company background image

Revlon NYSE:REV Stock Report

Last Price


Market Cap







12 Aug, 2022


Company Financials
REV fundamental analysis
Snowflake Score
Future Growth0/6
Past Performance0/6
Financial Health2/6

REV Stock Overview

Revlon, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, develops, manufactures, markets, distributes, and sells beauty and personal care products worldwide.

Revlon Competitors

Price History & Performance

Summary of all time highs, changes and price drops for Revlon
Historical stock prices
Current Share PriceUS$6.56
52 Week HighUS$17.65
52 Week LowUS$1.08
1 Month Change16.31%
3 Month Change31.20%
1 Year Change-42.91%
3 Year Change-60.88%
5 Year Change-62.41%
Change since IPO-97.63%

Recent News & Updates

Aug 09

Revlon CFO Victoria Dolan to retire

Revlon (NYSE:REV) has announced changes in its finance leadership, with CFO Victoria Dolan retiring. Ms. Dolan will remain with the company until Sep. 30, 2022 to ensure a smooth transition of her responsibilities. Matt Kvarda, Managing Director at Alvarez & Marsal, will join Revlon (REV) as interim CFO, effective Oct. 01, 2022. Mr. Kvarda holds nearly 30 years of experience, serving in interim leadership roles at numerous companies including as interim CFO at TEAM (TISI) and interim CFO at Jacuzzi Brands.

