Is Dixie Group (NASDAQ:DXYN) Using Too Much Debt?

Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We note that The Dixie Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:DXYN) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

Advertisement

When Is Debt A Problem?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

See our latest analysis for Dixie Group

What Is Dixie Group's Debt?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Dixie Group had US$46.1m of debt in September 2021, down from US$57.0m, one year before. However, it also had US$1.25m in cash, and so its net debt is US$44.8m.

debt-equity-history-analysis
NasdaqGM:DXYN Debt to Equity History February 24th 2022

How Strong Is Dixie Group's Balance Sheet?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Dixie Group had liabilities of US$65.8m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$97.0m due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$1.25m in cash and US$42.0m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$119.6m.

This deficit casts a shadow over the US$59.6m company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. At the end of the day, Dixie Group would probably need a major re-capitalization if its creditors were to demand repayment.

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

Dixie Group has net debt worth 1.5 times EBITDA, which isn't too much, but its interest cover looks a bit on the low side, with EBIT at only 3.6 times the interest expense. While these numbers do not alarm us, it's worth noting that the cost of the company's debt is having a real impact. We also note that Dixie Group improved its EBIT from a last year's loss to a positive US$19m. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is Dixie Group's earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So it's worth checking how much of the earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) is backed by free cash flow. During the last year, Dixie Group burned a lot of cash. While investors are no doubt expecting a reversal of that situation in due course, it clearly does mean its use of debt is more risky.

Our View

To be frank both Dixie Group's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow and its track record of staying on top of its total liabilities make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. But at least it's pretty decent at managing its debt, based on its EBITDA,; that's encouraging. After considering the datapoints discussed, we think Dixie Group has too much debt. While some investors love that sort of risky play, it's certainly not our cup of tea. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example Dixie Group has 4 warning signs (and 1 which is significant) we think you should know about.

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One Place

We've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.

• Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency
• Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile
• Track the Fair Value of your stocks

Try a Demo Portfolio for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

mitchell_lawler

Micron (MU) is booming, and it still doesn't look ‘expensive’ based on next year's earnings. So why does our own valuation say it could be worth 40% less?

78
zoe_vi5fn

A low price to earnings ratio at the top of the cycle is a warning rather than a bargain, and a terrifyingly high one at the bottom is often the entry point

darius_xnnrd

Memory used to have a dozen participants racing each other into oversupply, and now it has three. High bandwidth memory is qualified into customer designs years ahead, sold under long-term agreements, and is far harder to switch away from than commodity DRAM.

About OTCPK:DXYN

Dixie Group

Manufactures, markets, and sells floorcovering products to residential customers in North America and internationally.

Slight risk and slightly overvalued.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

RI
Rick_Orford
FJET logo
Rick_Orford on Starfighters Space ·

The 1960s Fighter Jet That Could Crack Open a $20 Billion Satellite Market

Fair Value:US$519.8% undervalued
22 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
3 users have liked this narrative
FU
FundamentalFlow
VRT logo
FundamentalFlow on Vertiv Holdings Co ·

The Short and Long Term Compounder of Liquid Cooling industry.

Fair Value:US$45036.2% undervalued
49 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
13 users have liked this narrative
JO
John_Eric
SPXC logo
John_Eric on SPX Technologies ·

I Fell in Love With a Data-Center Cooling Stock. Then I Opened the Filings.

Fair Value:US$2034.5% overvalued
20 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
4 users have liked this narrative
TR
tripledub
GQG logo
tripledub on GQG Partners ·

The Cheap Genius Problem

Fair Value:AU$3.2155.0% undervalued
30 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
21 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

DP
DP_invest
BWLPG logo
DP_invest on BWG ·

High rates continues for Q4 '26 - Q1 '27

Fair Value:NOK 2359.4% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
AG
Agricola
SRL logo
Agricola on Salazar Resources ·

A Case for Salazar Resources to reach CAD $2.50 - $7.50+ by 2030

Fair Value:CA$7.594.7% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
ST
StoxEurope
SIP logo
StoxEurope on Sipef ·

Why I Invest in SIPEF?

Fair Value:€116.2914.9% undervalued
16 users have followed this narrative
4 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

OS
oscargarcia
NVDA logo
oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

Fair Value:US$28019.5% undervalued
307 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
CU
MSFT logo
CubanEros on Microsoft ·

A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Fair Value:US$419.9118.3% overvalued
164 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative
KI
AMZN logo
KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

Fair Value:US$475.0944.2% undervalued
186 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative