This company listing is no longer active

This company may still be operating, however this listing is no longer active. Find out why through their latest events.

MINEBEA MITSUMI Valuation

Is MNBE.Y undervalued compared to its fair value, analyst forecasts and its price relative to the market?

Valuation Score

3/6

Valuation Score 3/6

  • Below Fair Value

  • Significantly Below Fair Value

  • Price-To-Earnings vs Peers

  • Price-To-Earnings vs Industry

  • Price-To-Earnings vs Fair Ratio

  • Analyst Forecast

Share Price vs Fair Value

What is the Fair Price of MNBE.Y when looking at its future cash flows? For this estimate we use a Discounted Cash Flow model.

Below Fair Value: MNBE.Y ($38.18) is trading above our estimate of fair value ($38.1)

Significantly Below Fair Value: MNBE.Y is trading above our estimate of fair value.


Key Valuation Metric

Which metric is best to use when looking at relative valuation for MNBE.Y?

Key metric: As MNBE.Y is profitable we use its Price-To-Earnings Ratio for relative valuation analysis.

The above table shows the Price to Earnings ratio for MNBE.Y. This is calculated by dividing MNBE.Y's market cap by their current earnings.
What is MNBE.Y's PE Ratio?
PE Ratio17.5x
EarningsJP¥59.43b
Market CapJP¥1.03t

Price to Earnings Ratio vs Peers

How does MNBE.Y's PE Ratio compare to its peers?

The above table shows the PE ratio for MNBE.Y vs its peers. Here we also display the market cap and forecasted growth for additional consideration.
CompanyForward PEEstimated GrowthMarket Cap
Peer Average18.6x
DCI Donaldson Company
19.5x6.01%US$8.1b
ITT ITT
22.5x6.48%US$11.6b
TKR Timken
14.6x11.64%US$4.8b
MIDD Middleby
18x6.47%US$7.8b
MNBE.Y MINEBEA MITSUMI
17.5x11.03%US$1.0t

Price-To-Earnings vs Peers: MNBE.Y is good value based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (17.5x) compared to the peer average (20x).


Price to Earnings Ratio vs Industry

How does MNBE.Y's PE Ratio compare vs other companies in the US Machinery Industry?

2 CompaniesPrice / EarningsEstimated GrowthMarket Cap
GTEC Greenland Technologies Holding
2.3xn/aUS$35.83m
FATH Fathom Digital Manufacturing
2.6xn/aUS$35.24m
No more companies available in this PE range
MNBE.Y 17.5xIndustry Avg. 23.1xNo. of Companies13PE01224364860+
2 CompaniesEstimated GrowthMarket Cap
No more companies

Price-To-Earnings vs Industry: MNBE.Y is good value based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (17.5x) compared to the US Machinery industry average (22x)


Price to Earnings Ratio vs Fair Ratio

What is MNBE.Y's PE Ratio compared to its Fair PE Ratio? This is the expected PE Ratio taking into account the company's forecast earnings growth, profit margins and other risk factors.

MNBE.Y PE Ratio vs Fair Ratio.
Fair Ratio
Current PE Ratio17.5x
Fair PE Ratio20.7x

Price-To-Earnings vs Fair Ratio: MNBE.Y is good value based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (17.5x) compared to the estimated Fair Price-To-Earnings Ratio (20.7x).


Analyst Price Targets

What is the analyst 12-month forecast and do we have any statistical confidence in the consensus price target?

Analyst Forecast: Insufficient data to show price forecast.


Discover undervalued companies

Company Analysis and Financial Data Status

DataLast Updated (UTC time)
Company Analysis2023/04/04 14:44
End of Day Share Price 2023/03/31 00:00
Earnings2022/12/31
Annual Earnings2022/03/31

Data Sources

The data used in our company analysis is from S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC. The following data is used in our analysis model to generate this report. Data is normalised which can introduce a delay from the source being available.

PackageDataTimeframeExample US Source *
Company Financials10 years
  • Income statement
  • Cash flow statement
  • Balance sheet
Analyst Consensus Estimates+3 years
  • Forecast financials
  • Analyst price targets
Market Prices30 years
  • Stock prices
  • Dividends, Splits and Actions
Ownership10 years
  • Top shareholders
  • Insider trading
Management10 years
  • Leadership team
  • Board of directors
Key Developments10 years
  • Company announcements

* Example for US securities, for non-US equivalent regulatory forms and sources are used.

Unless specified all financial data is based on a yearly period but updated quarterly. This is known as Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) or Last Twelve Month (LTM) Data. Learn more.

Analysis Model and Snowflake

Details of the analysis model used to generate this report is available on our Github page, we also have guides on how to use our reports and tutorials on Youtube.

Learn about the world class team who designed and built the Simply Wall St analysis model.

Industry and Sector Metrics

Our industry and section metrics are calculated every 6 hours by Simply Wall St, details of our process are available on Github.

Analyst Sources

MINEBEA MITSUMI Inc. is covered by 25 analysts. 16 of those analysts submitted the estimates of revenue or earnings used as inputs to our report. Analysts submissions are updated throughout the day.

AnalystInstitution
George ChangAletheia Analyst Network Limited
Tsutomu KijimaBarclays
Masashi KubotaBofA Global Research