Aug 01

Hearing On Friday Was A Disaster For Bankrupt Revlon Shareholders

At the very end of the DIP hearing on Friday, Judge Jones seemed to indicate he would not require extending the November filing date of the RSA and plan. An oral decision on various DIP issue was delivered by Judge Jones during the final hearing on Monday August 1. Judge Jones, who is a new bankruptcy judge, does not seem to be decisive and does not seem to be "shareholder friendly". Mittleman is using an ad hoc shareholder group to advocate for Revlon shareholders. Since milestones were not extended, it is a major negative development for investors. Based on a statement by Judge Jones at the very end of Friday's DIP financing hearing for bankrupt Revlon (REV) it looks like the critical November milestone to file a restructuring support agreement - RSA will not be extended. This is a major blow, in my opinion, to Revlon investors because, as I covered in a prior article, a filing of a RSA after the holiday selling period most likely would reflect an improved Revlon. A final decision by Judge Jones was made during Monday's hearing not to require any extensions. Various parties also had a meeting with Revlon's management earlier on Monday morning. This article is an update to previous articles. DIP Hearing I "attended" the DIP financing (amended DIP agreement docket 299) hearings on Thursday, Friday, and Monday via Zoom. While the hearings never got intense, a number of participants seemed frustrated during the process. (See below for my opinion of Judge Jones.) Before the lunch break on Friday, Judge Jones urged the various parties to reach settlements on the outstanding issues and at that time also indicated that he was leaning towards an extension of the November 1 DIP milestone to file a RSA and November 30 to file an "acceptable" plan. After lunch, the lawyer representing the BrandCo DIP lenders offered to extend those dates to November 15 and December 14. The lawyer representing the Official Unsecured Creditors Committee stated that various new proposed changes (There were also other proposed changes.) were "insulting". I agree. They are almost meaningless and are just a way to imply to the court that BrandCo lenders are in control here. After additional testimonies and statements ended late on Friday, Judge Jones stated he would not make a decision until Monday August 1. He again urged the various parties to reach settlements on various issues over the weekend. At the very end, he stated that he would agree to the "business judgement" of Revlon's management that they would be able to file a RSA by November 1, which is a change from before lunch. Originally, the BrandCo DIP lenders wanted a RSA filed by the end of July and plan by the end of August. Revlon originally wanted to have until the end of December to create a business plan that would be used as a basis in negotiating a RSA. Those parties eventually agreed to creating a business plan by September 30 and filing a RSA by November 1. During the hearings, Revlon had to defend their "business judgement" that they could complete a reasonable business plan by September 30. The Official Unsecured Creditors Committee strongly disagreed with that "business judgement". They thought much more time was needed to create a business plan that reflected an improved supply chain/vendor operation. In a very unusual move, Revlon's lawyers filed a short "Closing Argument" (docket 311) near the end of the day that further asserted that the court must follow management's "business judgement". Revlon's Stock Price Since June 15 Bankruptcy Filing REV data by YCharts Impact of Judge David Jones Judge Jones is a new bankruptcy judge and was a major disappointment, in my opinion. He did not have control over the process and seemed too reluctant to make needed decisions. I have been in many bankruptcy courts over the years and have watched great judges and poor ones. At this point. he seems unwilling to defend the various priority classes that are being "rolled over" by the BrandCo lenders. He is not a Judge Berstein who was always cognizant of all the stakeholders. The lawyer for the OUC even stated that he (Judge Jones) could assert that if the parties could not agree on certain issues that he would file in these issues himself, which the other Judge David Jones in Texas has done. This lawyer seemed to be implying that the extremely well-respected other Judge Jones "knows what to do and that you don't". I was shocked that Judge Jones told the various parties to be "available" for the rest of late Friday in case he again changes his mind and decides to make an oral ruling late Friday. This was right after he said he would make an oral decision on Monday. "Available"? What? On a late Friday during the summer? Can all these lawyers bill for being "available"? I think that the two page "Closing Argument" that was filed late on Friday by Revlon's lawyers may also indicate that these lawyers also do not have the highest opinion of Judge Jones. The content was at a level for an audience that was just in first year law school - not a sitting federal judge. I do not recall ever seeing a similar type of filing during an actual hearing, but it seemed to have worked. He was leaning towards an extension of the time to file a RSA before lunch and switched to indicating he would follow Revlon's "business judgement", which would not require extending the time. He read his decision during a hearing on Monday that only had some modest changes that were already agreed to last week, including raise the budget to bring litigation from $50,000 to $350,000 and lengthening that challenging period to 90 days from 75 days. The milestone dates will now be November 15 for the RSA filing and December 15 for filing the plan. As I often remind investors, the bankruptcy judge is a very important variable in estimating the recoveries for various claim classes. Often the desktop results are completely different than actual results because of the decisions by the judge. Most investors understand the differences in SCOTUS justices. The same often applies to bankruptcy judges. What I heard during the recent hearings could indicate that Revlon shareholders need to worry that this judge might not be "shareholder friendly" and is not decisive enough to avoid being controlled by the BrandCo lenders. (He definitely is not a "Judge Judy".) Current Business Status Revlon filed for bankruptcy because of liquidity/high leverage and severe supply chain problems. It did not file because of a severely flawed business model that forced Sears into Ch.11. If they can reduce their debt and increase liquidity under a Ch.11 reorganization plan along with a hoped for a much-improved supply chain, they could become a very viable company. With new more creative marketing/advertising campaigns Revlon could again be a leader in their industry. Currently, it is the supply chain issues that are impacting Revlon. According to management, they were only able to fulfil about 70% of their orders at the time they filed for bankruptcy. They are paying $40.4 million on an interim basis and $79.4 million on a final basis of the $130 million accounts payable to pre-petition trade creditors. They absolutely must get needed raw materials to make their products immediately to avoid lower supplies of their 8000 different "stock keeping units". If they don't, it could negatively impact the annual retail "shelf-space allocation" in September. I find it unlikely that these supply chain issues will change enough before the September 30 deadline for filing their business plan. It looks like, in my opinion, that the BrandCo lenders want a business plan and thus a RSA, that reflects these current problems and not one that would reflect an improved operation. They want a lower enterprise valuation number so they can justify getting a larger percentage of the ownership of the new Revlon. (I am assuming that BrandCo lenders are going to attempt to get most of the new equity for their secured claims.) I expect the first indication of Revlon's current financial results will be their monthly operating report - MOR that they should be filing at the end of August for the period from their June bankruptcy filing date thru July 31. This could be a horrible report. Investors need to also remember these MORs do not follow GAAP accounting, so they need to try to make appropriate adjustments. Other Updates At this point, it looks like Mittleman is going to be using an Ad Hoc Group of Non-Insider Shareholders to advocate for Revlon shareholders because an official equity committee has not been appointed. They filed their verified statement (docket 306) that lists members Kevin Barnes owning 20,000 Revlon shares, Adam Gui owning 1,000 shares, and Christopher Mittleman owning 989,525 shares. The meaning of an "acceptable plan" was clarified during the hearings. It does not mean that the BrandCo lenders are requiring as a DIP milestone that they accept the entire plan. It means that the "acceptable" plan must include full cash payment of the DIP financing and the $939 million 1lien BrandCo financing, unless 2/3 of the holders agree to "other treatment". (I am thinking that they will try to get equity in the new Revlon as partial payment, especially since "credit bidding" was mentioned a few times during the recent hearings.)

