Spark Networks SE

Informe acción OTCPK:LOVL.Q

Capitalización de mercado: US$2.6k

This company listing is no longer active

This company may still be operating, however this listing is no longer active. Find out why through their latest events.

Spark Networks Dividendos y recompras

Dividendo controles de criterios 0/6

Spark Networks no tiene historial de pago de dividendo.

Información clave

n/a

Rentabilidad por dividendo

n/a

Rendimiento de la recompra

Rendimiento total para el accionistan/a
Rendimiento futuro de los dividendosn/a
Crecimiento de los dividendosn/a
Próxima fecha de pago de dividendosn/a
Fecha ex dividendon/a
Dividendo por acciónn/a
Ratio de pagon/a

Últimas actualizaciones de dividendos y recompras

No hay actualizaciones

Recent updates

Artículo de análisis • Feb 25

Spark Networks (NASDAQ:LOV) Use Of Debt Could Be Considered Risky

The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says...
Seeking Alpha • Oct 17

Spark Networks: The Ugly Girl At The Prom

Summary Spark Networks has shown little improvement in recent months. Insiders aren’t touching the stock. Other than a buyout, I see limited upside. Management doesn't seem to have a plan for how to improve operations. Update & Thesis Back in June, I wrote a piece comparing Match Group (MTCH) and Spark Networks (LOV). In summary, I gave Match a "hold" since I disliked the company but didn't have enough of a reason to initiate a bearish view. I gave Spark a "sell" based on their business models and income statements. Match is down 41% since the publication and Spark is down 45%. While both stocks have decreased in value, I will credit the bear market for the decline instead of my foresight. I still believe Spark has much more room to fall if they continue the status quo. There has been no observable improvement in the business model flaws discussed in my last writing. Spark Networks is an online dating conglomerate with 12 different platforms. Prior to the Zoosk acquisition, the company mainly operated dating sites on an exclusionary basis and did not utilize the Networking Effect. For example, Jdate is likely to discourage a Christian from using the platform. Even more odd is that Spark operates JSwipe as a second separate Jewish-based dating platform. Why would a business compartmentalize such a specific demographic and not merge them? This would be akin to Amazon (AMZN) operating completely separate sites for adults under 30 and over 30. Spark Networks Subsidiaries (Spark Networks) In my opinion, this is a terrible business strategy and the company's financials prove it to be true. As discussed in my last piece on Spark, the business model limits the company's scalability. What's peculiar is I believe this flaw is extremely obvious and can't comprehend how management doesn't see it. Transcripts are full of excuses with no results. I see no positive long-term prospects for Spark Networks other than a possible buyout. Management: Excuses, Excuses Sparks failed to capitalize on the Covid lockdowns like other dating companies have. As you can see here, the company did grow their revenue during the lockdown period. This was the opportunity of a lifetime for online dating companies: in-person dating was put on hold and the only way to mingle was through the internet. If Spark was going to grow its user base, this was the time to do so. It is now October 2022, a full 30 months since the start of Covid. As you can see from the income statement, the company is now recording losses in operating and net income now that the lockdowns are over. Other than the Zoosk acquisition, the company still hasn't pivoted away from its exclusivity business model. Transcripts show what I believe to be a lack of direction on management's part. The absence of insider purchases even as the stock price declined this year suggests a lack of belief. Below are some quotes from the CEO, none of which give me confidence in the company for the long term. "We saw an increase in fraud on our SilverSingles and EliteSingles platform, which we believe led to lower performance versus our expectations." "Our Board has been highly engaged with the company's external financial, legal and strategic advisers to identify and assess a range of alternatives to enhance Spark's value" "We are working to simplify our technology infrastructure by moving our primary brands from 3 platforms to 2. While we have made good progress in our plan, we prioritize some of our resources to focus on safety, delaying our transition to H1 next year." "We continue to make progress on getting Zoosk back to growth." "If you have subscribers that are going to renew but had a bad experience, they wouldn't renew." - CEO Eric Eichmann To be fair, management did make statements that can inspire some optimism. The company restructured its debt, by negotiating a package with MGG Investment Group, and which you can read about in detail here. In short, the company elected to take on more debt but with a longer maturity date. As you can see on Spark's balance sheet, long-term debt increased from $85M to $105M YOY. Total Cash on hand remained roughly flat from the June 2021 quarter as well. So why am I still bearish? The concern here is not that the business has challenges, such as fraud and security on the platforms. The concern is that Spark's competitors such as Bumble (BMBL) and Tinder are meeting them head on and continue to be top companies in the industry while Spark Networks is stalled. From a financial standpoint, both competitors mentioned have a history of profitability. 5-Year Net Income (Seeking Alpha) From an operational standpoint, Spark's competitors are already delivering value to their user base. Match is looking to add features to its platform and does not appear not focused on restructuring debt. Bumble and Tinder are also extremely simple to use, which is why I believe their user base is so engaged. These quotes suggest to me that management is behind the curve and playing catch-up. The statements are focused on correcting past mistakes rather than specific plans of how they will grow their user base. This suggests to me that management doesn't have what it takes to be an innovator in the online dating space. Further proof of this is Spark's largest platform based on number of users is Zoosk, which came from an acquisition and not from organic growth. Zoosk is also ranked #11 in total users according to Business Of Apps. Zoosk has also decreased in rank since 2015 as the images below show. It should also be noted that five of the 2021 top 10 dating platforms are owned by Match Group: Tinder, Plenty of Fish, Hinge, OkCupid, and Match. Bumble has two in the top 10 as Bumble owns Badoo.
Seeking Alpha • Aug 09

