Microsoft Perplexity Deal Puts Azure Multi Model AI Strategy Under Scrutiny

  • Microsoft (NasdaqGS:MSFT) has signed a multi year, US$750 million partnership with AI startup Perplexity.
  • Perplexity will use Microsoft Azure's Foundry service to run models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI on Azure infrastructure.
  • The agreement highlights Azure's positioning as a multi model AI hosting platform rather than a channel for a single model provider.

For you as an investor looking at Microsoft (NasdaqGS:MSFT), this deal sits at the intersection of cloud and generative AI, two areas that are central to the company’s long term strategy. Azure is providing computing power and also positioning itself as a neutral venue where different model providers can be accessed in one place. That can matter for customers that want flexibility across OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI and potentially others without committing to a single stack.

The Perplexity agreement also highlights key questions investors are asking about AI spending at Microsoft, including capital intensity, customer concentration and the timing of potential returns. As Azure signs more multi model workloads, the mix of customers and use cases using its AI infrastructure could become an important factor to watch, alongside headline figures on overall cloud demand.

Stay updated on the most important news stories for Microsoft by adding it to your watchlist or portfolio. Alternatively, explore our Community to discover new perspectives on Microsoft.

NasdaqGS:MSFT Earnings & Revenue Growth as at Feb 2026
NasdaqGS:MSFT Earnings & Revenue Growth as at Feb 2026

How Microsoft stacks up against its biggest competitors

Perplexity’s three year, US$750 million commitment signals that Microsoft is trying to turn Azure into a neutral, multi model hub where AI customers can mix and match models from OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI and others on one platform. For you, the key point is that this adds another large AI workload to Azure at a time when investors are closely watching how Microsoft converts heavy AI infrastructure spending into contracted usage, especially as rivals like Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud are also courting AI start ups and enterprises.

Advertisement

How this fits into the Microsoft AI narrative

The Perplexity deal lines up with the existing narrative that Microsoft wants Azure to be the default place enterprises build AI powered applications, on top of Copilot, GitHub and sector specific offerings in areas like healthcare and finance. It also slightly broadens the picture beyond OpenAI, which matters given recent concerns that a large share of Microsoft’s commercial backlog is tied to a single AI partner.

Risks and rewards investors should weigh

  • Another committed AI customer helps support Azure usage at a time when commercial remaining performance obligations are already very large.
  • Multi model access can make Azure more attractive versus Amazon and Google for companies that do not want to be locked into one AI stack.
  • The economic value of the US$750 million depends on contract specific terms such as when capacity is available, which models are production ready and which regions can bill per token.
  • Multi cloud setups like Perplexity’s use of both AWS and Azure can increase network and data egress costs, so margins on this type of workload are not guaranteed.

What to watch next

From here, it is worth tracking whether Microsoft discloses more large multi model Foundry deals, how quickly contracted commitments like this turn into reported Azure revenue, and whether customer concentration in OpenAI gradually eases. If you want to see how other investors are thinking about these trade offs, you can check community narratives on Microsoft through this dedicated page and compare different long term viewpoints against this new partnership.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One Place

We've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.

• Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency
• Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile
• Track the Fair Value of your stocks

Try a Demo Portfolio for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

About NasdaqGS:MSFT

Microsoft

Develops and supports software, services, devices, and solutions worldwide.

Very undervalued with outstanding track record and pays a dividend.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

JO
Jolt_Communications
MYSE logo
Jolt_Communications on Myseum ·

The Future of Social Sharing Is Private and People Are Ready

Fair Value:US$7.9577.1% undervalued
22 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
TO
Tokyo
ASML logo
Tokyo on ASML Holding ·

EU#3 - From Philips Management Buyout to Europe’s Biggest Company

Fair Value:€1.31k7.1% undervalued
28 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
11 users have liked this narrative
YI
BKNG logo
yiannisz on Booking Holdings ·

Booking Holdings: Why Ground-Level Travel Trends Still Favor the Platform Giants

Fair Value:US$5.47k8.5% undervalued
6 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
4 users have liked this narrative
CO
composite32
SHEL logo
composite32 on Shell ·

A fully integrated LNG business seems to be ignored by the market.

Fair Value:UK£36.122.6% undervalued
37 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

CL
Clive_Thompson
ROG logo
Clive_Thompson on Roche Holding ·

Roche Holding AG To Benefit From Strong Drug Pipeline In 2027 And Beyond

Fair Value:CHF 430.0118.4% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
CO
composite32
OTKAR logo
composite32 on Otokar Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi ·

Otokar is the first choice for tactical armored land vehicles to meet Europe's defense industry needs.

Fair Value:₺668.1135.3% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
BL
BlackGoat
PLTR logo
BlackGoat on Palantir Technologies ·

Palantir: Redefining Enterprise Software for the AI Era

Fair Value:US$107.0237.0% overvalued
201 users have followed this narrative
6 users have commented on this narrative
3 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

OO
NEO logo
OOO97 on Neo Performance Materials ·

Undervalued Key Player in Magnets/Rare Earth

Fair Value:CA$25.3324.4% undervalued
71 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
19 users have liked this narrative
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget
NVDA logo
AnalystConsensusTarget on NVIDIA ·

NVDA: Expanding AI Demand Will Drive Major Data Center Investments Through 2026

Fair Value:US$253.0224.5% undervalued
1047 users have followed this narrative
6 users have commented on this narrative
31 users have liked this narrative
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget
AMZN logo
AnalystConsensusTarget on Amazon.com ·

AMZN: Acceleration In Cloud And AI Will Drive Margin Expansion Ahead

Fair Value:US$295.6119.1% undervalued
1343 users have followed this narrative
5 users have commented on this narrative
11 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

JA
jayhcee
MPAA logo
jayhcee on Motorcar Parts of America ·

MPAA often has inventory and core-related timing issues. While this quarter’s problems may ease, similar issues have recurred historically and can persist for several quarters. It's not a one-off, it's a structural part of their business. Core returns are simply estimates: How many customers will actually return the original part; how quickly they'll do so; how many are useable; what they're worth, etc. MPAA predicts X sales in a quarter and Y core returns and its reserves, inventory values, etc. are based on that. If they expect a 90% core return rate and only 80% come back it doesn't change cash but they have to write down inventory and increase cost of goods sold which impacts EPS. They've also cited inventory buildup at key customers multiple times in the past. The assumption the latest backlog will all shift into future quarters this year with no impact on pricing, etc. seems more like wishful thinking. Retailer X was slated to buy $10m in parts this quarter but finds they have a lot more inventory on hand than they anticipated so they pushed the order. Realistically there are likely to be SKU cuts, reduction in safety stock on others, etc. Assuming that all $10m will come in this year plus the regular replenishment seems pretty unrealistic. MPAA also has a shaky track record when it comes to new lines and the supposed impact on business. If you look at the EV testing solutions hype back around 2020 that was supposed to diversify them beyond traditional reman and be a higher margin business that would grow with EV adoption. But it has never turned into a material contributor. The debt reduction and stock buy backs are meaningful but IMHO this narrative takes a very optimistic view of things.

0
|
0
Advertisement