Fortune Brands Home & Security (NYSE:FBHS) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. Importantly, Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc. (NYSE:FBHS) does carry debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

Advertisement

When Is Debt A Problem?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

See our latest analysis for Fortune Brands Home & Security

What Is Fortune Brands Home & Security's Net Debt?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at September 2019 Fortune Brands Home & Security had debt of US$2.35b, up from US$2.5k in one year. However, it does have US$336.2m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$2.01b.

NYSE:FBHS Historical Debt, January 22nd 2020
NYSE:FBHS Historical Debt, January 22nd 2020

A Look At Fortune Brands Home & Security's Liabilities

According to the last reported balance sheet, Fortune Brands Home & Security had liabilities of US$1.38b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$2.57b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$336.2m as well as receivables valued at US$640.1m due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$2.97b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

Fortune Brands Home & Security has a market capitalization of US$9.73b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

Fortune Brands Home & Security's net debt of 2.3 times EBITDA suggests graceful use of debt. And the alluring interest cover (EBIT of 7.8 times interest expense) certainly does not do anything to dispel this impression. Fortune Brands Home & Security grew its EBIT by 6.4% in the last year. That's far from incredible but it is a good thing, when it comes to paying off debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Fortune Brands Home & Security can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. During the last three years, Fortune Brands Home & Security produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 65% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.

Our View

Fortune Brands Home & Security's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow was a real positive on this analysis, as was its interest cover. On the other hand, its net debt to EBITDA makes us a little less comfortable about its debt. When we consider all the elements mentioned above, it seems to us that Fortune Brands Home & Security is managing its debt quite well. Having said that, the load is sufficiently heavy that we would recommend any shareholders keep a close eye on it. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Fortune Brands Home & Security that you should be aware of before investing here.

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Thank you for reading.

About NYSE:FBIN

Fortune Brands Innovations

Provides home, security, and digital products for residential home repair, remodeling, new construction, and security applications in the United States and internationally.

Good value average dividend payer.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

CE
Ceazar
SPAI logo
Ceazar on Sparc AI ·

When GPS fails: this small cap is fixing a $54B drone problem

Fair Value:CA$5.2542.1% undervalued
70 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
17 users have liked this narrative
HE
HedgeY
IONQ logo
HedgeY on IonQ ·

The Best-Funded Quantum Platform and Still a Stock Priced for Perfection

Fair Value:US$482.3% overvalued
29 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
7 users have liked this narrative
BL
BlackGoat
CBRS logo
BlackGoat on Cerebras Systems ·

The Wafer Giant Threatening NVIDIA's GPU Hegemony

Fair Value:US$415.5450.7% undervalued
50 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
7 users have liked this narrative
IV
NFLX logo
Ivoed on Netflix ·

Netflix’s Business Quality Is Clear. The Harder Question Is Whether The Stock Is Still Cheap

Fair Value:US$825.3% undervalued
26 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

IN
LUCK logo
inimosini on Lucky Cement ·

Discounted Cash Flow Valuation of Lucky Cement Limited (LUCK)

Fair Value:PK₨511.86.2% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
PR
PYPL logo
Premium_Bobcat_cwey on PayPal Holdings ·

PayPal: PayPal Doesn't Need to Grow – It Needs to Stop Falling – A Mispriced Cash Machine With a Cannibal Buyback

Fair Value:US$6530.0% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
WO
woodworthfund
SPCX logo
woodworthfund on Space Exploration Technologies ·

WHY YOU SHOULD NOT BUY THE SPACEX IPO

Fair Value:US$50224.0% overvalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

IN
Investingwilly
MA logo
Investingwilly on Mastercard ·

Mastercard: The Best Dividend Stock You're Ignoring

Fair Value:US$75028.1% undervalued
80 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative
HA
HarishPK
ADBE logo
HarishPK on Adobe ·

Adobe: A Probabilistic Case for Undervaluation

Fair Value:US$319.9631.3% undervalued
63 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
19 users have liked this narrative
NI
niteco
AVGO logo
niteco on Broadcom ·

A Capital Allocation Favorite with Structural Importance

Fair Value:US$651.0544.6% undervalued
54 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
12 users have liked this narrative