Spark Networks reports Q2 results; narrows FY22 soft guidance

Spark Networks press release (NASDAQ:LOV): Q2 net loss was $8.8M, compared to $49.0M in the second quarter of 2021. Adjusted EBITDA loss was $1.7M, compared to Adjusted EBITDA of $8.6M in the second quarter of 2021. Revenue of $48.04M (-13.0% Y/Y). Total paid subscribers grew from 831,000 to 838,000 sequentially in the second quarter.  "We now expect total revenue for the year to be down low to mid-single digits on a percentage basis as compared to 2021. On a constant currency basis, we expect full-year 2022 revenue to be consistent with full-year 2021 revenue. On the profitability side, although we expect full-year Adjusted EBITDA to be lower than previously anticipated, we expect to deliver low double-digit Adjusted EBITDA margins for the full year."
Artículo de análisis • Jun 07

Spark Networks (NASDAQ:LOV) Takes On Some Risk With Its Use Of Debt

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to...
Seeking Alpha • Jun 02

Spark Networks: Love Might Be In The Air Again

Today, we take our first in-depth look at Spark Networks in over two years. This dating site operator has been severely impacted by the pandemic. Can the shares turn around as the coronavirus outbreak ebbs? A full investment analysis follows in the paragraphs below.
Artículo de análisis • Apr 05

Does Spark Networks (NYSEMKT:LOV) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the...
Artículo de análisis • Mar 08

How Much Did Spark Networks'(NYSEMKT:LOV) Shareholders Earn From Share Price Movements Over The Last Three Years?

Spark Networks SE ( NYSEMKT:LOV ) shareholders should be happy to see the share price up 11% in the last quarter. But...
Artículo de análisis • Feb 01

Spark Networks SE's (NYSEMKT:LOV) About To Shift From Loss To Profit

Spark Networks SE ( NYSEMKT:LOV ) is possibly approaching a major achievement in its business, so we would like to...
Artículo de análisis • Dec 26

What Type Of Shareholders Own The Most Number of Spark Networks SE (NYSEMKT:LOV) Shares?

The big shareholder groups in Spark Networks SE ( NYSEMKT:LOV ) have power over the company. Insiders often own a large...
Artículo de análisis • Nov 30

Spark Networks'(NYSEMKT:LOV) Share Price Is Down 54% Over The Past Three Years.

The truth is that if you invest for long enough, you're going to end up with some losing stocks. But long term Spark...

