Advertisement
- United States
- /
- Electric Utilities
- /
- NYSE:ES
Eversource Exit From Offshore Wind Recasts Focus On Regulated Earnings
Simply Wall St
Reviewed by Bailey Pemberton
- Eversource Energy (NYSE:ES) is exiting its offshore wind partnership with Orsted.
- The company plans to refocus on its core regulated utility operations following this exit.
- This change affects how Eversource allocates capital between renewables projects and regulated businesses.
Eversource Energy runs regulated electric, gas, and water utilities, which typically follow defined rate frameworks set by regulators. Stepping away from the offshore wind joint venture signals a preference for these core operations over large, complex generation projects. For you as an investor, the shift centers attention on the stability and risk profile of regulated assets versus development-oriented clean energy projects.
The move also raises questions about how Eversource will participate in the broader transition to cleaner power sources. You may want to watch how management redeploys capital, updates long-term investment plans, and discusses future clean energy initiatives within its regulated footprint.
Stay updated on the most important news stories for Eversource Energy by adding it to your watchlist or portfolio. Alternatively, explore our Community to discover new perspectives on Eversource Energy.
How Eversource Energy stacks up against its biggest competitors
Eversource Energy’s exit from its 50% offshore wind partnership with Orsted points to a tighter focus on lower risk, regulated transmission and distribution, rather than large-scale generation projects that can be complex and capital intensive. For you, that means the company is leaning into a simpler, rate-base driven model more in line with peers like Consolidated Edison and Duke Energy, while still keeping room for clean energy within its regulated footprint.
Eversource Energy narrative: refocusing the story on core earnings
The move aligns with existing narratives that emphasize regulated earnings, grid modernization and balance sheet strength as key themes for Eversource. The continued pattern of annual dividend increases, including the recently approved US$0.7875 quarterly dividend, fits with a company positioning itself around steady cash flows rather than large development risk, even as it still pursues clean energy projects such as geothermal, solar and storage.
Risks and rewards: what this shift could mean for you
- ⚠️ Concentrating on regulated activities may reduce exposure to offshore wind upside if that part of the power mix grows faster than expected.
- ⚠️ Analysts have flagged interest coverage and dividend cash flow coverage as watchpoints, so reduced capital needs from wind do not automatically remove financial risk.
- 🎁 A clearer focus on core utility operations can support more predictable earnings profiles compared with large development projects.
- 🎁 Steady dividend increases over many years suggest management aims to keep shareholder returns tied closely to regulated cash generation.
What to watch next
From here, you may want to track how Eversource reallocates capital into grid investments, how regulators respond to its updated plans, and how its approach to clean energy compares with peers like NextEra Energy and American Electric Power. If you want more context on how this fits into longer term earnings, risks and valuation debates, check out community narratives for Eversource Energy on the company’s dedicated page.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.
Discover if Eversource Energy might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.
Access Free AnalysisHave feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
About NYSE:ES
Eversource Energy
A public utility holding company, engages in the energy delivery business.
Established dividend payer and good value.
Similar Companies
Market Insights
Advertisement
Weekly Picks
JO
Jolt_Communications on Myseum ·
The Future of Social Sharing Is Private and People Are Ready
Fair Value:US$7.9577.1% undervalued
19 followersusers have followed this narrative
0 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
0 likesusers have liked this narrative
TO
Tokyo on ASML Holding ·
EU#3 - From Philips Management Buyout to Europe’s Biggest Company
Fair Value:€1.31k7.1% undervalued
27 followersusers have followed this narrative
2 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
11 likesusers have liked this narrative
YI
yiannisz on Booking Holdings ·
Booking Holdings: Why Ground-Level Travel Trends Still Favor the Platform Giants
Fair Value:US$5.47k8.5% undervalued
6 followersusers have followed this narrative
0 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
4 likesusers have liked this narrative
CO
composite32 on Shell ·
A fully integrated LNG business seems to be ignored by the market.
Fair Value:UK£36.122.6% undervalued
35 followersusers have followed this narrative
0 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
9 likesusers have liked this narrative
Recently Updated Narratives
BL
BlackGoat on Palantir Technologies ·
Palantir: Redefining Enterprise Software for the AI Era
Fair Value:US$107.0237.0% overvalued
194 followersusers have followed this narrative
6 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
1 likeusers have liked this narrative
AN
andre_santos on Microsoft ·
Microsoft - A Fundamental and Historical Valuation
Fair Value:US$437.171.6% undervalued
17 followersusers have followed this narrative
4 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
0 likesusers have liked this narrative
UN
unknown on Merck ·
The Oncology Anchor: Why Merck’s 46% Discount Defies the Keytruda Cliff
Fair Value:US$201.5645.3% undervalued
1 followerusers have followed this narrative
0 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
0 likesusers have liked this narrative
Popular Narratives
OO
OOO97 on Neo Performance Materials ·
Undervalued Key Player in Magnets/Rare Earth
Fair Value:CA$25.3324.4% undervalued
71 followersusers have followed this narrative
0 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
19 likesusers have liked this narrative
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget on NVIDIA ·
NVDA: Expanding AI Demand Will Drive Major Data Center Investments Through 2026
Fair Value:US$253.0224.5% undervalued
1047 followersusers have followed this narrative
6 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
31 likesusers have liked this narrative
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget on Amazon.com ·
AMZN: Acceleration In Cloud And AI Will Drive Margin Expansion Ahead
Fair Value:US$295.6119.1% undervalued
1342 followersusers have followed this narrative
5 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
11 likesusers have liked this narrative
Trending Discussion
JA
jayhcee on Motorcar Parts of America ·
MPAA often has inventory and core-related timing issues. While this quarter’s problems may ease, similar issues have recurred historically and can persist for several quarters. It's not a one-off, it's a structural part of their business. Core returns are simply estimates: How many customers will actually return the original part; how quickly they'll do so; how many are useable; what they're worth, etc. MPAA predicts X sales in a quarter and Y core returns and its reserves, inventory values, etc. are based on that. If they expect a 90% core return rate and only 80% come back it doesn't change cash but they have to write down inventory and increase cost of goods sold which impacts EPS. They've also cited inventory buildup at key customers multiple times in the past. The assumption the latest backlog will all shift into future quarters this year with no impact on pricing, etc. seems more like wishful thinking. Retailer X was slated to buy $10m in parts this quarter but finds they have a lot more inventory on hand than they anticipated so they pushed the order. Realistically there are likely to be SKU cuts, reduction in safety stock on others, etc. Assuming that all $10m will come in this year plus the regular replenishment seems pretty unrealistic. MPAA also has a shaky track record when it comes to new lines and the supposed impact on business. If you look at the EV testing solutions hype back around 2020 that was supposed to diversify them beyond traditional reman and be a higher margin business that would grow with EV adoption. But it has never turned into a material contributor. The debt reduction and stock buy backs are meaningful but IMHO this narrative takes a very optimistic view of things.
0
|0
US
User on Discovery Silver ·
The problem with your reasoning is, that 37 Moz are AgEq. If you read the FS, you'll find out that annual silver production is more around 14-15 Moz. But at the time of the FS, that 37 Moz AgEq was a number that came of a formula (which is specified in the FS), being a mix of four metals: Ag, Au, Pb and Zc. But now, beginning of 2026, the spotprices of silver and gold have risen so much in comparison to Pb and Zc prices, that you need to recalculate the AgEq number of 37 Moz according to the recent prices. This will result in the fact that silver and gold hold more value in that mix of four metals, and thus dragg the 37 Moz AgEQ number down to somewhere around 18 Moz AgEq. The more valuable silver and gold become, the lower the AgEq number will get, but it'll never get under the yearly average production of silver, which should be somewhere between 14-15 Moz Ag in the first four years. So in short, with this in mind, your fair value is rather around CA$ 50, even with silver at 300 usd an ounce. But a more prudent stockprice forecast is around CA$ 20 and hopefully going toward CA$ 30. So DSV is a top stock, because it's producing actual gold every quarter. But don't put your hopes too high.
0
|0