Stock Analysis

Does Appia Energy Corp's (CNSX:API) CEO Salary Compare Well With Others?

CNSX:API
Source: Shutterstock
Tom Drivas took the helm as Appia Energy Corp's (CNSX:API) CEO and grew market cap to CA$9.42m recently. Understanding how CEOs are incentivised to run and grow their company is an important aspect of investing in a stock. This is because, if incentives are aligned, more value is created for shareholders which directly impacts your returns as an investor. Today we will assess Drivas’s pay and compare this to the company’s performance over the same period, as well as measure it against other Canadian CEOs leading companies of similar size and profitability. Check out our latest analysis for Appia Energy
Advertisement

What has been the trend in API's earnings?

Performance can be measured based on factors such as earnings and total shareholder return (TSR). I believe earnings is a cleaner proxy, since many factors can impact share price, and therefore, TSR. In the past year, API produced negative earnings of -CA$966.35k . But this is an improvement on prior year’s loss of -CA$1.43m, which may signal a turnaround since API has been loss-making for the past five years, on average, with an EPS of -CA$0.016. As profits are moving up and up, CEO pay should represent Drivas's hard work. During this period Drivas's total compensation remained stable at CA$60.00k since the previous year.
CNSX:API Past Future Earnings July 5th 18
CNSX:API Past Future Earnings July 5th 18

Is API's CEO overpaid relative to the market?

Though one size does not fit all, since compensation should account for specific factors of the company and market, we can determine a high-level benchmark to see if API is an outlier. This outcome can help direct shareholders to ask the right question about Drivas’s incentive alignment. Normally, a Canadian small-cap has a value of $345M, produces earnings of $24M, and remunerates its CEO circa $770,000 per year. Normally I'd use market cap and profit as factors determining performance, however, API's negative earnings lower the usefulness of my formula. Given the range of pay for small-cap executives, it seems like Drivas is being paid within the bounds of reasonableness. On the whole, even though API is loss-making, it seems like the CEO’s pay is fair.

Next Steps:

My conclusion is that Drivas is not being overpaid. But your role as a shareholder should not end here. As above, this is a relatively simplistic calculation using high-level benchmarket. Proactive shareholders should question their representatives (i.e. the board of directors) how they think about the CEO's incentive alignment with shareholders and how they balance this with retention and reward. If you have not done so already, I urge you to complete your research by taking a look at the following:

  1. Governance: To find out more about API's governance, look through our infographic report of the company's board and management.
  2. Financial Health: Does it have a healthy balance sheet? Take a look at our free balance sheet analysis with six simple checks on key factors like leverage and risk.
  3. Other High-Growth Alternatives: Are there other high-growth stocks you could be holding instead of API? Explore our interactive list of stocks with large growth potential to get an idea of what else is out there you may be missing!

New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One Place

We've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.

• Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency
• Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile
• Track the Fair Value of your stocks

Try a Demo Portfolio for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

Simply Wall St analyst Simply Wall St and Simply Wall St have no position in any of the companies mentioned. This article is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.