Estabilidad y crecimiento de los pagos

Obteniendo datos sobre dividendos

Dividendo estable: No hay datos suficientes para determinar si los dividendos por acción de LOVL.Q han sido estables en el pasado.

Dividendo creciente: Datos insuficientes para determinar si los pagos de dividendos de LOVL.Q han aumentado.

Rentabilidad por dividendo vs. Mercado

Rentabilidad por dividendo de Spark Networks vs. Mercado
¿Cómo se compara la rentabilidad por dividendo de LOVL.Q con la del mercado?
SegmentoRentabilidad por dividendo
Empresa (LOVL.Q)n/a
Suelo de mercado 25% (US)1.4%
Techo de mercado 25% (US)4.2%
Media de la industria (Interactive Media and Services)0.3%
Analista de previsiones (LOVL.Q) (hasta 3 años)n/a

Dividendo destacado: No es posible evaluar la rentabilidad por dividendo de LOVL.Q en comparación con el 25% inferior de los pagadores de dividendos, ya que la empresa no ha comunicado ningún pago reciente.

Alto dividendo: No es posible evaluar la rentabilidad por dividendo de LOVL.Q en comparación con el 25% de los principales pagadores de dividendos, ya que la empresa no ha comunicado ningún pago reciente.

Pago de beneficios a los accionistas

Cobertura de los beneficios: No hay datos suficientes para calcular el ratio de pago de LOVL.Q para determinar si sus pagos de dividendos están cubiertos por los beneficios.

Pago en efectivo a los accionistas

Cobertura de flujo de caja: No es posible calcular la sostenibilidad de los dividendos, ya que LOVL.Q no ha comunicado ningún pago.

Descubre empresas que pagan buenos dividendos

7D

1Y

7D

1Y

7D

1Y

Análisis de la empresa y estado de los datos financieros

DatosÚltima actualización (huso horario UTC)
Análisis de la empresa2024/07/13 05:20
Precio de las acciones al final del día2024/07/08 00:00
Beneficios2023/06/30
Ingresos anuales2022/12/31

Fuentes de datos

Los datos utilizados en nuestro análisis de empresas proceden de S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC. Los siguientes datos se utilizan en nuestro modelo de análisis para generar este informe. Los datos están normalizados, lo que puede introducir un retraso desde que la fuente está disponible.

PaqueteDatosMarco temporalEjemplo Fuente EE.UU. *
Finanzas de la empresa10 años
  • Cuenta de resultados
  • Estado de tesorería
  • Balance
Estimaciones del consenso de analistas+3 años
  • Previsiones financieras
  • Objetivos de precios de los analistas
Precios de mercado30 años
  • Precios de las acciones
  • Dividendos, escisiones y acciones
Propiedad10 años
  • Accionistas principales
  • Información privilegiada
Gestión10 años
  • Equipo directivo
  • Consejo de Administración
Principales avances10 años
  • Anuncios de empresas

* Ejemplo para valores de EE.UU., para no EE.UU. se utilizan formularios y fuentes normativas equivalentes.

A menos que se especifique lo contrario, todos los datos financieros se basan en un periodo anual, pero se actualizan trimestralmente. Esto se conoce como datos de los últimos doce meses (TTM) o de los últimos doce meses (LTM). Más información.

Modelo de análisis y copo de nieve

Los detalles del modelo de análisis utilizado para generar este informe están disponibles en nuestra página de Github, también tenemos guías sobre cómo utilizar nuestros informes y tutoriales en Youtube.

Conozca al equipo de talla mundial que diseñó y construyó el modelo de análisis Simply Wall St.

Métricas industriales y sectoriales

Simply Wall St calcula cada 6 horas nuestras métricas sectoriales y de sección. Los detalles de nuestro proceso están disponibles en Github.

Fuentes analistas

Spark Networks SE está cubierta por 2 analistas. 0 de esos analistas presentaron las estimaciones de ingresos o ganancias utilizadas como datos para nuestro informe. Las estimaciones de los analistas se actualizan a lo largo del día.

AnalistaInstitución
Rajiv SharmaB. Riley Securities, Inc.
Austin MoldowCanaccord Genuity