Is Carter's (NYSE:CRI) Using Too Much Debt?

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that Carter's, Inc. (NYSE:CRI) does use debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

Advertisement

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

Check out our latest analysis for Carter's

How Much Debt Does Carter's Carry?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Carter's had debt of US$497.9m at the end of September 2024, a reduction from US$567.2m over a year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$175.5m, its net debt is less, at about US$322.4m.

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:CRI Debt to Equity History February 9th 2025

How Healthy Is Carter's' Balance Sheet?

According to the last reported balance sheet, Carter's had liabilities of US$484.1m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$1.06b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$175.5m as well as receivables valued at US$247.0m due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$1.13b.

This deficit is considerable relative to its market capitalization of US$1.82b, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on Carter's' use of debt. Should its lenders demand that it shore up the balance sheet, shareholders would likely face severe dilution.

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

Carter's has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.88. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 15.3 times over. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. While Carter's doesn't seem to have gained much on the EBIT line, at least earnings remain stable for now. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Carter's can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, Carter's produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 72% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.

Our View

Carter's's interest cover was a real positive on this analysis, as was its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow. On the other hand, its level of total liabilities makes us a little less comfortable about its debt. Considering this range of data points, we think Carter's is in a good position to manage its debt levels. Having said that, the load is sufficiently heavy that we would recommend any shareholders keep a close eye on it. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. We've identified 2 warning signs with Carter's (at least 1 which shouldn't be ignored) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

New: AI Stock Screener & Alerts

Our new AI Stock Screener scans the market every day to uncover opportunities.

• Dividend Powerhouses (3%+ Yield)
• Undervalued Small Caps with Insider Buying
• High growth Tech and AI Companies

Or build your own from over 50 metrics.

Explore Now for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

About NYSE:CRI

Carter's

Designs, sources, and markets branded childrenswear in the United States and internationally.

Flawless balance sheet average dividend payer.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

LO
Lou_Basenese
OPTH logo
Lou_Basenese on Optimi Health ·

The Only Psychedelic Company Already Selling MDMA and Psilocybin to Real Patients, Yet Priced Like It Doesn’t Exist

Fair Value:US$1157.5% undervalued
47 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
7 users have liked this narrative
WE
WealthAP
NOVO B logo
WealthAP on Novo Nordisk ·

Novo Nordisk (NVO): Is the "Easy Growth" Story Over?

Fair Value:DKK 407.7721.4% undervalued
67 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative
VA
ValueInvestingSubstack
ZTS logo
ValueInvestingSubstack on Zoetis ·

Zoetis down -50% over the past year

Fair Value:US$92.9218.9% undervalued
23 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative
CE
CentryResearch
LEU logo
CentryResearch on Centrus Energy ·

Centrus Energy: The Next Nuclear Bottleneck Isn't Reactors. It's Fuel.

Fair Value:US$19013.7% undervalued
24 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
10 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

WI
WisetoWealth
PYPL logo
WisetoWealth on PayPal Holdings ·

The Underrated Transformation of a Digital Payments Giant

Fair Value:US$90.3137.8% undervalued
2 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
BL
Blagget
TERA logo
Blagget on Terra Balcanica Resources ·

The C$4M Explorer Positioned to Become Europe's First Antimony Mine

Fair Value:CA$0.487.5% undervalued
2 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
DA
CHTR logo
david_6nroa on Charter Communications ·

Charter is undervalued - Here's why.

Fair Value:US$87.0741.6% overvalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

CU
MSFT logo
CubanEros on Microsoft ·

A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Fair Value:US$419.919.1% undervalued
81 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
6 users have liked this narrative
OS
oscargarcia
NVDA logo
oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

Fair Value:US$28026.1% undervalued
185 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
15 users have liked this narrative
BE
PYPL logo
benjamin_lvieq on PayPal Holdings ·

PayPal: PayPal Doesn't Need to Grow – It Needs to Stop Falling – A Mispriced Cash Machine With a Cannibal Buyback

Fair Value:US$6513.6% undervalued
71 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
11 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

DE
TDOC logo
derek_3wsdg on Teladoc Health ·

You’ve overlooked the activist investor factor. Travis Cocke’s Voss has announced 5% ownership through a 13G filing. They’ve added to that 5% since, and in doing so, have created a structural trap door for 27.42 Million Shares actively sold short. Chuck will announce lots of positives on July 29 but it’s what Voss announces shortly after that will rock the overextended Teledoc shorts. The Walmart partnership is the tip of the iceberg. The market is missing the sheer regulatory and enterprise friction of modern corporate healthcare. Teladoc isn't a "consumer app"; it is the primary digital infrastructure integrated directly into the legacy backends of Tier-1 insurance companies and fortune 500 employers, covering 105 million+ lives. Teladoc is acting as the digital top-of-funnel engine for the world's largest retailer. If Voss pushes the narrative that Teladoc is effectively the outsourced digital brain of Walmart's entire healthcare footprint, the fair value shifts from a basic health multiple to an enterprise distribution premium. Additionally , we are in a structural gold rush for high-quality, legally compliant, longitudinal medical data to train vertical healthcare AI models. Large technology hyperscalers and pharmaceutical giants cannot simply scrape the internet for this; they need structured clinical inputs. Teladoc sits on one of the largest de-identified virtual medical datasets on earth. From the activist playbook , we’ll see Voss demand the immediate creation of a Data & Diagnostics Licensing Division, transforming a legacy liability into an incredibly high-margin, pure-software data asset that requires zero human clinician hours to scale. Chuck is doing great work and deserves credi5 for the Teledoc turnaround but it will be Travis Cocke who will be responsible for a share price way beyond your $15 valuation.

1
|
0