Jul 26

Revlon: Fasten Your Seatbelts, It's Going To Be A Bumpy Bankruptcy

A hearing is currently set for July 28 for the DIP financing motion, which could be a very heated hearing. Some shareholders have requested that the U.S. Trustee appoint an official equity committee. The Official Unsecured Creditor Committee is requesting the judge to approve an additional three months beyond November 30 to create a reorganization plan. Key employees are getting retention bonuses up to a total of $15.375 million. Trading in bankrupt Revlon (REV) stock has had a bumpy ride over the last few weeks and I expect that their entire Ch.11 bankruptcy process is going to have an extremely bumpy ride because of the complexities of this case. Of course, actual Revlon future operating results are critical for stakeholders, but there are some future judicial decisions that could have dramatic impact on investors holding Revlon's debt and stock. This article is an update to my prior Revlon bankruptcy article. Official Equity Committee As expected, some shareholders filed a request with the U.S. Trustee for an appointment of an official equity committee. (Seeking Alpha broke this story on July 13.) I have reached out to the Office of the U.S. Trustee, but I have not received any official response, but since a committee has not been appointed yet, I am assuming that it was denied at this point. The next step would be for these equity holders to file a request with the bankruptcy court requesting Judge Jones to instruct the U.S. Trustee to appoint an official equity committee. Since he is a very new judge, he has no history on this issue. Official equity committees are covered under section 1102, but that section does not specifically state the requirements for an appointment. Those have been established by a long history of case law. All of the following must be met - not just most: Revlon meets these requirements *Case must be large and complex. *There is an active market for the stock. *The stock is widely held. *The request is timely. Questionable if Revlon meets these requirements *The company is not "hopelessly insolvent". *Shareholders cannot be adequately represented without an official equity committee. Unlikely Revlon meets these requirements *Reasonable chance for meaningful recovery by shareholders. *Shareholder's needs outweigh the costs. Just because an official equity committee is appointed, that does not mean there will be a recovery for Revlon shareholders. Breitburn Energy Partners had one and had fairly high-quality legal representation, but equity holders still received nothing. Horsehead Holding had one, but partially because the committee's legal representation was absolutely horrible, in my opinion, shareholders got nothing. Revlon's Stock Price Last Three Months Data by YCharts DIP Financing Motion The next real fight in this bankruptcy case will be the hearing, which is currently set for July 28 and most likely will continue to the next day, for the approval of the DIP financing motion (docket 28). I expect this will be a very intense hearing because much of the entire case rests on the issues associated with this motion. DIP Facility (docket 44) is for approximately $2 billion: 1) superpriority, senior secured and priming term DIP facility up to $1.025 billion, including a $575 million new money and $450 million refinancing for the prepetition ABL facility. 2) superpriority, senior secured and priming ABL DIP facility up to $400 million. 3) superpriority junior secured intercompany DIP Facility amount not to exceed the amount of royalty payments owed to the BrandCo entities as licensors under the BrandCo license agreements. (Implied amount of up to $575 million) The fight is between the BrandCo DIP lenders and everyone else. In 2020, Revlon transferred much of their intellectual property, including brand names, to new entities (BrandCos). These new entities received royalties under license agreements. On the surface it looks like just a bunch of inter-company payments, but these BrandCos entities issued secured debt. (I plan to cover in more detail the issues associated with these transactions in a future article.) There are many items within the DIP motion that are being fought over and I am just covering a few of them. First, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors filed an objection (docket 239) which included a proposal to extend by at least three months the required DIP milestone period to file an RSA by November 1 and an "acceptable" plan by November 30 (to at least February 1 and early March 2023). This would allow the results of the busy holiday shopping period and the results of potential decreased supply chain problems to be factored into creation of the Ch.11 reorganization plan. (The longer the better for REV shareholders, in my opinion.) The requirement of an "acceptable" plan by BrandCo DIP lenders effectively would mean that the BrandCo DIP lenders would be in the driver's seat creating the plan. Under section 1121(b) the Debtors (Revlon) has a 120 day exclusive period to file a plan and if it is filed within 120 days, it has an automatic extension of an additional 60 days to seek acceptance of the plan. Frequently extensions are sought and given to extend the 120-day period. The Committee is trying to revise this "veto power" by the BrandCo DIP lenders. The proposed DIP does not have a carveout for paying post-petition vendors. The Committee wants a carveout to make vendors much more comfortable about being paid. I think this carveout is absolutely critical for Revlon because some vendors still might be reluctant to deal with Revlon even with being considered section 503(b)(1)((A)) administrative expense claims that have priority to being paid. The problem is that if Revlon's results get worse, they could become "administratively insolvent" and be unable to fully pay administrative expenses. Many vendors might be keenly aware of what happened to Sears Holdings (OTC:SHLDQ) post-petition vendors who agreed to a large "haircut" and are still waiting for payment for their remaining reduced 503(b) claims. Another contested item is that if there are eventually proceeds from litigation against BrandCo lenders that are being asserted by various parties or proceeds from any other litigation, the proceeds become part of the assets that secure the DIP financing. What? So, if BrandCo lenders eventually have to pay a judgement, that same cash could go right back to the BrandCo lenders. (This is our legal system at its finest - not). Of course, the Committee is against this. Key Employees Get a Retention Bonus After a hearing on July 22, Judge Jones approved (docket 281) the key employee retention plan - KERP (docket 116). This would pay approximately 160 "key" employees, who are not insiders, up to a total of $15.375 million. There were some changes from the original proposed KERP, such as the amount was reduced from $16.4 million, but the plan still implies an average payment of $96,000 per employee. This is an attempt to keep employees, but "if any KERP Participant is terminated with cause or quits without good reason prior to the earlier of the confirmation date of a plan and June 30, 2023, any KERP payments received by such KERP Participant shall be repaid" to Revlon. Two Debt Holder Groups These are members of the two primary groups that are currently involved in the bankruptcy process. It is interesting to note that some of these hedge funds own many different types of Revlon debt, including the unsecured notes.

Jun 29

Why REV Stock Is Trending After Filing Chapter 11 Bankruptcy

Revlon, the iconic beauty brand, has filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy. Revlon has been losing market share for years. The bankruptcy filing will give the company a second chance to restructure its debt.

Jun 19

Bankrupt Revlon Had Massive Trading Volume Last Week - What Is Happening?

Revlon was the most active stock on Friday with over 146 million shares traded, compared to a float of just over 7 million shares. Revlon filed for Ch.11 bankruptcy late on June 15 in New York. According to a report, Indian Reliance Industries might be interested in buying Revlon. NYSE has commenced proceedings to delist Revlon. Citibank's $900 million payment error is a wildcard in potential recoveries under a Ch.11 reorganization plan.

Shareholder Returns

REVUS Personal ProductsUS Market

Return vs Industry: REV underperformed the US Personal Products industry which returned -20.3% over the past year.

Return vs Market: REV underperformed the US Market which returned -11.7% over the past year.

Price Volatility

Is REV's price volatile compared to industry and market?
REV volatility
REV Average Weekly Movement52.4%
Personal Products Industry Average Movement10.8%
Market Average Movement7.8%
10% most volatile stocks in US Market16.9%
10% least volatile stocks in US Market3.2%

Stable Share Price: REV is more volatile than 90% of US stocks over the past 3 months, typically moving +/- 52% a week.

Volatility Over Time: REV's weekly volatility has increased from 27% to 52% over the past year.

About the Company

19325,800Debbie Perelman

Revlon, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, develops, manufactures, markets, distributes, and sells beauty and personal care products worldwide. The company's Relvon segment offers color cosmetics and beauty tools under the Revlon brand; and hair color under the Revlon ColorSilk and Revlon Professional brands. Its Elizabeth Arden segment markets, distributes, and sells skin care products under the Elizabeth Arden Ceramide, Prevage, Eight Hour, SUPERSTART, Visible Difference, and Skin Illuminating brands; and fragrances under the Elizabeth Arden White Tea, Elizabeth Arden Red Door, Elizabeth Arden 5th Avenue, and Elizabeth Arden Green Tea brands.

Revlon Fundamentals Summary

How do Revlon's earnings and revenue compare to its market cap?
REV fundamental statistics
Market CapUS$356.09m
Earnings (TTM)-US$385.80m
Revenue (TTM)US$2.06b


P/S Ratio


P/E Ratio

Earnings & Revenue

Key profitability statistics from the latest earnings report
REV income statement (TTM)
Cost of RevenueUS$849.90m
Gross ProfitUS$1.21b
Other ExpensesUS$1.59b

Last Reported Earnings

Jun 30, 2022

Next Earnings Date


Earnings per share (EPS)-7.11
Gross Margin58.71%
Net Profit Margin-18.74%
Debt/Equity Ratio-164.5%

How did REV perform over the long term?

See historical performance and comparison
We’ve recently updated our valuation analysis.


Is REV undervalued compared to its fair value, analyst forecasts and its price relative to the market?

Valuation Score


Valuation Score 2/6

  • Price-To-Sales vs Peers

  • Price-To-Sales vs Industry

  • Price-To-Sales vs Fair Ratio

  • Below Fair Value

  • Significantly Below Fair Value

  • Analyst Forecast

Key Valuation Metric

Which metric is best to use when looking at relative valuation for REV?

Other financial metrics that can be useful for relative valuation.

REV key valuation metrics and ratios. From Price to Earnings, Price to Sales and Price to Book to Price to Earnings Growth Ratio, Enterprise Value and EBITDA.
Key Statistics
Enterprise Value/Revenue1.9x
Enterprise Value/EBITDA18.3x
PEG Ration/a

Price to Sales Ratio vs Peers

How does REV's PS Ratio compare to its peers?

REV PS Ratio vs Peers
The above table shows the PS ratio for REV vs its peers. Here we also display the market cap and forecasted growth for additional consideration.
CompanyPSEstimated GrowthMarket Cap
Peer Average3.6x
EL Estée Lauder Companies
4911 Shiseido Company
OR L'Oréal
REV Revlon

Price-To-Sales vs Peers: REV is good value based on its Price-To-Sales Ratio (0.2x) compared to the peer average (3.6x).

Price to Earnings Ratio vs Industry

How does REV's PE Ratio compare vs other companies in the US Personal Products Industry?

Price-To-Sales vs Industry: REV is good value based on its Price-To-Sales Ratio (0.2x) compared to the US Personal Products industry average (1.6x)

Price to Sales Ratio vs Fair Ratio

What is REV's PS Ratio compared to its Fair PS Ratio? This is the expected PS Ratio taking into account the company's forecast earnings growth, profit margins and other risk factors.

REV PS Ratio vs Fair Ratio.
Fair Ratio
Current PS Ratio0.2x
Fair PS Ration/a

Price-To-Sales vs Fair Ratio: Insufficient data to calculate REV's Price-To-Sales Fair Ratio for valuation analysis.

Share Price vs Fair Value

What is the Fair Price of REV when looking at its future cash flows? For this estimate we use a Discounted Cash Flow model.

Below Fair Value: Insufficient data to calculate REV's fair value for valuation analysis.

Significantly Below Fair Value: Insufficient data to calculate REV's fair value for valuation analysis.

Analyst Price Targets

What is the analyst 12-month forecast and do we have any statistical confidence in the consensus price target?

Analyst Forecast: Insufficient data to show price forecast.

Discover undervalued companies

  • Take a look at our analysis of REV's management and see if the CEO's compensation is within a reasonable range, who is on the board and if insiders have been trading lately.
  • When valuing a company like this, investors focus more on how they perceive the size of the opportunity, the company's ability to deliver and scale, and the strength of the team. While we are not analysing this type of data at the moment, if you don't know where to start, we recommend reading through Revlon regulatory filings.

Future Growth

How is Revlon forecast to perform in the next 1 to 3 years based on estimates from 0 analysts?

Future Growth Score


Future Growth Score 0/6

  • Earnings vs Savings Rate

  • Earnings vs Market

  • High Growth Earnings

  • Revenue vs Market

  • High Growth Revenue

  • Future ROE


Forecasted Household industry annual growth in earnings

In this section we usually present revenue and earnings growth projections based on the consensus estimates of professional analysts to help investors understand the company’s ability to generate profit. But as Revlon has not provided enough past data and has no analyst forecast, its future earnings cannot be reliably calculated by extrapolating past data or using analyst predictions.

This is quite a rare situation as 97% of companies covered by SimplyWall St do have past financial data.

Discover growth companies

  • Take a look at our analysis of REV’s management and see if the CEO’s compensation is within a reasonable range, who is on the board and if insiders have been trading lately.
  • Revlon competitive advantages and company strategy can generally be found in its financial reports archived here.

Past Performance

How has Revlon performed over the past 5 years?

Past Performance Score


Past Performance Score 0/6

  • Quality Earnings

  • Growing Profit Margin

  • Earnings Trend

  • Accelerating Growth

  • Earnings vs Industry

  • High ROE


Historical annual earnings growth

Earnings and Revenue History

Quality Earnings: REV is currently unprofitable.

Growing Profit Margin: REV is currently unprofitable.

Past Earnings Growth Analysis

Earnings Trend: REV is unprofitable, and losses have increased over the past 5 years at a rate of 14.3% per year.

Accelerating Growth: Unable to compare REV's earnings growth over the past year to its 5-year average as it is currently unprofitable

Earnings vs Industry: REV is unprofitable, making it difficult to compare its past year earnings growth to the Personal Products industry (16.1%).

Return on Equity

High ROE: REV's liabilities exceed its assets, so it is difficult to calculate its Return on Equity.

Discover strong past performing companies

Financial Health

How is Revlon's financial position?

Financial Health Score


Financial Health Score 2/6

  • Short Term Liabilities

  • Long Term Liabilities

  • Debt Level

  • Reducing Debt

  • Stable Cash Runway

  • Forecast Cash Runway

Financial Position Analysis

Short Term Liabilities: REV has negative shareholder equity, which is a more serious situation than short term assets not covering short term liabilities.

Long Term Liabilities: REV has negative shareholder equity, which is a more serious situation than short term assets not covering long term liabilities.

Debt to Equity History and Analysis

Debt Level: REV has negative shareholder equity, which is a more serious situation than a high debt level.

Reducing Debt: REV's has negative shareholder equity, so we do not need to check if its debt has reduced over time.

Balance Sheet

Cash Runway Analysis

For companies that have on average been loss making in the past we assess whether they have at least 1 year of cash runway.

Stable Cash Runway: REV has sufficient cash runway for more than 3 years based on its current free cash flow.

Forecast Cash Runway: REV has sufficient cash runway for 2.5 years if free cash flow continues to grow at historical rates of 3.7% each year.

Discover healthy companies


What is Revlon current dividend yield, its reliability and sustainability?

Dividend Score


Dividend Score 0/6

  • Notable Dividend

  • High Dividend

  • Stable Dividend

  • Growing Dividend

  • Earnings Coverage

  • Cash Flow Coverage

Dividend Yield vs Market

Notable Dividend: Unable to evaluate REV's dividend yield against the bottom 25% of dividend payers, as the company has not reported any recent payouts.

High Dividend: Unable to evaluate REV's dividend yield against the top 25% of dividend payers, as the company has not reported any recent payouts.

Stability and Growth of Payments

Stable Dividend: Insufficient data to determine if REV's dividends per share have been stable in the past.

Growing Dividend: Insufficient data to determine if REV's dividend payments have been increasing.

Earnings Payout to Shareholders

Earnings Coverage: Insufficient data to calculate payout ratio to determine if its dividend payments are covered by earnings.

Cash Payout to Shareholders

Cash Flow Coverage: Unable to calculate sustainability of dividends as REV has not reported any payouts.

Discover strong dividend paying companies


How experienced are the management team and are they aligned to shareholders interests?


Average management tenure


Debbie Perelman (48 yo)





Ms. Debra G. Perelman, also known as Debbie M.B.A, was an Advisor at DigitalDx Ventures till October 2021. She is President and Chief Executive Officer at Revlon, Inc. and Revlon Consumer Products Corporat...

CEO Compensation Analysis

Compensation vs Market: Debbie's total compensation ($USD6.78M) is above average for companies of similar size in the US market ($USD2.57M).

Compensation vs Earnings: Debbie's compensation has increased whilst the company is unprofitable.

Leadership Team

Experienced Management: REV's management team is considered experienced (2.4 years average tenure).

Board Members

Experienced Board: REV's board of directors are considered experienced (7.8 years average tenure).


Who are the major shareholders and have insiders been buying or selling?

Insider Trading Volume

Insider Buying: Insufficient data to determine if insiders have bought more shares than they have sold in the past 3 months.

Ownership Breakdown

Dilution of Shares: Shareholders have not been meaningfully diluted in the past year.

Top Shareholders

Company Information

Revlon, Inc.'s employee growth, exchange listings and data sources

Key Information

  • Name: Revlon, Inc.
  • Ticker: REV
  • Exchange: NYSE
  • Founded: 1932
  • Industry: Personal Products
  • Sector: Household
  • Implied Market Cap: US$356.088m
  • Shares outstanding: 54.28m
  • Website:

Number of Employees


  • Revlon, Inc.
  • One New York Plaza
  • New York
  • New York
  • 10004
  • United States


Company Analysis and Financial Data Status

All financial data provided by Standard & Poor's Capital IQ.
DataLast Updated (UTC time)
Company Analysis2022/08/12 00:00
End of Day Share Price2022/08/12 00:00
Annual Earnings2021/12/31

Unless specified all financial data is based on a yearly period but updated quarterly. This is known as Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) or Last Twelve Month (LTM) Data. Learn more here.