- Canada
- /
- Communications
- /
- TSXV:IMI
How Lite Access Technologies Inc. (CVE:LTE) Can Impact Your Portfolio Volatility
Anyone researching Lite Access Technologies Inc. (CVE:LTE) might want to consider the historical volatility of the share price. Modern finance theory considers volatility to be a measure of risk, and there are two main types of price volatility. The first type is company specific volatility. Investors use diversification across uncorrelated stocks to reduce this kind of price volatility across the portfolio. The second sort is caused by the natural volatility of markets, overall. For example, certain macroeconomic events will impact (virtually) all stocks on the market.
Some stocks are more sensitive to general market forces than others. Beta is a widely used metric to measure a stock's exposure to market risk (volatility). Before we go on, it's worth noting that Warren Buffett pointed out in his 2014 letter to shareholders that 'volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' Having said that, beta can still be rather useful. The first thing to understand about beta is that the beta of the overall market is one. Any stock with a beta of greater than one is considered more volatile than the market, while those with a beta below one are either less volatile or poorly correlated with the market.
View our latest analysis for Lite Access Technologies
What LTE's beta value tells investors
Given that it has a beta of 0.80, we can surmise that the Lite Access Technologies share price has not been strongly impacted by broader market volatility (over the last 5 years). This suggests that including it in your portfolio will reduce volatility arising from broader market movements, assuming your portfolio's weighted average beta is higher than 0.80. Share price volatility is well worth considering, but most long term investors consider the history of revenue and earnings growth to be more important. Take a look at how Lite Access Technologies fares in that regard, below.
Could LTE's size cause it to be more volatile?
Lite Access Technologies is a rather small company. It has a market capitalisation of CA$8.5m, which means it is probably under the radar of most investors. Very small companies often have a low beta value because their share prices are not well correlated with market volatility. This could be because the price is reacting to company specific events. Alternatively, the shares may not be actively traded.
What this means for you:
The Lite Access Technologies doesn't usually show much sensitivity to the broader market. This could be for a variety of reasons. Typically, smaller companies have a low beta if their share price tends to move a lot due to company specific developments. Alternatively, an strong dividend payer might move less than the market because investors are valuing it for its income stream. This article aims to educate investors about beta values, but it's well worth looking at important company-specific fundamentals such as Lite Access Technologies’s financial health and performance track record. I highly recommend you dive deeper by considering the following:
- Financial Health: Are LTE’s operations financially sustainable? Balance sheets can be hard to analyze, which is why we’ve done it for you. Check out our financial health checks here.
- Past Track Record: Has LTE been consistently performing well irrespective of the ups and downs in the market? Go into more detail in the past performance analysis and take a look at the free visual representations of LTE's historicals for more clarity.
- Other High-Performing Stocks: Are there other stocks that provide better prospects with proven track records? Explore our free list of these great stocks here.
We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.
If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.
About TSXV:IMI
Ironman International
Offers fiber optic products and advanced installation methodologies in Canada and the United States.
Slight risk with imperfect balance sheet.
Market Insights
Weekly Picks

Looking to be second time lucky with a game-changing new product
PlaySide Studios: Market Is Sleeping on a Potential 10M+ Unit Breakout Year, FY26 Could Be the Rerate of the Decade

Inotiv NAMs Test Center
This isn’t speculation — this is confirmation.A Schedule 13G was filed, not a 13D, meaning this is passive institutional capital, not acti
Recently Updated Narratives

Perion (PERI) Q4 Earnings: Real AI Turnaround… or Just Another Adtech Hype Cycle? 🤔📊
TSMC will drive future growth with CoWoS packaging and N2 rollout

Beyond 2026, Beyond a Double
Popular Narratives

Is Ubisoft the Market’s Biggest Pricing Error? Why Forensic Value Points to €33 Per Share

Analyst Commentary Highlights Microsoft AI Momentum and Upward Valuation Amid Growth and Competitive Risks

NVDA: Expanding AI Demand Will Drive Major Data Center Investments Through 2026
Trending Discussion
Looks interesting, I am jumping into the finances now. Your 15% margin seems high for a conservative model, can't just ignore the years they need to invest. You didnt seem to mention that they had to dilute the sharebase by issuing ~40mil shares. raising ~8 mil. should be enough if mouse does OK. If not they will need to raise more to suvive. Losing 20m a year, 14m after there 6m cutbacks. Am I reading it right that they have no debt. have they any history of raising debt? First look it is too dependant on the mouse and GoT games. they do well stock will 2-3x, poorly and it will drop. I am not sure I agree with your work for hire backstop. Unlikely meta horizons will continue with the same size contract going forward. say 10% margins and 15x multiple on 30m. that is 45m, which with the new sharecount is 10c. It is a backstop but maybe not that strong. Mouse fails and devs could start jumping ship and outside contracts could dry up. Hmm on top of all that AI could be disrupting the work for hire model. I think I have mostly talked myself out of it. Although Mouse looks good and does seem like the type of game that could go viral on twitch for a few months. If it does you will likly get a great return 5x plus. crap maybe I am talking myself back in.
