vehicle per year against your $63,875.3. The caveat is the whole argument. You flag "not including operational costs (people costs)" and then set it aside. Remote safety operators, platform commissions, charging, insurance, cleaning, depot and maintenance are what determine whether a robotaxi contributes anything at all.4. Payback isn't profitability. Q1 2026: 16.2% gross margin on US$34.3m revenue, US$63.9m of opex, US$53.5m net loss. Marginal hardware payback says nothing about R&D, mapping, licensing or overhead.5. Falling BOM cuts both ways. Pony targets sub-RMB230k (~US$34k) total vehicle cost for 2027. Great for new units, bad for the residual value of fleets already deployed on a five-year depreciation schedule.What you get right: the cost trajectory is real, and city-wide UE breakeven in Guangzhou (Nov 2025) and Shenzhen (Feb 2026) is a genuine milestone. But that is contribution-margin breakeven per trip — not "cracked the per-unit cost," and not an 8-month payback. Your post predates all of it; the data has since landed, and it's less favourable on revenue per vehicle than the model assumed.

0
|
0